대북 평화․비핵화 메시지의 담화분석: 설득을 위한 언어 및 담화 전략과 효과에서의 한계
A Discourse Analysis of Peace Process and Denuclearization Messages to North Korea: Linguistic and Discoursal Strategies for Persuasion, and the Limits of their Effects
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study explores the strategies for, and limitations of, persuasion in messages concerning the peace process and denuclearization sent by Jae-In Moon, the President of the Republic of Korea, to North Korea. After analyzing the linguistic and discoursal strategies he used to achieve his goals in terms of the three aspects of ‘field’,‘mode’ and ‘tenor’ (Halliday & Hasan 1985), this article examines possible reasons for the partial successes achieved during the course of some peace process and the ultimate failure of attempts to realize North Korean denuclearization. Detailed analysis of nineteen speeches and remarks made by the President reveals that at least six macro-acts (including ‘presenting visions’ and ‘guaranteeing North Korea’s security’), seven cognitive and pragmatic strategies (such as ‘recontextualization’, ‘topos’ and ‘rhetoric of temporality’) and three interpersonal strategies (‘effective stance’, ‘politeness’ and ‘emphasizing ethnic identity’) can be identified respectively in each of the three aspects. The first half of the discussion reexamines these linguistic and discoursal strategies using Aristotle’s theory of rhetoric and suggests how the four elements of ‘logos’, ‘ethos’, ‘pathos’, and ‘timing’ might have contributed to the brevity of ‘honeymoon’ period between the two Koreas. The second half of the discussion applies Mitchell (2000)’s theory of analysis of conflicts and suggests that his notion of ‘respondibility’, among others, explains the ultimate failure of the peace process as a whole. This article concludes with two insights derived from an analysis of the nature of peace discourse and a social-psychological approach to persuasion.
Abstract
The present study explores the strategies for, and limitations of, persuasion in messages concerning the peace process and denuclearization sent by Jae-In Moon, the President of the Republic of Korea, to North Korea. After analyzing the linguistic and discoursal strategies he used to achieve his goals in terms of the three aspects of ‘field’,‘mode’ and ‘tenor’ (Halliday & Hasan 1985), this article examines possible reasons for the partial successes achieved during the course of some peace process and the ultimate failure of attempts to realize North Korean denuclearization. Detailed analysis of nineteen speeches and remarks made by the President reveals that at least six macro-acts (including ‘presenting visions’ and ‘guaranteeing North Korea’s security’), seven cognitive and pragmatic strategies (such as ‘recontextualization’, ‘topos’ and ‘rhetoric of temporality’) and three interpersonal strategies (‘effective stance’, ‘politeness’ and ‘emphasizing ethnic identity’) can be identified respectively in each of the three aspects. The first half of the discussion reexamines these linguistic and discoursal strategies using Aristotle’s theory of rhetoric and suggests how the four elements of ‘logos’, ‘ethos’, ‘pathos’, and ‘timing’ might have contributed to the brevity of ‘honeymoon’ period between the two Koreas. The second half of the discussion applies Mitchell (2000)’s theory of analysis of conflicts and suggests that his notion of ‘respondibility’, among others, explains the ultimate failure of the peace process as a whole. This article concludes with two insights derived from an analysis of the nature of peace discourse and a social-psychological approach to persuasion.
참고문헌 (60)
- Bairner, Alan, "Sport, the Northern Ireland Peace Process, and the Politics of Identity", Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 5(4), pp.220~229 (2013)
- Barak, Oren, "The Failure of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process, 1993-2000", Journal of Peace Research, 42(6), pp.719~736 (2005)
- Billig, Michael, "The Language of Critical Discourse Analysis: the Case of Nominalization", Discourse & Society, 19(6), pp.783~800 (2008)
- Brown, Penelope, "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Burroughs, Elaine, "Discursive Representations of ‘Illegal Immigration’ in the Irish Newsprint Media: The Domination and Multiple Facets of the ‘Control’Argumentation", Discourse & Society, 26(2), pp.165~183 (2015)
- Cameron, Lynne J, "Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk", Discourse & Society, 18(2), pp.197~222 (2007)
- Caruso, Assunta, "A Roadmap to Peace: Journey Metaphors in Political Speeches on the Middle East Peace Process", Lingue e Linguaggi, 11, pp.77~92 (2014)
- Charteris-Black, Jonathan, "Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
- Chilton, Paul, "Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind", pp.15~43 (2005), John Benjamins
- Cruse, Alan, "Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics" (2004), Oxford University Press
- De Cillia, Rudolf, "The Discursive Construction of National Identities", Discourse & Society, 10(2), pp.149~173 (1999)
- Denton, JR., "The Rhetorical Functions of Slogans: Classifications and Characteristics", Communication Quarterly, 28(2), pp.10~18 (1980)
- Dochartaigh, Niall O, "Together in the Middle: Back-channel Negotiation in the Irish Peace Process", Journal of Peace Research, 48(6), pp.767~780 (2011)
- Dunmire, Patricia L, "Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse", Discourse & Society, 16(4), pp.481~514 (2005)
- Dunmire, Patricia L, "Rhetoric in Detail", pp.81~111 (2008), John Benjamins
- Dunmire, Patricia L, "Discourses of War and Peace", pp.23~46 (2013), Oxford University Press
- Fairclough, Norman, "Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research" (2003), Routledge
- Flowerdew, John, "Metaphors in the Discursive Construction of Patriotism: The Case of Hong Kong's Constitutional Reform Debate", Discourse & Society, 18(3), pp.273~294 (2007)
- Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia, "The Idiosyncratic Language of Israeli ‘Peace’: A Cultural Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CCDA)", Discourse & Society, 21(5), pp.565~585 (2010)
- Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia, "Talking Peace - Going to War’: Peace in the Service of the Israeli Just War Rhetoric", Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), pp.1~18 (2014)
- Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia, "Israeli Peace Discourse" (2015), John Benjamins
- Halliday, Michael, "Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective" (1985), Deakin University
- Halliday, M.A.K., "Writing Science" (1993), Falmer Press
- Halmari, Helena, "Persuasion across Genres", pp.105~134 (2005), John Benjamins
- Halmari, Helena, "Persuasion across Genres", pp.229~244 (2005), John Benjamins
- Hansson, Sten, "Calculated Overcommunication: Strategic Uses of Prolixity, Irrelevance, and Repetition in Administrative Language", Journal of Pragmatics, 84, pp.172~188 (2015)
- Hodges, Adam, "Discourses of War and Peace", pp.3~19 (2013), Oxford University Press
- Holt, Elizabeth, "Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), pp.219~245 (1996)
- Holt, Elizabeth, "Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), pp.425~454 (2000)
- Johnstone, Barbara, "An Introduction: Perspectives on Repetition", Text, 7(3), pp.205~214 (1987)
- Kamp, Zohar, "Too Good to be True: The Effects of Conciliatory Message Design on Compromising Attitudes in Intractable Conflicts", Discourse & Society, 30(3), pp.264~286 (2019)
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), Chicago University Press
- Latour, Bruno, "Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Linnel, Per, "Discourse across Boundaries: On Recontextualizations and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse", Text, 18(2), pp.143~157 (1998)
- Lu, Xing, "An Ideological", Cultural Analysis of Political Slogans in Communist China, 1999, pp.10(4), 487~508
- Mann, William C., "Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text", pp.39~78 (1992), John Benjamins
- Mann, William C., "Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization", Text, 8(3), pp.243~281 (1988)
- Marin-Arrese, Juana I, "Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition", pp.193~223 (2011), John Benjamins
- Miceli, Maria, "Emotional and Non-emotional Persuasion", Applied Artificial Intelligence, 20, pp.849~879 (2006)
- Mitchell, Christopher, "Gestures of Conciliation: Factors Contributing to Successful Olive Branches" (2000), Springer
- Ochs, Elinor, "Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12" (1979), Academic Press
- Pelclova, Jana, "Persuasion in Public Discourse", pp.1~17 (2018), John Benjamins
- Petty, Richard E., "Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change" (1986), Springer
- Pielenz, Michael, "Argumentation and Metaphor", Gunter Narr Verlag
- Plett, Heinrich F, "Intertextuality", pp.3~29 (1991), Walter de Gruyter
- Pommerantz, Anita, "Extreme Case Formulations: A New Way of Legitimating Claims", Human Studies, 9, pp.219~230 (1986)
- Reisigl, Martin, "Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism" (2001), Routledge
- Renkema, Jan, "Introduction to Discourse Studies" (2018), John Benjamins
- Santibanez, Cristian, "Metaphors and Argumentation: The Case of Chilean Parliament Media Participation", Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp.973~989 (2010)
- Shamir, Jacob, "Determinants of Reconciliation and Compromise among Israelis and Palestinians", Journal of Peace Research, 39(2), pp.185~202 (2002)
- Shankel, George E., "American Mottoes and Slogans" (1941), H. W. Wilson Company
- Song, Jianlin, "Slogans with Chinese Characteristics: The Political Functions of a Discourse Form", Discourse & Society, 31(2), pp.1~17 (2019)
- Swales, John, "Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Tannen, Deborah, "Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse" (1989), Cambridge University Press
- van Dijk, Teun A, "Discourse and Manipulation", Discourse & Society, 17(3), pp.359~383 (2006)
- van Leeuwen, Theo, "Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Virtanen, Tuija, "Persuasion across Genres", pp.3~24 (2005), John Benjamins
- Weiss, Josua N, "From Aristotle to Sadat: A Short Strategic Persuasion Framework for Negotiators", Negotiation Journal, pp.211~222 (2015)
- Yadgar, Yaacov, "A Myth of Peace: ‘The Vision of the New Middle East’ and its Transformations in the Israeli Political and Public Spheres", Journal of Peace Research, 43(3), pp.297~312 (2006)
- Yagcioglu, Semir A., "Logos or Mythos: (De)legitimation Strategies in Confrontational Discourses of Sociocultural Ethos", Discourse & Society, 12(6), pp.817~852 (2001)