본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한일 독도 영유권과 어업문제 연구: 샌프란시스코 강화조약 전후시기를 중심으로

A Study of Korea-Japan Dokdo Sovereignty and Fisheries Issues:Focusing on the Period Before and After the San Francisco Peace Treaty

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The confrontation between Korea and Japan over Dokdo Island's sovereignty continues to this day. However, it has been over 70 years since the liberation from Japan to reclaim the stolen territory. It also raises questions about the basis for Japan to claim Dokdo Island as their territory. One of the reasons is that Dokdo Island was not contained in the territory of Korea that Japan should give up in the contents of the San Francisco Peace Treaty. And this is the basis that Japan keep claiming Dokdo Island’s sovereignty. Meanwhile, Japan's expansion of fishing zones immediately after the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty was a major threat to Korean fishing workers. Naturally, the Korean government tried to come up with a countermeasure. This was directly related to Dokdo Island's territorial sovereignty, accelerating friction with Japan. If so, there is a natural interest in how Korea and Japan’s Dokdo Island dispute and the fisheries issues are connected to each other. And also it is necessary to find out how did Korean government resist against expansion of Japanese fishing territory after the San Francisco Peace Treaty. Therefore, this research is focusing on the period before and after the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which signed in September 1951, to find out how the international recognition of Korea's sovereignty over Dokdo Island is frustrated and what was the countermeasure of Korean government against Japan’s illegal fishing on the Korean Peninsula. In order to progress this research subject, the researcher will use related book, thesis and internet material.

Abstract

The confrontation between Korea and Japan over Dokdo Island's sovereignty continues to this day. However, it has been over 70 years since the liberation from Japan to reclaim the stolen territory. It also raises questions about the basis for Japan to claim Dokdo Island as their territory. One of the reasons is that Dokdo Island was not contained in the territory of Korea that Japan should give up in the contents of the San Francisco Peace Treaty. And this is the basis that Japan keep claiming Dokdo Island’s sovereignty. Meanwhile, Japan's expansion of fishing zones immediately after the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty was a major threat to Korean fishing workers. Naturally, the Korean government tried to come up with a countermeasure. This was directly related to Dokdo Island's territorial sovereignty, accelerating friction with Japan. If so, there is a natural interest in how Korea and Japan’s Dokdo Island dispute and the fisheries issues are connected to each other. And also it is necessary to find out how did Korean government resist against expansion of Japanese fishing territory after the San Francisco Peace Treaty. Therefore, this research is focusing on the period before and after the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which signed in September 1951, to find out how the international recognition of Korea's sovereignty over Dokdo Island is frustrated and what was the countermeasure of Korean government against Japan’s illegal fishing on the Korean Peninsula. In order to progress this research subject, the researcher will use related book, thesis and internet material.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 국민대학교 일본학연구소, "GHQ시대 한일관계의 재조명" (2016), 선인
  2. 김동조, "회상30년 한일회담" (1986), 중앙일보사
  3. 김병렬, "독도 관련 문제 연구를 위한 일제언", 영토해양연구, 11 (2016), 동북아역사재단
  4. 김영석, "1948년 UN총회 결의 195(III)호와 우리나라의 독도에 대한 영유권", 법학논집, 19(2), pp.483~503 (2014), 법학연구소
  5. 김용주, "나의 회고록 풍설시대 80년" (1984), 신기원사
  6. 박경래, "독도" (1965), 대한공론사
  7. 박진희, "한일회담" (2008), 선인
  8. 신용옥, "‘평화선’ 획정 과정의 논리 전개와 그 성격", 史叢(사총), (76), pp.97~142 (2012), 역사연구소[DOI]
  9. 윤석정, "관대한 대일강화조약과 이승만 정권의 강화조약외교 - 일본의 군사적 주권 문제와 이를 둘러싼 한미 간의 마찰", 동북아역사논총, (63), pp.367~396 (2019), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
  10. 이원덕, "한일 과거사 처리의 원점" (1996), 서울대학교출판부
  11. 정병준, "독도1947: 전후 독도문제와 한․미․일 관계" (2010), 돌베개
  12. 조윤수, "해양을 둘러싼 한일관계 50년: 1952년 해양주권 선언 ‘평화선’ 선언에서 현재까지", 독도연구저널, 31 (2015), 한국해양수산개발원
  13. 지철근, "평화선" (1979), 범우사
  14. 지철근, "한일어업분쟁사" (1989), 한국수산신보사
  15. 지철근, "시련기의 수산업사" (1998), 한국수산신보사
  16. 최영호, "한국과의 어업협정 교섭을 위한 1952년 일본 측 기본방침에 관한 연구", 동북아역사논총, (50), pp.159~200 (2015), 동북아역사재단
  17. 한일회담자료, "등록번호 : 83, 분류번호 : 723.1JA 선1951-52 1-36차", 정무과, ~ (1952)
  18. 한일회담자료, "등록번호 : 3111, 분류번호 : 723.1JA 법1951-52 1-36차", 정무과, ~ (1952)
  19. United States Department of States, "Foreign Relations of the United States, Asia and the Pacific, Volume VI, Part 1", United States Government Printing Office, ~ (1951)
  20. 伊藤祐子, "日米安保体制の50年-日米安全保障政策と日本の安全保障観の変容", 亜細亜大学国際関係紀要, 11(1) (2001), 亜細亜大学国際関係研究所
  21. 小野寺五典, "日米漁業摩擦の起源とその背景 : いわゆる‘プリストル湾事件’に関する素描と一考察", 北大水産業報, 47(1) (1996), 北海道大學水産學部
  22. 川上健三, "戦後の国際漁業制度" (1972), 大日本水産会
  23. 水産新聞協会, "大日本水産会百年史(後編)" (1982), 大日本水産会
  24. 第3期竹島問題に関する調査研究最終報告書, "第3期竹島問題研究会", 島根県総務部総務課, ~ (2015)
  25. 中村麗衣, "日印平和条約とインド外交", 史論, 56 (2003), 東京女子大学学会史学研究室
  26. 日韓漁業協議会, "日韓漁業対策運動史" (1968), 内外水産研究所
  27. 日本海洋漁業協議会, "日米加漁業条約の解説" (1952), 内外水産研究所
  28. 毎日新聞社, "岩波書店と文藝春秋" (1996), 毎日新聞社
  29. 山内康英, "歴史としての日韓国交正常化:脫植民地化編" (2011), 法政大学出版局
  30. ロー․ダニエル, "竹島密約" (2013), 草思社文庫

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)