조선 후기 노론 학맥의 분화와 그 세계관 − 18세기 호락학파의 형성과 현실인식을 중심으로 −

Abstract

This study is about the division of NoRon School root and their world viewpoints late in Chosun focused on the Theory of Ho and the Theory of Rak. As well known, the HoRak dispute started from the students of Suam Gwon Sang Ha, who was known as the descent of Uam Song Si Youl late in the 17th century and lasted for longer than 100 years between HoSeo School and RakHa School under NoRon School on such issues as InMulSeongDongI(人物性同異), SeongBeomSimDongI(聖凡心同異), MiBalSimCheSunSeon(未發心體純善)), etc. HoSeo School scholars advocating the Theory of Yi(異論) claimed that RakHa School scholars would fall into the state of 'InSuMuBun(人獸無分)': no distinguishing between human and animal, while Rak School scholars deplored that HoSeo School was falling in very risky thoughts that 'would block everybody in the world from going the way of Goodness(沮天下爲善之路)'. Since Song Si Youl, NoRon School had been divided into HoSeo and RakHa, under which Rak scholars wanted everybody to get to a certain moral level by self-discipline while Ho scholars emphasized the strict separation between the great man and normal people so that the people under training could be completely enlightened with more efforts. That is, such Ho scholars as Gwon Sang Ha, Han Won Jin, etc had discriminative historical sense while such Rak scholars as Kim Chang Hyeop, Lee Jae, etc showed optimistic reality sense.