개항기 전후 호서유학자의 학맥별 갈등양상과 그 성리학적 근거

Abstract

This paper deals with conflict patterns and a relevant New-Confucian basis by the school ties of Hoseo Confucian scholars around the age of civilization. Around the age of civilization, school ties created in the Hoseo region are largely divided into the following 5 representative types. First is the Im Heon-heui and Jeon Woo school ties and the Song Byeong-hwa school ties of the Nangnon line in the Hoseo region. Second is the Lee Seol and Kim Bok-han school ties and the Lee Sang-soo and Park Mun-ho school ties of the Horon line. Third is the Song Byeong-seon and Song Byeong-sun school ties and the Lee Cheol-yeong school ties of the Horak compromise line. Fourth is the Choi Ik-hyeon and Yu Jin-ha school ties of the Hoseo Lee Hang-ro school ties. Fifth is the Shin Gi-seon and Yuk Yong-jeong school ties of Hoseo Dongdoseogiron. Amidst the reality of the turbulent era, they caused conflicts and division in accordance with the view of source owing to acute confrontation between Wijeongcheoksaron and Gaehwaronro(civilization theory). Also, active Euibyeong Tujaengnon(theory of struggle led by the army in the cause of justice) of Choi Ik-hyeon and Song Byeong-seon and passive Jajeongron(self-purification theory) of Im Hun-heui and Jeon Woo came into conflict. Also, Yuk Yong-jeong and Shin Gi-seon criticized both Wuijeong Cheoksaron and Gabsin Gaehwadang while insisting on Dongdoseogiron which sought the compromise and harmony of both. Such a difference in the recognition of reality and in the view of source by school ties may be caused by any difference in the Neo-Confucian basis involving the recognition of Li or Chi and the recognition of Inmulseongdongi.