미래 시제와 인식 양태의 통합적 분석: ‘(으)ㄹ 것이’
On the Interrelationship between Epistemic Future and Epistemic Modality: The Case of (u)l-kes-i
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of the current paper is to investigate a unified analysis of integrated meaning of future prediction and epistemic modality in Korean. In particular, we focus on the case of the periphrastic construction (u)l-kes-i ‘will/must’. Importantly, when the past tense morpheme ess/ass combines with (u)l-kes-i, only the epistemic reading arises. Given the set of empirical data, we address the following questions: First, how are the future prediction meaning and the epistemic modal meaning related each other? Second, what is the licensing condition of (u)l-kes-i? For the answers to the questions, we suggest the following: First, the default meaning of (u)l-kes-i is that of epistemic modality. Second, by adding to the specific prospective aspect operator, we can get the future prediction reading and solve the puzzle on the case of past tense morpheme. The theoretical implication of current work is that from the crosslinguistic view, Korean data can suggest an extended spectrum of the conceptual relation between the future prediction and the epistemic modal in a unified way.
Abstract
The goal of the current paper is to investigate a unified analysis of integrated meaning of future prediction and epistemic modality in Korean. In particular, we focus on the case of the periphrastic construction (u)l-kes-i ‘will/must’. Importantly, when the past tense morpheme ess/ass combines with (u)l-kes-i, only the epistemic reading arises. Given the set of empirical data, we address the following questions: First, how are the future prediction meaning and the epistemic modal meaning related each other? Second, what is the licensing condition of (u)l-kes-i? For the answers to the questions, we suggest the following: First, the default meaning of (u)l-kes-i is that of epistemic modality. Second, by adding to the specific prospective aspect operator, we can get the future prediction reading and solve the puzzle on the case of past tense morpheme. The theoretical implication of current work is that from the crosslinguistic view, Korean data can suggest an extended spectrum of the conceptual relation between the future prediction and the epistemic modal in a unified way.
참고문헌 (53)
- Bochnak, Ryan, "Underspecified modality in Washo", Proceedings of the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, 18, pp.3~17 (2015), UBCWPL
- Bocknak, Ryan, "Future reference with and without future marking", Lang Linguist Compass, pp.1~22 (2019)
- Broekhuis, Hans, "Binary tense and modality", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, pp.973~1009 (2014)
- Bybee, Joan, "The evolution of future meaning", John Benjamins, pp.109~122 (1987)
- Bybee, Joan, "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Chang, Kyung hee, "hyentaykwukeuy yangthaypemcwu yenkwu (A study on the category of modality in modern Korean)" (1985), Thap chwulphansa
- Comrie, Bernard, "Tense" (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Condoravdi, Cleo, "The construction of meaning", pp.59~87 (2002), CSLI Publications
- Copley, Bridget, "The semantics of the future" (2002)
- Enç, Murvet, "The handbook of contemporary semantic theory", pp.345~358 (1996), Blackwell
- Fǎlǎus, Anamaria, "Presumptive mood, factivity and epistemic indefinites in Romanian", Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 3(2), pp.105~124 (2014)
- Giannakidou, Aanastasia, "A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality: The view from Greek and Italian", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 36(1), pp.85~129 (2018)
- Goodhue, Daniel, "Must φ is felicitous only if φ is not known", Semantics and Pragmatics, 10(14) (2017)
- Haegeman, Liliane, "The Semantics of Will in Present-day English: A Unified Account" (1983), Royal Academy of Belgium
- Han, Dongwan, "Kwukeuy Sicey Yenkwu (A study on the tense in Korean)" (1996), Thayhaksa
- 허세문, "A Scope-based Approach to the Interaction of Modal and Aspect in Korean", 언어, 42(4), pp.927~959 (2017), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Hong, Jongseon, "Kwukeuy Sicey, Sang, Sepep (Tense, aspect and mood in Korean)" (2009), Pakmwunsa
- Ippolito, Michela, "Epistemic stance without epistemic modality: The Presumptive Future in Italian and Romanian" (2018), handout, ModUnuil
- Kim, Johnghyun, "hankwukeuy milay sikan cisi phyohyen yenkwu (Expressing future time in Korean: a study on ‘-keyss-’, ‘-(u)l kesi-’, ‘-neu-’ and ∅)", MA, pp.2015
- Kiparsky, Paul, "Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology", pp.345~369 (1971), University Press
- Kissine, Mikhail, "Why will is not a modal", Natural Language Semantics, 16(2), pp.129~155 (2008)
- Klecha, Peter, "Diagnosing modality in predictive expressions", Journal of Semantics, 31, pp.443~455 (2014)
- Ko, Yong-Kun., "hankwukeuy sicey sepep tongcaksang (Tense, mood and aspect in Korean)" (2007), Thayhaksa
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches to Word Semantics", pp.163~201 (1981), Walter de Gruyter
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research" (1991), de Gruyter
- Kush, Dave, "Height‐relative determination of (non‐root) modal flavor: Evidence from Hindi", Proceedings of Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, 21, pp.413~425 (2011), CLC Publications
- Lederer, Herbert, "Reference grammar of the German language" (1969), Charles Scribner’s Sons
- 이정훈, "統辭構造와 時制 解釋", 어문연구(語文硏究), 42(1), pp.63~91 (2014), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- Lee, Ik-Sup, "Kwukemwunpeplon (Grammar in Korean)" (1983), Hakyensa
- Lee, Jaeseong, "Hankwukeuy Siceywa Sang (Tense and aspect in Korean)" (2001), Kwukhakcalyowen
- Lyons, John, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Matthewson, Lisa, "Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language", Linguistics and Philosophy, 29, pp.673~713 (2006)
- Matthewson, Lisa, "Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16 Cambridge", pp.431~446 (2012), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
- Matthewson, Lisa, "Gitksan modals", International Journal of American Linguistics, 79(3), pp.349~394 (2013)
- Mihoc, Teodora, "Epistemic modals, deduction, and factivity: New insights from the epistemic future", Proceedings of SALT, 29, pp.351~370 (2019)
- Mihoc, Teodora, "The Romanian Presumptive Mood: Inferential evidentiality and upper-end degree epistemic modality", MA, pp.2012
- Mihoc, Teodora, "The Romanian future-and-presumptive auxiliary", McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 24(1), pp.64~80 (2014)
- Mucha, Anne, "Temporal interpretation in Hausa", Linguistics and Philosophy, 36, pp.371~415 (2013)
- Mucha, Anne, "Temporal interpretation and cross‐linguistic variation", pp.2015
- Mucha, Anne, "Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20", pp.533~550 (2016), University of Tübingen
- 문숙영, "한국어 시제 범주 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2005
- 명정희, "‘-을 것이-’ 構文의 樣態와 時制 解釋", 어문연구(語文硏究), 49(1), pp.7~37 (2021), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- Palmer, Frank, "Mood and modality" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, Frank, "Mood and modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Portner, Paul, "Modality" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Prior, Arthur, "Time and Modality" (1967), Oxford University Press
- Salkie, Raphael, "Will: Tense or modal or both?", English Language and Linguistics, 14, pp.187~215 (2010)
- Son, Hye Ok, "hankwuke yangthaypemcwu yenkwu (A study on Korean modality as a grammatical category)", PhD., pp.2016
- Thomason, Richmond, "Indeterminist time and truth‐value gaps", Theoria, 36(3), pp.264~281 (1970)
- von Fintel, Kai, "Must... stay... strong!", Natural language semantics, 18(4), pp.351~383 (2010)
- Winans, Lauren D., "Inferences of will", PhD., pp.2016
- 이남순, "현대국어의 시제와 상에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1981
- Yi, Nam-Soon, "Sicey·Sang·Sepep (Tense, aspect and mood)" (1998), Welin