茶山 著 『樂書孤存』 필사본의 비교 검토

Abstract

This study was done to clarify the best and complete script through the comparison and examination of Aksŏ Kojon 『楽書孤存』 and find out the origin of printed Sin Chosŏnsa version 新朝鮮社本. In addition, it found bibliographic feature, and examined two contents of three kinds of the manuscript. At first, external errors in transcribed course―in other words, it evaluated the degree of completion while pointing out external errors of six parts. At second, while correcting typos and missing words in four kinds of Aksŏ Kojon, it aimed to confirm the best and complete script, and also to find the origin of Sin Chosŏnsa version. Most of all, it found the errors in three kinds of Aksŏ Kojon manuscript, dividing them into six examples. As a result after comparison and examination, Changsŏgak version 蔵書閣本 is not deemed the complete script, but an early-formed script. Kyujanggak version 奎章閣本 seems to have more errors than Berkeley's, however, it was designated as the best script since it consist of graceful writing, and having no modification and no dots called kwanju 冠註. Moreover, after researching the typos and missing words in four kinds of Aksŏ Kojon, the least typos and missing words are included in Berkeley version, and the most are contained in Sin Chosŏnsa version. Additionally, the manuscript which is the origin script of Sin Chosŏnsa version isn't at least Kyujanggak version, eventually, the origin of Sin Chosŏnsa version is compressed into Changsŏgak version or Berkeley version. To summarize, Changsŏgak version, Berkeley version, and Kyujangak version is listed in well-completed degree. Moreover, Kyujanggak version can be confirmed as the best Aksŏ Kojon, or the complete script. Finally, it can be concluded that the origin of Sin Chosŏnsa version is Berkeley version.