Comparative Analysis of Public Healthcare Service Delivery Systems in France and Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) This study aims to present the direction of future public healthcare service delivery systems through in-depth comparative analysis in France and Korea. Through this paper, we aims to understand how government and market relationships are established to provide social services in the two countries. We also expect to be able to identify its differential characteristics. (Design/methodology/approach) A two-step qualitative approach is conducted. First, the research examines the commonalities and differences of the public healthcare service delivery system in France and Korea, which are considered as social insurance-based welfare states. Second, the study evaluates the role of the state-to-market among countries with similar social welfare systems. For the comparison, Germany and Japan, social insurance-based welfare states, are chosen as the comparative groups. (Findings) The characteristics of the public healthcare service delivery system in France and Korea are analyzed. Additionally, the level of government intervention in the public healthcare service delivery systems is measured. According to the analysis, France has a low rate of self-charge, and the proportion of healthcare, public hospitals, and public beds among public funds was high. Therefore, France is more of a complete government intervention model. Subsequently, in Korea, the percentage of self-payment was high, and the percentage of healthcare, public hospitals, and public beds was low among public funds. Thus, Korea is close to a complete market intervention model and has the opposite public healthcare service delivery system compared to France. (Research implications or Originality) This study presents some rationales for expanding public hospitals and beds in align with the reinforcement of the publicness of health service. The two-stage qualitative analysis methodology identified the characteristics of the public healthcare service delivery systems of both countries.
Abstract
(Purpose) This study aims to present the direction of future public healthcare service delivery systems through in-depth comparative analysis in France and Korea. Through this paper, we aims to understand how government and market relationships are established to provide social services in the two countries. We also expect to be able to identify its differential characteristics. (Design/methodology/approach) A two-step qualitative approach is conducted. First, the research examines the commonalities and differences of the public healthcare service delivery system in France and Korea, which are considered as social insurance-based welfare states. Second, the study evaluates the role of the state-to-market among countries with similar social welfare systems. For the comparison, Germany and Japan, social insurance-based welfare states, are chosen as the comparative groups. (Findings) The characteristics of the public healthcare service delivery system in France and Korea are analyzed. Additionally, the level of government intervention in the public healthcare service delivery systems is measured. According to the analysis, France has a low rate of self-charge, and the proportion of healthcare, public hospitals, and public beds among public funds was high. Therefore, France is more of a complete government intervention model. Subsequently, in Korea, the percentage of self-payment was high, and the percentage of healthcare, public hospitals, and public beds was low among public funds. Thus, Korea is close to a complete market intervention model and has the opposite public healthcare service delivery system compared to France. (Research implications or Originality) This study presents some rationales for expanding public hospitals and beds in align with the reinforcement of the publicness of health service. The two-stage qualitative analysis methodology identified the characteristics of the public healthcare service delivery systems of both countries.
참고문헌 (31)
- 배준구, "프랑스 지방분권 이후 지방자치단체의 개혁과 특징: 2003년 지방분권 개헌을 중심으로", 프랑스 문화 연구, (24), pp.69~95 (2012), 한국프랑스문화학회[DOI]
- Choi Young-joon, "France's Welfare State Reform Efforts and the General Social Contribution", International Social Security Review, 6, pp.57~65 (2018)
- 최영준, "사회과학에서 퍼지셋 활용의 모색: 퍼지 이상형 분석과 결합 요인 분석을 중심으로", 정부학연구, 15(3), pp.307~336 (2009), 정부학연구소
- DREES, "Les etablissement de sante, edition 2020", ~ (2020)
- Esping-Andersen, G., "The three worlds of welfare capitalism" (1990), Princeton University Press
- Esping-Andersen, G., "Social Risks and Welfare States" (1999), Oxford University Press
- 은재호, "프랑스 복지행정의 이념과 실용주의: 신자유주의의 수용과 전유를 통한 대안적 모델의 건설과정", 한국행정학보, 43(1), pp.69~96 (2009), 한국행정학회
- Han Seung-jun, "Articles of General Interest : A study on the convergence of welfare models : welfare reform in France", Korea Journal of Public Policy, 11(3), pp.1~21 (2002)
- 홍승아, "복지국가 재편과 젠더: 프랑스 보육정책을 중심으로", 여성연구, 2(69), pp.139~174 (2005), 한국여성정책연구원
- 임도빈, "질적 연구 방법의 내용과 적용전략: 양적인 질적 연구와질적인 질적 연구", 정부학연구, 15(1), pp.155~187 (2009), 정부학연구소
- 전학선, "프랑스 지방분권개혁의 최근 동향과 한국에의 시사점", 공법학연구, 16(3), pp.3~32 (2015), 한국비교공법학회[DOI]
- Social Policy in France, "KIHASA", KIHASA, ~ (2019)
- French medical service and its implication, "Kim Dae-joong", 1~8, pp.Issue &Focus, 163 (2012)
- Kim Tae-sung, "Welfare State" (2003), Nanam
- 김연명, "한국 복지국가의 성격과 전망: 남부유럽복지체제와의 비교를 중심으로", 한국사회복지조사연구, 36, pp.27~59 (2013), 사회복지연구소
- Kvist, J., "Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s : Using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types", Journal of European Social Policy, 9(3), pp.231~252 (1999)
- 권혁주, "정책수단의 정치적 성격", 한국행정논집, 21(4), pp.1301~1319 (2009), 한국정부학회
- 이은주, "프랑스 복지정책의 사회연대개념과 실천적 함의", 보건사회연구, 34(1), pp.74~104 (2014), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- 이광윤, "지방분권 개헌에 관한 논의 ― 국회 개헌특위 자문위원회 시안 및 정부의 개헌안을 중심으로 ―", 공법연구, 46(4), pp.121~148 (2018), 한국공법학회
- 이유현, "공상공무원 재활정책 설계 연구 : 프랑스 경찰공무원 사례분석을 중심으로", 한국정책학회보, 29(2), pp.189~222 (2020), 한국정책학회[DOI]
- A Study on the Reorganization of Social Service Delevery Systems, "Lee Chae-jeong", National Assembly Futures Institute, ~ (2020)
- Oh young ho, "Problem with and Policy Agenda for public healthcare services in Korea", Public Health Forum, 200, pp.62~82 (2013)
- Ragin, C. C., "Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal complexity", Health services research, 34, pp.1225~
- Salter, B., "The politics of change in the health service" (1998), Palgrave
- Sapir, A., "Globalisation and the Reform of European Social Model" (2005), Bruegel
- The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine, "Preventive Medicine" (2002), Kyechukmoonhwasa
- Wilding, P., "Is the East Asian welfare model still productive?", Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(1), pp.18~31 (2008)
- "French Ministry of Health"[URL]
- "OECD's health spending indicator data (doi: 10.1787", 8643de7e-en) of 2021)
- "OECD health statistics data"[URL]