관광여객선 세월호 사건을 통해 본 정부정책결정에 대한 고찰
Exploratory Research on Policy Making Priorities And Disaster Response System Through The Sewol Ferry Accident
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The cause of the Ferry Sewol incident is blamed simply for the absence of a disaster response system, such as superannuation of an old ship, failure to take immediate measures against the accident, inadequate safety education, etc. However, tracing back to its origin, it is possible to discover the cause of the accident in deregulation of ignorance in safety, such as abolition of the persisting period for a passenger ferry, alleviation of safety ship standards, extension of the ship inspection cycle, etc., which were carried out under the cloak of the solution to a shipping company’s operating deficit and management efficiency. In other words, the decision-making of policy makers regarding deregulation was already done by putting first the happiness of the majority and lessening of the economic burden of shipping companies instead of the safety of people, and this already-fixed policy allowed Ferry Sewol, which should have been scrapped, to be in service again. Consequently, this decision-making process led to a tragic disaster. This study, concerning the regulation and reformation done in relation to policy-decision, made an in-depth analysis of the policy decision from the utilitarian position aiming for pursuit of happiness in the majority, a moral perspective aiming for every individual’s basic human rights and life, and the position of a neutral theory which reflects all the above.
Abstract
The cause of the Ferry Sewol incident is blamed simply for the absence of a disaster response system, such as superannuation of an old ship, failure to take immediate measures against the accident, inadequate safety education, etc. However, tracing back to its origin, it is possible to discover the cause of the accident in deregulation of ignorance in safety, such as abolition of the persisting period for a passenger ferry, alleviation of safety ship standards, extension of the ship inspection cycle, etc., which were carried out under the cloak of the solution to a shipping company’s operating deficit and management efficiency. In other words, the decision-making of policy makers regarding deregulation was already done by putting first the happiness of the majority and lessening of the economic burden of shipping companies instead of the safety of people, and this already-fixed policy allowed Ferry Sewol, which should have been scrapped, to be in service again. Consequently, this decision-making process led to a tragic disaster. This study, concerning the regulation and reformation done in relation to policy-decision, made an in-depth analysis of the policy decision from the utilitarian position aiming for pursuit of happiness in the majority, a moral perspective aiming for every individual’s basic human rights and life, and the position of a neutral theory which reflects all the above.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강민아, "정책결정과정의 프레이밍에 대한 담론 분석: 방사성폐기물처리장입지 선정 과정을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 41(2), pp.23~45 (2007), 한국행정학회
- 규제개혁심사의 문제점과 개선방안, "강정민", 경제개혁연대 연구원, ~ (2013)
- 강정원, "규제개혁심사의 문제점과 개선방안", 경제개혁이슈, 2013(03), pp.2~4 (2013)
- 김대군, "공직자의 도덕적 해이 현상에 대한 공공선택론적 분석", 윤리연구, 1(60), pp.345~373 (2005), 한국윤리학회
- 김옥숙, "退溪學에 있어서 道德과 社會正義", 퇴계학보, (68) (1990), 퇴계학연구원
- Michael J. Sande, "정의란 무엇인가" (2009), 김영사
- 맹자, "맹자집주" (2007), 전통문화연구원
- 박효종, "합리적 선택과 공공재(1)", pp.142~143 (1994), 인간사랑
- 변양규, "창조경제와 서비스산업 규제개혁 과제", ~ (2012)
- 선진국 규제개혁제도 비교연구, "심우일", 중소기업연구원, ~ (2012)
- 국가와지방자치단체간 다중적규제개혁에 대한 연구, "서재호", 한국사회와행정연구, 233~234 (2014)
- 2003, , ~
- 천대윤, "공정사회의 특성과 도에 관한 소고", 2010년 동계학술대회 (2010), 한국정책학회
- 천대윤, "공정사회와 도덕성", 하계학술대회발표논문 (2011), 한국행정학회
- 천대윤, "공정사회와 정책방향: 롤스(John Rawls)의 공정성 사상을 중심으로", 한국정책학 (2011)
- 최병선, "정부규제론" (2000), 법문사
- 양정철, "한ㆍ중ㆍ일 크루즈 항로 중심성 분석에 관한 연구 - 제주도ㆍ상하이ㆍ요코하마 항구의 사회 네트워크 분석을 중심으로 -", 한국외식산업학회지, 12(2), pp.79~93 (2016), 한국외식산업학회
- 오원철, "산업 및 조직심리학" (1995), 박영사
- Aristode, "Aristode, THE Policics, Book, Ⅶ, 1323a" (1946), Oxford University Press
- Braun, D, "Public Policyand Political Ideas", pp.11~29 (1999), Edward Elgar
- Frank Fischer, "Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Hajer, Maarten A., "Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Immanuel Kant, "Kant's Political Writings", pp.73~74 (1970), Cambridge University Press
- Immanuel Kant, "Immanuel Kant, Groundwook for the Metaphysics of Morals", pp.442~ (1964), Harper Torchbook
- Jeremy Bebtham, "Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation" (1996), Oxford University Press
- Kahneman, D., "Judgment under uncertain ty : heuristics and biases" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Kleindorfer, "Decision sciences: an integrative perspective" (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Lasswell. Harold D., "A Preview of Policy Sciences" (1971), American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc
- Nisbett, R.E., "Human inferences : Strateg ies and shortcoming s of social judgment" (1980), Prentice-Hall
- Queenv, "14 Queens Bench Division 273, 9 December", ~ (1884)
- Sandel, Michael J, "Markets, Morals, and Civic Life", Bulletin of the American Academy, pp.6~11 (2005)
- Sandel, Michael J, "Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?" (2010), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Schön, D., "Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies" (1994), Basic Books
- Stevenson, "Klei ndorfer" (1990), Kunreut her & Schoemaker
- Tevenson, M.K., "Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (Vol 1.)", pp.283~374 (1990), Consulting Psychologists Press