영어와 한국어의 능격 동사 비교
Comparison of Ergative Verbs between English and Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to review the previous research on Korean ergative verbs critically by comparison with those of English, and redefine the term of Korean ergative verbs. We have investigated the concept of ergativity in English and Korean and the concept of English ergative verbs has been applied to those of Korean and found out that some Korean scholars have used the term ‘ergative verbs’ in some constructions in Korean inappropriately. This can be sometimes confusing and misleading. We will propose the well redefined term of Korean ergative verbs as follows. First, Korean ergative verbs are derived from transitive verbs with overt morphological change or without that. Although they have natural verb alternation, if they need any agentivity in meaning they can’t be ergative verbs. Second, every ergative verbs must have event argument. So if they don’t have it, they should be ruled out from ergative verbs. Third, in connection with passive sentences, overt morphological change can’t be the criterion to decide whether they are ergative verbs or not. At this time the meaning is very important to decide ergativity. If they make good sense without the help of agentivity they can be ergative verbs.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to review the previous research on Korean ergative verbs critically by comparison with those of English, and redefine the term of Korean ergative verbs. We have investigated the concept of ergativity in English and Korean and the concept of English ergative verbs has been applied to those of Korean and found out that some Korean scholars have used the term ‘ergative verbs’ in some constructions in Korean inappropriately. This can be sometimes confusing and misleading. We will propose the well redefined term of Korean ergative verbs as follows. First, Korean ergative verbs are derived from transitive verbs with overt morphological change or without that. Although they have natural verb alternation, if they need any agentivity in meaning they can’t be ergative verbs. Second, every ergative verbs must have event argument. So if they don’t have it, they should be ruled out from ergative verbs. Third, in connection with passive sentences, overt morphological change can’t be the criterion to decide whether they are ergative verbs or not. At this time the meaning is very important to decide ergativity. If they make good sense without the help of agentivity they can be ergative verbs.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강명윤, "주격 보어에 관한 소고", 생성문법연구, 5(2), pp.391~417 (1995)
- 고광주, "국어의 능격성 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 고영근, "능격성과 통사구조", 한글, 192, pp.43~76 (1986)
- 김민수, "신국어학" (1964), 일조각
- 김석득, "자리 만듦성과 시킴월 되기 제약", 말, 5, pp.35~52 (1980)
- 박승윤, "‘시작하다’ 동사의 타동성 예외", 언어, 9(2) (1984)
- 연재훈, "고광주, 국어의 능격성 연구 , 月印, 2001, 273쪽", 형태론, 7(1), pp.207~221 (2005), 형태론
- 연재훈, "한국어에 능격성이 존재하는가 -능격의 개념과 그 오용", 한글, (282), pp.125~154 (2008), 한글학회
- 우형식, "국어 타동구문 연구" (1996), 도서출판 박이정
- 윤만근, "생성통사론", pp.655~695 (1996), 한국문화사
- 탁기현, "영어 결과문의 병치제약", 영어영문학연구, 52(1), pp.437~455 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 함희진, "국어의 능격성 도입에 관한 비판적 검토", 형태론, 7(2), pp.419~428 (2005), 형태론
- Ackema, P, "The Middle Construction and the Syntax-Semantics Interface", Lingua, 93, pp.59~90 (1994)
- Comrie,B, ""Ergativity,"Syntactic Typology:Studies in the Phenomenology of Language", pp.329~374 (1978), University of Texas Press
- Davidson,D, "“The Logical Form of Action Sentences,” The Logic and Action" (1967), University of Pittsburgh Press
- Dixon,R.M.W, "Ergativity.Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 69" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Dowty,D, "Word Meaning and Montague Grammar" (1979), Reidel Publishing Company
- Fagan,M, "The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions; A Study with Special Reference to German" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Higginbotham,J, "On Semantics", Linguistic Inquiry, 16, pp.547~593 (1985)
- Jesperson,O, "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part 3 Syntax" (1927), Carl Winter
- Keyer, S. J, "On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.381~416 (1984)
- Kim,Y.J, "The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Case: the Interpretation between Lexical and Syntactic Levels of Representation", 박사, pp.1990
- Kratzer, A, "Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates", 석사, pp.1989
- Levin, B, "The Formation of Adjectival Passives", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.623~661 (1986)
- Ortiz de Urbina,J, "Parameters in the Grammar of Basque:a GB approach to Basque syntax" (1989), Foris
- Perlmutter, D, "Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis", Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, pp.157~189 (1978)
- Ross, J, "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", 박사, pp.1967
- Shibatani, M, "Toward an Understanding of the Typology and Function of Case-Marking", The Proceedings of the VIIIth International Congress of Linguistics (1982)
- Vendler,Z, "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press