한국어와 태국어 명사화 구문 번역에 대한 고찰
A Study on the Translation of nominalized Sentence Structure of the Korean and the Thai.
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research was to examine the nominalized sentence structure of the Korean and the Thai and analyze and describe this and attempted to study the problems related to the translation. The nominalization of the Korean language is realized by ‘–음’, ‘-기’, ‘-은/는 것’ etc. and the nominalization of the Thai language is realized by การ/깐/ ความ/쾀/ การที่ /깐티/. The words nominalized by these have responsiveness to a certain extent between the Korean and the Thai, and when the attribute of the verb with which the noun speech element is combined is [+ motion], ‘-기’ of the Korean language responds to การ– of the Thai, and when it is [- motion], ‘–음’ of the Korean responds to ความ– of the Thai. However, when the words compose a sentence and function as ingredients of a sentence, some of them maintain the responsiveness, but some of them lose the responsiveness, and in some cases, they appear as other common noun rather than the noun derived by nominalization. As for the responsiveness in the nominalized sentence structure, การ– responds to ‘–음’, ‘-기’, ‘-은/는 것’ according to the context in many cases, and in the case of ความ–, not only its frequency of use is low but also when it is translated into the Korean, it responds to the simple noun separately rather than being translated into the nominalized derived noun. With regard to this, it is very important to find the criteria and principles that can explain the correlations more clearly.
Abstract
This research was to examine the nominalized sentence structure of the Korean and the Thai and analyze and describe this and attempted to study the problems related to the translation. The nominalization of the Korean language is realized by ‘–음’, ‘-기’, ‘-은/는 것’ etc. and the nominalization of the Thai language is realized by การ/깐/ ความ/쾀/ การที่ /깐티/. The words nominalized by these have responsiveness to a certain extent between the Korean and the Thai, and when the attribute of the verb with which the noun speech element is combined is [+ motion], ‘-기’ of the Korean language responds to การ– of the Thai, and when it is [- motion], ‘–음’ of the Korean responds to ความ– of the Thai. However, when the words compose a sentence and function as ingredients of a sentence, some of them maintain the responsiveness, but some of them lose the responsiveness, and in some cases, they appear as other common noun rather than the noun derived by nominalization. As for the responsiveness in the nominalized sentence structure, การ– responds to ‘–음’, ‘-기’, ‘-은/는 것’ according to the context in many cases, and in the case of ความ–, not only its frequency of use is low but also when it is translated into the Korean, it responds to the simple noun separately rather than being translated into the nominalized derived noun. With regard to this, it is very important to find the criteria and principles that can explain the correlations more clearly.
참고문헌 (28)
- 고경태, "한국어 교육을 위한 명사화소 ‘-음’, ‘-기’ 연구 ― 용언과의 패턴을 중심으로", 문법 교육, 8, pp.1~29 (2008), 한국문법교육학회
- 권재일, "한국어의 {기}-명사화 내포문 연구", 한글 (1981), 한글학회
- 민현식, "명사화, 국어연구 어디까지 왔나" (1990), 동아출판사
- 배희임, "국어 보문의 몇 가지 문제", 고대 어문논집, 22 (1981)
- 서정수, "국어 문법" (1994), 뿌리 깊은 나무
- 서정수, "현대국어문법론" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 서태룡, "국어 활용어미의 형태와 의미", 박사, pp.1987
- 송창선, "명사화소 ‘-(으)ㅁ, -기’의 통사 특성", 국어교육연구, 22 (1990), 국어교육학회
- 심재기, "명사화의 의미기능", 언어, 5(1) (1980)
- 심재기, "국어어휘론" (1982), 집문당
- 양동휘, "On Complementizers in Korean", 언어, 1(2) (1975)
- 우형식, "명사화소 ‘-(으)ㅁ’, ‘-기’의 분포와 의미기능", 말, 12 (1987), 연세대학교 한국어학당
- 이맹성, "Nominalization in Korea", 어학연구, 4(1) (1968)
- 임홍빈, "명사화의 의미특성에 대하여", 국어학, 2 (1974)
- 장석진, "Some Remarks on Korean Nominalization", 어학연구, 2(1) (1966)
- 정환승, "현대태국어문법론" (2002), 삼지사
- 정환승, "한국학생들의 태국어 학습시 나타나는 오류분석", 한국태국학회논총, (12) (2005)
- 차상호, "기초 태국어" (1998), 삼지사
- 채완, "명사화소 “-기”에 대하여", 국어학, 8 (1979)
- 채완, "명사화소의 의미기능", 언어, 5(1) (1980)
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음사
- 홍종선, "명사화 어미의 변천", 국어국문학, 89 (1983)
- 홍종선, "명사화어미 ‘-(으)ㅁ’, ‘-기’", 언어, 8(2) (1983)
- ธนพล จาดใจดี, "ESSAY ON THAILAND, (เรื่องราวต่าง ๆ เกี่ยวกับ ระเทศไทย)" (1999), Chulalongkorn University Press
- กำชัย ทองหล่อ, "หลักภาษาไทย. กรุงเทพมหานคร : รวมสาส์น. ๒๕๔๐ นววรรณ พันธุเมธา. ไวยากรณ์ภาษาไทย.กรุงเทพมหานคร: รุ่งเรืองสาส์น การพิมพ์. ๒๕๒๗", ~
- บรรจบ พันธุเมธา., "ลักษณะภาษาไทย", โรงพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัย คำแหง
- "พระยาอุปกิจศิลปสาร. หลักภาษาไทย.กรุงเทพมหานคร: ไทยวัฒนพานิช ๓๓", ~
- "เปียพงษ์ เลาศรีรัตนชัย, การวิเคราะห์การปรากฏร่วมระหว่างคำกับหน่วยคำ ปลงเป็นนาม การ และความ. ๒๕๕๔", ~