『雅言覺非』의 稿本 찾기와 書誌적 고찰

Abstract

‘AhEon(雅言)’ of ‘AhEonGakBi(雅言覺非)’ was found to be used as a headword which had the meaning of ‘enlightening the public about the wrong thing’ through ‘right word or general word’. Among the writings of Dasan, ‘AhEonGakBi’ was the only one placing ‘Dam(談)’ and ‘Jeo(著)’ in the first part on the bottom of each book as the classification mark which classified the forms based on the nature of the contents. However, this classification was not unique one made by Dasan, but it was affected by ‘JiBukWooDam(池北偶談)’ of Wang, Sa Jeong (1634~1711) and ‘YiDam(耳談)’ of Wang, Dong Gwe. Looking at the contents of ‘JiBukWoo Dam’, it was classified into four kinds such as ‘談故, 談獻, 談藝, 談異’ and ‘Dam (談)’ was used as one of classification criteria. In addition, as Chinese characters used in proverbs of ‘YiDam(耳談)’ and ‘AhEonGakBi’were included in the classification criteria, it was found that Dasan recognized ‘Dam(談)’ as the classification criteria. ‘AhEonGakBi’ was published by Dasan in 1819. The final version was made by revising and rewriting it several times. We determined which manuscript was close to the original copy by comparing and analyzing the differences of 25 kinds of manuscripts. ‘AhEonGakBi(雅言覺非)’ was revised and rewritten several times. It was proven by the presence of appendix of ‘BoYu(補遺)’ and ‘WuBoYu(又補遺)’. In addition, it was highly likely that Dasan was involved in modifications in each section. It was ‘Asami copy’ that represented these processes well. Therefore, the ‘Asami copy’ was highly likely to be the first copy which was the closest to the original copy of Dasan. It was supported as follows. The first supplements of ‘BinGong(賓貢)’ in ‘WuBoYu(又補遺)’. In addition, red colors were marked for positions where the items of ‘BoYu’ were located in the main body, but the items of ‘BinGong’ were marked with black colors. It suggested that ‘BinGong’ was added at different times. It was very important evidence to support that the ‘Asami copy’ was the first one. In addition, as ‘JangSeoGakBon’ and ‘JoSeonGwangMunHeoBon (JungGyu YoungBon)’ excluded ‘IlHwi(一麾)’ among the items of ‘BoYu’, it demonstrated that Dasan intended to delete ‘IlHwi(一麾)’. Therefore, as it was demonstrated that ‘JangSeoGakBon’, ‘JoSeonGwangMunHeoBon(JungGyu YoungBon)’ and ‘Asami copy’ were hand writing copies which were close to each other, it was highly likely that some sections were revised and deleted in these copies. Later manuscripts had the appendix of a book review of Kim, Mae Sun with a title of ‘JeAhEonGakBi(題雅言覺非後)’. However, as the copy of the Asami library at UC Berkeley had it as the headnotes, it was special. It was likely that a review was sent as a letter and temporally attached to help him conveniently compare contents of the main body. If it was true, it would be more certain that the Asamicopy was the first one which was the hand writing copy of ‘AhEonGakBi’.