한국 공적연금 제도발전을 위한 영향요인 분석: 기본소득연금을 중심으로
Analysis of Influencing Factors for the Development of Korea's Public Pension System: Focusing on the Basic Income Pension
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) This study aimed to compare the perceptions of public pensioners and national pensioners on the Western basic income pension system linked to the basic income system and to seek strategies and measures for establishing Korea's basic income pension system. (Design/methodology/approach) In this study, the AHP structure diagram consisted of three primary factors, six secondary factors, and 18 tertiary factors. This study presented implications by conducting an importance analysis according to the AHP technique on a total of 40 subjects, including 20 public pensioners and 20 national pensioners (Findings) As a result of comparing the importance among pensioners, public pensioners generally have a high distribution of importance to financial factors. On the other hand, national pensioners share the importance of each factor in various ways. The importance of all groups also emphasizes financial factors overall, but it is analyzed that strategies for pension policy, which is a political and social factor, and extension of retirement age by pension guarantee, which is a social and institutional factor, are also important. (Research implications or Originality) Based on the results of these AHP studies, this study discussed developmental suggestions and policy implications for the composition of Korea's basic income pension system. First, it is necessary to propose a plan to unify various systems so that pensions can be received in the range of 18.3% to 18.5% like the basic income guarantee system in Western countries. Second, it is politically and socially important to establish a pension policy strategy to build a social safety net for basic income pensions in preparation for the pension welfare society and to operate pension policies consistently. Finally, the government needs to further strengthen the payment of guarantees for basic income pensions and secure new pension finances such as carbon tax and social welfare tax.
Abstract
(Purpose) This study aimed to compare the perceptions of public pensioners and national pensioners on the Western basic income pension system linked to the basic income system and to seek strategies and measures for establishing Korea's basic income pension system. (Design/methodology/approach) In this study, the AHP structure diagram consisted of three primary factors, six secondary factors, and 18 tertiary factors. This study presented implications by conducting an importance analysis according to the AHP technique on a total of 40 subjects, including 20 public pensioners and 20 national pensioners (Findings) As a result of comparing the importance among pensioners, public pensioners generally have a high distribution of importance to financial factors. On the other hand, national pensioners share the importance of each factor in various ways. The importance of all groups also emphasizes financial factors overall, but it is analyzed that strategies for pension policy, which is a political and social factor, and extension of retirement age by pension guarantee, which is a social and institutional factor, are also important. (Research implications or Originality) Based on the results of these AHP studies, this study discussed developmental suggestions and policy implications for the composition of Korea's basic income pension system. First, it is necessary to propose a plan to unify various systems so that pensions can be received in the range of 18.3% to 18.5% like the basic income guarantee system in Western countries. Second, it is politically and socially important to establish a pension policy strategy to build a social safety net for basic income pensions in preparation for the pension welfare society and to operate pension policies consistently. Finally, the government needs to further strengthen the payment of guarantees for basic income pensions and secure new pension finances such as carbon tax and social welfare tax.
참고문헌 (45)
- Altenkamp, S., "Basic Income Guarantee, Self-Employment and Enterpreneurship-Lessons to be learned from the Namibian BIG Experiment", Paper Presented at the Thirteenth BIEN Congress, pp.1~20 (2010), FEA-USP
- 배준호, "주요국 연금체계와 개혁이 주는 시사점", 응용경제, 7(2), pp.111~152 (2005), 한국응용경제학회
- Lee Seong-woo, "Agreed on a Need to Introduce 'Basic Income,' Divided Clearly among Different Ways", Bokji Times, ~ (2020)
- Lee Seok-won, "Living in Sweden, A Conservative Party Not Giving Up on Welfare", Dailian, ~ (2019)
- Trends of Social Security Policies around the Globe: An Annual Report, "Department of Welfare Policies, Ministry of Health and Welfare", ~ (2019)
- Seo Yeong-ha, "Combination of Flat Rate and Income Related Pension, the Secret of Japan's Strong Pension Is a Multi-Layered Structure", Dong-a Ilbo, ~ (2018)
- 2013 'Long-Term Financial Projection Report" of Financial Projection Committee of National Pension, "Financial Projection Committee of National Pension", ~ (2013)
- Go Jae-seong, "A Study on Key Nations' Reform Plans for Public Pension", Korean Pension Association, 7(2), pp.53~81 (2017)
- Hong Ji-yeong, "A Study on the Directionality of Public Pension based on Pension Reform by the Welfare State System", master's, pp.2011
- Public and Private Pension Systems in Foreign Countries I, "Jeong Chang-ryul", National Pension Research Institute, ~ (2012)
- Jeong Gyu-myeong, "A Study on Reform Plans for the Public Pension System -With a focus on the National Pension System of South Korea", doctor's, pp.2005
- Jeong Hyeon-myeong, "A Study on Improvement Measures for the Basic Old-Age Pension Law", doctor's, pp.2013
- 정주호, "ACMS 모형을 활용한 정책변동과정 분석: 4차 공무원연금개혁을 중심으로", 국정관리연구, 12(3), pp.109~139 (2017), 성균관대학교 국정전문대학원[DOI]
- 조추용, "일본의 연금개혁과 노후생활보장정책", 노인복지연구, (32), pp.31~68 (2006), 한국노인복지학회
- 주상현, "공기업 경쟁력 영향요인분석과 정책적 함의 - 한국철도공사를 중심으로-", 한국비교정부학보, 19(4), pp.317~341 (2015), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- Issues and Implications of Alternative Income Security Arrangements, "Kang Shin-wook", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, ~, pp.Research Report(spot), 2016-08 (2016)
- Sweeping Top 10%...Changed South Korea from the 1980s, "KBS", 2019
- 김수봉, "현 노령층을 위한 최저연금제도 도입 방안", 사회보장연구, 23(1), pp.153~175 (2007), 한국사회보장학회
- Kim Yong-rae, "Encyclopedia of Korean Culture" (1995)
- 김중석, "공무원연금, 봉급 및 공공봉사동기가 직무만족에 미치는 영향 - 전주지역 소방공무원을 중심으로 -", 한국자치행정학보, 30(2), pp.279~298 (2016), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
- Kipping, K., "Moving to Basic Income-A left wing political perspective", BIEN Congress (2008)
- Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, "Revision(Revised Plan) of National Pension by Korean Confederation of Trade Unions", ~ (2006)
- 이재은, "발전원별 사회적 위험도에 대한 상대적 심각성 분석: AHP 기법을 활용하여", 한국행정학보, 41(1), pp.113~132 (2007), 한국행정학회
- 이재영, "AHP를 이용한 도시내 도로사업 평가모형구축 및 중요도 인식특성 분석", 국토계획, 41(2), pp.227~236 (2006), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 이명현, "유럽에서의 기본소득(Basic Income) 구상의 전개 동향과", 사회보장연구, 23(3), pp.147~169 (2007), 한국사회보장학회
- Lee Myeong-hyeon, "A Study on Priority Setting to Introduce Basic Income in South Korea", Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 38(2), pp.39~64 (2011)
- Lee Myeong-hyeon, "A Study on Expert Evaluation for Basic Income System Strategies in South Korea and Japan", Korean Health and Social Welfare Review, 31(14), pp.285~314 (2011)
- Jo Yun-yeong, "How Japan Reformed National Pension: 'National Consensus' after 30 Years of Discussions", Newsis, ~ (2018)
- Saaty, Thomas L., "Decision Making for Leader: The AHP for Decisions in a Complex World" (1982), Wadsworth
- 석재은, "기본소득에 관한 다양한 제안의 평가와 과도기적 기본소득의 제안: 청장년 근로시민 기본소득이용권", 보건사회연구, 38(2), pp.103~132 (2018), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- Seo Jeong-hee, "Basic Income Is Coming: New Imagination about Distribution", Social Review Academy (2018)
- Jeong Hyeon-yong, "Military Pension Run Dry 45 Times...'Calm Zone of Reform' with 80% or more Covered by the State", Seoul Shinmun, ~ (2018)
- Shin Jong-Tae, "A Study on Problems with Relief Measures for Elderly Poverty and Income Security Policies", master's, pp.2008
- Statistics Korea, "the raw. data of 2006 and 2015 "Household Income and Expenditure Survey."", ~
- 오철기, "A Study on Issues and Plans in the Integration of Public Pensions", 한국비교정부학보, 23(3), pp.415~445 (2019), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- Oh Choul-ki, "Analysis of the Integration Factors of Public Pension in Importance", doctor's, pp.2020
- 오철기, "공적연금 통합요인 우선순위 분석", 한국비교정부학보, 24(3), pp.305~324 (2020), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- Oh Geon-ho, "A Basic Pension-Centric Income Security Theory for the Elderly", Korean journal of Public Finance, Seminar, pp.13~34 (2016)
- Oh Geon-ho, "Public Pension I Make: Preparations for Old Age in the Era of Employment Instability and Tasks for This Generation" (2016), Chaeksesang
- Oh Seok-hong, "Administrative Reform Theories" (1997), PAKYOUNGSA
- "The Feasibility of a Basic Income" (2010)[URL]
- Yun Hong-shik, "Can Basic Income Be an Alternative of a Welfare State?", Journal of Critical Social Welfare, 54, pp.81~119 (2017)
- Yu Yeong-jun, "A Study on Factors Influencing User Satisfaction with the Food Safety Korea Portal: With a focus on priority analysis with AHP", master's, pp.2016
- Wilson, S., "The struggle over Work : The End of ‘Work’ and Employment Alternatives for Post-industrial Societies" (2004), Routledge
- The Current Management and Implications of Minimum Income Security Systems in OECD Member States, "Woo Hae-bong", National Pension Research Institute, ~ (2012)