6·25전쟁기 마오쩌둥(毛澤東)의 군사분계선 설정 전략

Abstract

This study is to find out the implications of Mao Zedong, who tried to close the armistice agreement early in the early period of discussions on the armistice negotiations (June-10, 1951), and why it was impossible to conclude the military demarcation line early. Have. Since June 1951, when discussions on armistice negotiations were held within North Korea, China, and the Soviet Union during the Korean War, the study investigated whether or not Mao Zedong agreed to’debate on establishing a divisional demarcation line’ and the dynamics of Mao Zedong and Stalin. Dealing with. During the Korean War, the Soviet Union as a supporter of the war, China as a supporter of the war, and North Korea’s political leaders, which were parties to the war, formed a hierarchical relationship ranging from Stalin-Mao Zedong-Kim Il-sung, and this was the result of the five times of the Chinese campaign. Unlike the period during which the campaign was performed (1950.10.~1951.5), there is a new aspect that emerged in the early stages of the armistice negotiations when the demarcation line was established. Mao Zedong thought that if the ‘Agenda for Armistice Negotiation’ was decided and the discussion on ‘Establishing the Military Demarcation Line’ started, an armistice agreement could be concluded as soon as possible. However, the process was not smooth. On the other side, Mao Zedong’s China-centered military demarcation line overlooking the Korean Peninsula aims to establish an optimal military demarcation line from a geopolitical point of view on the Korean peninsula. It was intended to establish an armistice agreement. In a situation where the time to conclude the armistice negotiations is delayed due to the integration of Stalin’s global strategy, the military demarcation line is established around the contact line with the U.S. forces, but the strategy is to secure strategic areas in the western region. It follows Stalin’s intentions, but tries to create conditions for an early blackout internally.