번역한국어와 비번역한국어 간 타동형 감정구문에서의 무생물 주어 사용 차이 연구
A Study of Differences in Inanimate Subjects in Transitive Emotive Verb Clauses Between Translational and Non-Translation Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study examines inanimate subjects in transitive emotive verbconstructions as in '-을 기쁘게 하다‘(to make - happy) to determine ifthey are unique to translated texts as a result of being importedfrom English or equally observable in authentic Korean texts. Traditionally, such a construction has been viewed as unacceptablein Korean as its grammar construes only conscious human subjects as capable of such emotive actions as making someone happy. Yet,instances of inanimate entities bringing emotive impacts on humansubjects are spotted in authentic Korean texts. The present studyanalyzes a translational corpus of translations of contemporaryEnglish novels and a comparable corpus of Korean novels in thesame genres of general fiction to find out if the two differsignificantly. The results show little statistically significantdifference, indicating that inanimate subjects in transitive emotiveverb constructions are a feature not unique to translated Korean butshared by authentic Korean as well.
Abstract
The study examines inanimate subjects in transitive emotive verbconstructions as in '-을 기쁘게 하다‘(to make - happy) to determine ifthey are unique to translated texts as a result of being importedfrom English or equally observable in authentic Korean texts. Traditionally, such a construction has been viewed as unacceptablein Korean as its grammar construes only conscious human subjects as capable of such emotive actions as making someone happy. Yet,instances of inanimate entities bringing emotive impacts on humansubjects are spotted in authentic Korean texts. The present studyanalyzes a translational corpus of translations of contemporaryEnglish novels and a comparable corpus of Korean novels in thesame genres of general fiction to find out if the two differsignificantly. The results show little statistically significantdifference, indicating that inanimate subjects in transitive emotiveverb constructions are a feature not unique to translated Korean butshared by authentic Korean as well.
참고문헌 (11)
- 김은일, "유생성(animacy)이 영한 번역에 미치는 영향", 언어과학, 16(1), pp.23~40 (2009), 한국언어과학회
- 김은일, "영어 수동문의 한국어 번역에 대한 기능문법적 설명", 언어과학, 18(1), pp.21~41 (2011), 한국언어과학회
- 스테판 크놉, "한국어 ‘피동성 표현’의 지위 : 유형론적 문법화의 관점에서", 한글, (282), pp.155~194 (2008), 한글학회
- 이영옥, "무생물 주어 타동사 구문의 영한 번역", 번역학연구, 2(1), pp.53~76 (2001)
- 이창수, "영한 번역에서의 동사성 체계 변화 연구 -무생물 주체를 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 8(1), pp.155~175 (2006), 한국통역번역학회
- Dunning, T., "Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence", Computational Linguistics, 19(1), pp.61~74 (1993)
- Halliday, M.A.K, "An Introduction to Functional Grammar(3rd ed.)" (2004), Hodder Arnold
- McEnery, T, "Corpus linguistics(2nd ed.)" (2001), Edinburgh University Press
- Scott, M., "Wordsmith Tools(version 6. 0)" (2012), Lexical Analysis Software
- Yamamoto, M., "Animacy and Reference : A Cognitive Approach to Corpus Linguistics" (1999), John Benjamins B. V
- Yamamoto, M., "Agency and Impersonality : Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations" (2006), John Benjamins B. V