일본 내각관방 영토・주권 대책기획조정실의 독도영유권 관련 ‘史料’ 분석과 그 성격
Analysis of historical materials related to the territorial sovereignty of Dokdo according to the Cabinet Secretariat of Japan and the character of this sovereignty
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The reason that Japan selected and disclosed the records collected by its Office of Policy Planning and Coordination on Territory and Sovereignty was to argue that their incorporation of Dokdo, an uninhabited island, was “lawful” based on “clear” grounds, and that their occupation of the island is “justified.” However, the documents used as proof have been intentionally manipulated and designed to support Japan’s argument. This study indicates how much of the disclosed records, in fact, disproves Japan’s right to occupy Dokdo. Just as Korean scholars are attending to research on Dokdo conducted by Japanese scholars, so Japanese scholars are interested in Korean research on the subject. This means that research by Korean scholars, as well as projects related to Dokdo conducted by the South Korean government and South Korean institutions, must be all the more rigorous. Additionally, we must conduct broad continuous and systematic research on Dokdo in order to promote correct understanding of the issue and its resolution, rather than simply responding to false claims made by Japan.
Abstract
The reason that Japan selected and disclosed the records collected by its Office of Policy Planning and Coordination on Territory and Sovereignty was to argue that their incorporation of Dokdo, an uninhabited island, was “lawful” based on “clear” grounds, and that their occupation of the island is “justified.” However, the documents used as proof have been intentionally manipulated and designed to support Japan’s argument. This study indicates how much of the disclosed records, in fact, disproves Japan’s right to occupy Dokdo. Just as Korean scholars are attending to research on Dokdo conducted by Japanese scholars, so Japanese scholars are interested in Korean research on the subject. This means that research by Korean scholars, as well as projects related to Dokdo conducted by the South Korean government and South Korean institutions, must be all the more rigorous. Additionally, we must conduct broad continuous and systematic research on Dokdo in order to promote correct understanding of the issue and its resolution, rather than simply responding to false claims made by Japan.
참고문헌 (16)
- 곽진오, "『죽도문제 100문 100답』을 통해서 본 일본의 독도영유권 주장과 한계", 독도연구, 16 (2014)
- 김병렬, "『죽도문제 100문 100답』에 대한 비판적 검토, 그리고 우리의 대응", 영토해양연구, 7 (2014)
- 송휘영, "『죽도문제 100문 100답』의 죽도도해금지와 태정관지령 비판, 일본의 고유영토론은 성립하는가", 독도연구, 16 (2014)
- 윤소영, "일본 메이지시대 문헌에 나타난 울릉도와 독도 인식", 독도연구, 1 (2005)
- 이우진, "『학습지도요령 및 해설』을 통해 본 일본의 영토교육 -「개정 교육법」부터 「2018 고교 학습지도요령」까지-", 독도연구, (24), pp.295~324 (2018), 독도연구소[DOI]
- 이태우, "1905년 ‘독도편입’ 전후 일본 사료에 나타난 울릉도⋅독도의 지리적 인식", 독도연구, (26), pp.161~188 (2019), 독도연구소[DOI]
- 정영미, "일본의 독도 영유권 근거 자료 조사 정리의 역사적 경과와 의미", 영토해양연구, 11 (2016)
- 최보영, "개항기(1902~1906) 일본영사관경찰의 울릉도주재소 설치와 한국의 대응", 한국근현대사연구, (86), pp.97~122 (2018), 한국근현대사학회[DOI]
- 최보영, "일본 內閣官房 領土・主權 對策企劃調整室의 ‘독도에 관한 자료조사보고서’ 간행과 공개자료의 의미", 사학연구, (134), pp.165~204 (2019), 한국사학회[DOI]
- 최장근, "일본의 고지도･고문헌상의 「우산도=석도=독도」 부정에 대한 비판-‘죽도문제연구회’의 '100문 100답'을 중심으로-", 日本文化學報, (62), pp.309~329 (2014), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
- 최철영, "「대한제국 칙령 제41호」의 법제사적 의미검토 -1900년 대한제국 칙령 제41호와 1905년 일본 각의결정의 비교검토-", 독도연구, (19), pp.109~140 (2015), 독도연구소
- 한철호, "일본 수로부의 「조선전안」 간행‧개정 및 활용과 독도 인식", 한국사연구, (169), pp.235~267 (2015), 한국사연구회
- 池内敏, "竹島問題とは何か" (2012), 名古屋大学出版会
- 池内敏, "海圖水路誌竹島問題", 名古屋大學附屬圖書館硏究年報, 12 (2015)
- "山陰中央新報", ~
- "産經新聞", ~