진화경제학적 동반성장 모형
The Evolutionary Solidarity Growth Model
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
자본주의가 새로운 국면에 진입하였다는 주장이 대체적으로 받아들여지고 있다. 정치경제학은 전통적 과제를 견지하면서도 이런 변화를 고려할 새로운 차원의 성장이론과 성장전략을 제시해야 한다. 이 논문은 최근 급속한 발전을 이루어 온 ‘혁신과 제도’에 관한 진화경제학의 연구성과와 포스트케인지안 경제학의 ‘소득분배’에 관한 전통적 문제의식을 결합함으로써 지식기반경제의 동반성장모형을 제시하였다. 이 모형은 두 경제학파가 지금까지 이루어 낸 연구성과를 담고 있다. 첫째, 신고전학파 경제학의 ‘생산의 3요소’보다 기술혁신과 제도적 구조, 곧 ‘국가혁신체제’가 성장을 촉진한다. 둘째, 국가혁신체제의 구성방식이나 국민적 성장방식은 나라마다 다르다. 셋째, 그 과정에서 성장과 분배의 결합방식도 다르다. 동반성장의 가능성은 국가특수적 절묘한 조정능력에 좌우된다. 이 논문이 제시하고있는 성장모형은 아머블(Bruno Amable 1993)의 모형을 크게 수정하여 새로운방식으로 개선된 것이다.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that the contemporary capitalism is entered into the new stage. The Political Economics must present a growth theory and its strategy on the new level considering the new change, while maintaining the old issues. This paper tries to come up with the solidarity growth model at the knowledge-based era, joining the Evolutionary Economics on ‘innovation’ and ‘institution’ with the Post-Keynesian Economics about ‘income distribution’. This model includes theoretical and empirical contents two schools have accumulated. Firstly, the economic growth is encouraged by innovation and institution, namely the National Innovation System rather than the ‘three production factors’ of the Neo-classical Economics. Secondly, the institutional constellation of innovation systems and the growth models vary nationally. Thirdly, the way of combining the growth and the distribution is nationally diverse. The potential solidarity growth depends on nation-specific, “fine tuning competencies” The model presented in this paper is greatly modified from the model of Amable(1993) and improved in my own way.
참고문헌 (38)
- 한성안, "진화경제학의 국가특수성 논의와 정책적 시사점", 경제학연구, 48(4), pp.261~290 (2000), 한국경제 학회
- 한성안, "사회적 자본, 경제성장, 혁신", 경제학연구, 53(1), pp.5~32 (2005), 한국경제학회
- 한성안, "참여정부 국가균형발전정책에 대한 진화경제학적 평가", 사회경제평론, (30), pp.277~329 (2008), 한국사회경제학회
- 한성안, "진화경제학의 유토피아로서 "에브토피아"", 사회경제평론, (34), pp.207~244 (2010), 한국사회경제학회
- Abramobitz, M., "Catching up, Foreign Ahead, and Falling Behind", Journal of Economic History, 46(2), pp.385~407 (1986)
- Abramobitz, M., "The Origins of Postwar Catch-Up and Convergence Boom. in: The Dynamics of Technology, Trade and Growth" (1994), Edward Elgar
- Aghion, P., "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction", Econometrica, 60, pp.323~351 (1992)
- Amable, B., "National Effects of Learning, International Specialization and Growth Path. in: Technology and the Wealth of Nations, The Dynamics of Constructed Advantage" (1993), Pinter Publishers
- Amable, B., "The Diversity of Modern Capitalism" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Amendola, G., "The Dynamics of International Competitiveness", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 129 (1993)
- Aoki, M., "The Contingent Governance of Teams: Analysis of Institutional Complementarity", International Economic Review, 35, pp.657~676 (1994)
- Aoki, M., "Information, Corporate Governance and Institutional Diversity" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Barro, Robert J., "Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth", Review of Economic Studies, 59(201), pp.645~662 (1992)
- Boyer, R., "French Statism and the Crossroad. in: Political Economy of Modern Capitalism" (1997), Sage
- Davidson, P., "Post Keynesian Perspective on Twenty-First Century Economic Problems" (2002), Edward Elgar
- Dixon, R., "A Model of Regional Growth-Rate Differences on Kaldorian lines", Oxford Economic Papers, 1, pp.201~214 (1975)
- Dosi, G., "The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade" (1990), New York University Press
- Ebbinghaus, B., "Does the European Social Model Exist and Can it Survive?. in: The Role of Employer Associations and Labour Unions in EMU: Institutional Requirements for European Economic Policies" (1999), Ashgate
- Edquist, Ch., "Systems of Innovation Approaches- their Emergence and Characteristics. in: Systems of Innovation: Growth Competitiveness and Employment" (2000), Edward Elgar
- Edquist, Ch., "Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. in: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Fagerberg, J., "A Technology Gap Approach to Why Growth rates Differ", Research Policy, 16(2), pp.87~99 (1987)
- Fagerberg, J., "Why Growth Rates Differ?. in: Technical Change and Economic Theory" (1988)
- Fagerberg, J., "Technology-Gaps, Innovation-Diffusion and Transformation: An Evolutionary Interpretation", Research Policy, 3, pp.1291~1304 (2002)
- Freeman, Ch., "Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan" (1987), Pinter
- Freeman. Ch., "The Economics of Industrial Innovation" (1997), MIT Press
- Single Peaked vs. Diversified Capitalism: The Relation between Economic Institutions and Outcomes, "Freeman, R.B.", NBER, ~, pp.Working paper 7556 (2000)
- Granovetter, M., "Economic Action Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness", American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp.481~510 (1985)
- Hall, P., "Varieties of Capitalism: the Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Lucas, R., "On the Mechanics of Economic Development", Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp.3~42 (1988)
- Lundvall, B., "National System of Innovation, Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning" (1992)
- McCombie, J.S.L., "Economic Growth and the Balance-of-Payments Constraint" (1994), St. Martin’s Press
- Nelson, R.R., "What has been the Matter with Neoclassical Growth Theory?. in: The Economics of Growth and Technical Changes, Technologies, Nations, Agents" (1994), Aldershot
- Nelson, R.R, "National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Romer, P.M., "Returns and Long-Run Growth", Journal of Political Economy, 94(2), pp.1002~1037 (1986)
- Romer, P.M., "Endogenous Technological Change", Journal of Political Economy, 98(2) (1990)
- Schmidt, V., "The Future of European Capitalism", Oxford University Press
- Thirlwall, A., "The Balance of Payments Constraint as an Explanation of International Growth Rate Differences. in: Banca Naionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review", pp.45~53 (2002)
- Verspagen, B., "A New Empirical Approach to Catching up or Falling Behind", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2, pp.359~380 (1991)