독도 영유권 주장의 비판적 담화 분석:한일 외교 당국 웹사이트에 소개된 근거자료를 중심으로
Critical discourse analysis of sovereignty claims over Dokdo/Takeshima: With the focus on Korean and Japanese foreign ministries’ websites
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates what discursive strategies Korea and Japan’s foreign ministries employ to make conflicting sovereignty claims over Dokdo/Takeshima, although they base their arguments on the same historical evidence. The subjects of the study are the historical records and international agreements that the two countries’ foreign ministries commonly mention on their websites. By employing Halliday’s systemic functional grammar, this study analyzes what lexical choices were made and what process types were employed when old documents, Dokdo/Takeshima, Ahn Yong-bok (a fisherman of Joseon), international agreements were presented as participants in sentences. The results show that Korea’s foreign ministry emphasizes historical facts and events to support its claims, while its Japanese counterpart focuses on San Francisco Peace Agreement. Korea mainly uses material and verbal processes to present what were recorded on old documents. Although Japan uses the same two process types, it also employes modality and negative additives to undermine the reliability of old Korean records. When describing Dokdo/Takeshima, both Korea and Japan mainly used relational process. However, Korea describes historical events as the islets’ attribute, while Japan presents the facts about Takeshima such as natural environment and location as attribute. Japan utilized various types of processes to explain San Francisco Peace Agreement to emphasize its significance.
Abstract
This study investigates what discursive strategies Korea and Japan’s foreign ministries employ to make conflicting sovereignty claims over Dokdo/Takeshima, although they base their arguments on the same historical evidence. The subjects of the study are the historical records and international agreements that the two countries’ foreign ministries commonly mention on their websites. By employing Halliday’s systemic functional grammar, this study analyzes what lexical choices were made and what process types were employed when old documents, Dokdo/Takeshima, Ahn Yong-bok (a fisherman of Joseon), international agreements were presented as participants in sentences. The results show that Korea’s foreign ministry emphasizes historical facts and events to support its claims, while its Japanese counterpart focuses on San Francisco Peace Agreement. Korea mainly uses material and verbal processes to present what were recorded on old documents. Although Japan uses the same two process types, it also employes modality and negative additives to undermine the reliability of old Korean records. When describing Dokdo/Takeshima, both Korea and Japan mainly used relational process. However, Korea describes historical events as the islets’ attribute, while Japan presents the facts about Takeshima such as natural environment and location as attribute. Japan utilized various types of processes to explain San Francisco Peace Agreement to emphasize its significance.
참고문헌 (30)
- Norman Fairclough, "대중매체 담화분석" (2004), 한국문화사
- 이창수, "비평담화분석을 위한 동사성 분석의 의미론적 모델 연구", 언어와언어학, (56), pp.253~282 (2012), 언어연구소
- 이창수, "국내 신문기사의 정치적 이데올로기에 관한 비평담화분석연구", 언어와언어학, (58), pp.313~344 (2013), 언어연구소
- 정민정, "독도 문제의 국제사법재판소 회부를 둘러싼 쟁점 및 대응방안", 국제법학회논총, 58(1), pp.117~143 (2013), 대한국제법학회
- 정병준, "샌프란시스코 평화조약과 독도", 독도연구, (18), pp.135~166 (2015), 독도연구소
- 송휘영, "한일 양국 정부의 독도 홍보사이트의 비교검토", 독도연구, (18), pp.267~289 (2015), 독도연구소
- 2014, , ~
- Elena Smirnova, "기능문법의 개념과 이론" (2015), 한국문화사
- Barkho, Leon, "The role of internal guidelines in shaping news narratives : Ethnographic insights into the discursive rhetoric of Middle East reporting by the BBC and Al-Jazeera English", Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), pp.297~309 (2011)
- Beldarrain-Durandegui, Angel, "We and them rhetoric in a left-wing secessionist newspaper: a comparative analysis of Basque and Spanish language editorials", Critical Discourse Studies, 9(1), pp.59~75 (2012)
- Chouliaraki, Lilie, "Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking" (1999), Edinburgh University Press
- Fairclough, Norman, "Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis", pp.121~138 (2001), Sage Publications
- Fowler, R., "Language in the News: Discourse and ideology in the press" (1991), Routledge
- Halliday, Michael, "Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective" (1985), Deakin University Press
- Halliday, Michael, "An introduction to functional grammar" (1994), Edward Arnold
- Halliday, Michael, "An introduction to functional grammar" (2004), Oxford University Press
- KhosraviNik, Majid, "Discourse, identity and legitimacy: Self and other in representations of Iran’s nuclear programme. Vol. 62" (2015), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Li, Juan, "Collision of language in news discourse: A functional–cognitive perspective on transitivity", Critical Discourse Studies, 8(3), pp.203~219 (2011)
- Mayr, Andrea, "Language and power : An Introduction to institutional discourse. London : Continuum" (2008), Continuum
- Schäffner, Christina, "Political discourse analysis from the point of view of translation studies", Journal of Language and Politics, 3(1), pp.117~150 (2004)
- Spiessens, Anneleen, "Translating news discourse on the Crimean crisis: Patterns of reframing on the Russian website InoSMI", The Translator, 22(3), pp.319~339 (2016)
- Tompson, Geoff, "Introducing functional grammar" (2014), Routledge
- Van Dijk, Teun A., "What is political discourse analysis", Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), pp.11~52 (1997)
- Van Dijk, Teun A, "Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach" (1998), Sage
- Wang, Guofeng, "Discursive construction of territorial disputes: Foreign newspaper reporting on the Diaoyu", Senkaku Islands dispute, 2017, 1~19
- "노무현 대통령의 단호한 독도 연설, ‘독도는 역사입니다’" (2006)[URL]
- "日, 평창 올림픽 홈피 ‘독도’ 표기 또 문제 삼아" (2017)[URL]
- "Usage and population statistics: World users by language" (2015)[URL]
- "Korea’s Position on Dokdo –Government’s Basic Position" (2017)[URL]
- "Japanese Territory – Takeshima Top, Takeshima Information, Takeshima Dispute, Q&A About the Takeshima" (2017)[URL]