불한 번역문의 무생물 주어 사용 양상 연구: ‘ - 게 하다’ 사동 구문을 중심으로
The Aspect of the Use of Inanimate Subjects in a French– Korean Translational Corpus: Focused on Transitive Auxiliary Verb Constructions ‘ - 게 하다’.
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the use of inanimate subjects in the Koreantransitive auxiliary verb constructions ‘-게 하다(to make V or tomake A)’ by comparing a French-Korean (hereafter F-K) translatedcorpus with a Korean non-translated corpus and English-Korean (hereafter E-K) translated corpus. Unlike in English or in French,transitive constructions in Korean tend to use conscious humansubjects. Also, transitive constructions that have inanimate subjectsare usually unacceptable in Korean. Previous studies have foundno statistically significant difference between Korean non-translatedand an E-K translational corpus in terms of frequency of inanimatesubjects in transitive constructions. Therefore, in order to explorethe possibility of generalizing such findings, this study comparesthe frequency of inanimate subjects in transitive auxiliary verbconstructions in the F-K translated corpus with the frequency oftransitive auxiliary verb constructions in the Korean non-translatedcorpus. The result of this study was consistent with previousstudies showing little statistically significant difference between thetwo. However, in the transitive auxiliary verb constructions ofrelative clauses, the frequency of inanimate subjects in the F-Ktranslated corpus was higher than in the Korean non-translatedcorpus. In addition, the F-K translated corpus had a variety ofinanimate subjects in transitive auxiliary verb constructions andshowed a high rate of purely inanimate subjects that are notattached to human.
Abstract
This study examines the use of inanimate subjects in the Koreantransitive auxiliary verb constructions ‘-게 하다(to make V or tomake A)’ by comparing a French-Korean (hereafter F-K) translatedcorpus with a Korean non-translated corpus and English-Korean (hereafter E-K) translated corpus. Unlike in English or in French,transitive constructions in Korean tend to use conscious humansubjects. Also, transitive constructions that have inanimate subjectsare usually unacceptable in Korean. Previous studies have foundno statistically significant difference between Korean non-translatedand an E-K translational corpus in terms of frequency of inanimatesubjects in transitive constructions. Therefore, in order to explorethe possibility of generalizing such findings, this study comparesthe frequency of inanimate subjects in transitive auxiliary verbconstructions in the F-K translated corpus with the frequency oftransitive auxiliary verb constructions in the Korean non-translatedcorpus. The result of this study was consistent with previousstudies showing little statistically significant difference between thetwo. However, in the transitive auxiliary verb constructions ofrelative clauses, the frequency of inanimate subjects in the F-Ktranslated corpus was higher than in the Korean non-translatedcorpus. In addition, the F-K translated corpus had a variety ofinanimate subjects in transitive auxiliary verb constructions andshowed a high rate of purely inanimate subjects that are notattached to human.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김은일, "유생성(animacy)이 영한 번역에 미치는 영향", 언어과학, 16(1), pp.23~40 (2009), 한국언어과학회
- 김혜영, "국어 번역 글쓰기의 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2009
- 김혜영, "비교코퍼스에 기반한 불한번역 문학텍스트의 언어적 특성 연구 —단순화와 어휘적 특성을 중심으로—", 번역학연구, 11(1), pp.161~190 (2010), 한국번역학회
- 성백환, "무생물 주어로 시작되는 타동사 문장의 순차번역 전략", 번역학연구, 7(1), pp.105~129 (2006), 한국번역학회
- 신현숙, "(의미로 분류한)현대 한국어 학습 사전" (2000), 한국문화사
- 이경애, "강조구문 C'est ... qui", que ...의 통사구조, 어떻게 볼 것인가?, 2000, pp.43, 465~512
- 이영옥, "무생물 주어 타동사 구문의 영한 번역", 번역학연구, 2(1), pp.53~76 (2001)
- 이영옥, "영어관계절 구문 번역의 문제", 번역학연구, 5(1), pp.145~166 (2004), 한국번역학회
- 이창수, "영한 번역에서의 동사성 체계 변화 연구 -무생물 주체를 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 8(1), pp.155~175 (2006), 한국통역번역학회
- 이창수, "번역한국어와 비번역한국어 간 타동형 감정구문에서의 무생물 주어 사용 차이 연구", 통번역학연구, 18(1), pp.123~141 (2014), 통번역연구소
- 이향, "국내 번역학 연구 경향에 관한 일 고찰 -「통번역학 연구」게재 논문의 분류를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 15, pp.341~362 (2011), 통번역연구소
- 장영준, "영·한 번역에서의 주어선택과 행위자성", 번역학연구, 10(2), pp.105~132 (2009), 한국번역학회
- 정연일, "번역인증시험의 맥락에서 살펴본 번역능력의 정의", 통번역학연구, 10(1), pp.1~15 (2006), 통번역연구소
- 최동익, "무생물 주어 구문에 대한 영한 기계 번역 오류분석", 언어학 연구, (29), pp.279~299 (2013), 한국중원언어학회
- 홍태숙, "명사구 내포문에 관한 한국어와 불어의 비교연구 : 문학작품 번역의 관점에서", 박사, 불어학, pp.2006
- Brunette, L., "Towards a terminology for translation quality assessment : A comparison of TQA practices", The Translator, 6(2), pp.169~182 (2000)
- Fawcett, P., "언어학과 번역" (2015), 한국문화사
- Grimshaw, J., "Arguments Structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Kemmer, S., "Causative constructions and cognitive model:The English make causative", The First International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics:Perspectives for the 21st Century, pp.803~832 (2001)
- Wiliams, J., "번역학 연구의 길잡이" (2006), 이지북스