영어와 한국어의 명사화에 관한 비교 연구
A Comparative Study on the Nominalizations in English and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparative study of nominalizations in English and Korean. The following findings are made. First, it is shown that the two languages have some markers for indicating the degrees in the strength of nominal characteristics. In English the degrees are signaled by derivational nominalizations, gerundive nominalizations, and factive nominalizations. In Korean, however, each nominal marker such as ‘-um’ or ‘-ki’ could indicate the different degrees of nominal characteristics. Second, it is shown that Korean shows more linear word order correspondences between the clauses and their nominalized phrases than English counterparts. Despite the differences, there is a strong tendency to align the two kinds of word orders similarly. Third, it is claimed that Korean nominals have more restricted meaning extensions than English ones. Fourth, it is claimed that English nominalizations play very important roles as the device for grammatical metaphors. It is also shown that the same important roles of nominalization could be given for Korean grammatical metaphors. I also analyse the subcategories of grammatical metaphors and provide the frequency of occurrences for each subcategory.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparative study of nominalizations in English and Korean. The following findings are made. First, it is shown that the two languages have some markers for indicating the degrees in the strength of nominal characteristics. In English the degrees are signaled by derivational nominalizations, gerundive nominalizations, and factive nominalizations. In Korean, however, each nominal marker such as ‘-um’ or ‘-ki’ could indicate the different degrees of nominal characteristics. Second, it is shown that Korean shows more linear word order correspondences between the clauses and their nominalized phrases than English counterparts. Despite the differences, there is a strong tendency to align the two kinds of word orders similarly. Third, it is claimed that Korean nominals have more restricted meaning extensions than English ones. Fourth, it is claimed that English nominalizations play very important roles as the device for grammatical metaphors. It is also shown that the same important roles of nominalization could be given for Korean grammatical metaphors. I also analyse the subcategories of grammatical metaphors and provide the frequency of occurrences for each subcategory.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김일환, "국어의 명사화 어미의 분포에 대한 계량적 연구", 國語學, 42, pp.141~175 (2003), 국어학회
- 김명진, "야누스의 과학" (2008), 사계절출판사
- 김미자, "명사화 구문의 형태통사론적인 현상 진단", 경희대학교 고봉논집, 26, pp.53~69 (2000)
- 김종복, "‘것’보문절의 문법적 특징: 말뭉치 조사를 바탕으로", 언어과학연구, 48(48), pp.181~199 (2009), 언어과학회
- 김흥수, "속격 명사화, 명사병치 명사화의 양상과 기능", 국민대학교 어문학논총, 13, pp.119~137 (1994)
- 시사영어사, "What is History" (2003), 시사영어사
- 오예옥, "형식의미론과 인지의미론에서 본 어휘의미론" (2004), 역락
- 최형기, "명사화 {-음}, {-기}의 의미기능", 국어국문학연구, 14, pp.97~116 (1991)
- Aarts,B, "Conceptions of Gradience in the History of Linguistics", Language Sciences, 26, pp.343~389 (2004)
- Downing, A, "A University Course in English Grammar" (1992), Routledge
- Halliday,M, "Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning" (1978), Edward
- Halliday,M, "Thins and Relations: Regrammaticising Experience As Technical Knowledge. in:Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science", pp.185~236 (1998), Routledge
- Halliday, M, "Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition" (1999), Cassell
- Jung,Y, "A Morpho-Functional Analysis of Nominalizations and the Category Preserving Principle", Journal of Language Sciences, 5(1), pp.175~213 (1998)
- Jung,J, "Grammatical Metaphor: A Hallidayan Approach to Korean and English", Journal of Australian Studies, 3(1), pp.109~117 (1996)
- Klaiman,M, "Affectedness and Control: A Typology of Voice Systems. in:Passive and Voice", pp.25~83 (1988), John Benjamins
- Lee,K, "A Grammar of Korean Nominalization. in:인문과학", pp.46~104 (1982)
- Lyons,J, "Semantics II" (1978), Cambridge University Press
- Malouf,R, "Verbal Gerunds As Mixed Categories in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. in:The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories", pp.133~166 (2000), Academic Press
- Nikiforidou,K, "Nominalization, Metonymy and Lexicographic Practice. in:Issues in Cognitive Linguistics", pp.141~163 (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
- Quirk, R, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Ravelli,L, "Metaphor, Mode and Complexity: An Exploration of Co-varying Patterns", 석사, pp.1985
- Ross,J, "Nouniness. In Fujimura, O.(ed.), Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory", pp.137~257 (1973), TEC Company
- Taverniers,M, "Grammatical Metaphor in SFL: A Historiography of the Introduction and Initial Study of the Concept. ㅑㅜ:Grammatical Metaphor", pp.5~33 (2003), John Benjamins
- Yang,Y, "Typological Interpretation of Differences Between Chinese and English in Grammatical Metaphor", Language Sciences, 30, pp.450~478 (2008)
- Yoon.J, "A Restricted Theory of Morphosyntactic Interaction and Its Consequences", 석사, pp.1989