본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Advice in Institution Discourse: International Briefings

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study investigates advice exchanges in international briefings where a spokesperson and the press interact. International briefings where a spokesperson and the press interact were used as the data and yielded the corpus containing 50,730 words. Instances of advice were collected in the question and answer section of the briefings in which advice-seeking questions are likely to be met by advice-giving answers. The findings showed similarities and differences from interpersonal advice. Advice in institutional briefings was realized as three common categories based on direct, hedged, and indirect form exhibiting diverse lexical and grammatical devices. The findings showed that linguistic features of institutional advice differed from those of interpersonal advice. Advice in the form of questions was rarely used in formal advice; instead, grammatical devices like imperatives, modal verbs, and performative items were employed. Among the various question and answer exchanges, advice exchanges were common, exhibiting the functions of advice in response to challenging questions and closing exchanges in a positive manner. Implications of the empirical findings were also discussed in relation with speech act theory and methodology.

Abstract

This study investigates advice exchanges in international briefings where a spokesperson and the press interact. International briefings where a spokesperson and the press interact were used as the data and yielded the corpus containing 50,730 words. Instances of advice were collected in the question and answer section of the briefings in which advice-seeking questions are likely to be met by advice-giving answers. The findings showed similarities and differences from interpersonal advice. Advice in institutional briefings was realized as three common categories based on direct, hedged, and indirect form exhibiting diverse lexical and grammatical devices. The findings showed that linguistic features of institutional advice differed from those of interpersonal advice. Advice in the form of questions was rarely used in formal advice; instead, grammatical devices like imperatives, modal verbs, and performative items were employed. Among the various question and answer exchanges, advice exchanges were common, exhibiting the functions of advice in response to challenging questions and closing exchanges in a positive manner. Implications of the empirical findings were also discussed in relation with speech act theory and methodology.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Austin, J. L., "How to Do Things with Words" (1962), Clarendon Press
  2. Brown, P., "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  3. 전문영, "Cross-Cultural Variation in the Linguistic Politeness of Advice-Giving Speech Acts", 현대영어교육, 11(2), pp.235~253 (2010), 현대영어교육학회
  4. DeCapua, A., "‘If I were you. . . ’ : Advice in American English", Multilingua, 14(2), pp.117~132 (1995)
  5. de Candia, S., "'I Don't Know the Answer to that Question' : A Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis of White House Press Briefings", Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 7(1), pp.66~81 (2013)
  6. Fraser, B., "Hedging in Political Discourse: The 2007 Bush Press Conference", Papers from the 2nd International Conference on Political Discourse, pp.201~213 (2009)
  7. Freed, A. F., "The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction", pp.1~18 (2015)
  8. Heritage, J., "Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings", pp.359~417 (1992), Cambridge University Press
  9. Hinkel, E., "Appropriateness of Advice : DCT and Multiple Choice Data1", Applied Linguistics, 18(1), pp.1~26 (1997)
  10. Hosni, H. R., "Advice Giving in Egyptian Arabic and American English : A Cross-linguistic, Cross-cultural Study", Journal of Pragmatics, 155, pp.193~212 (2020)
  11. Jenkins, J., "English as a Lingua Franca : Interpretations and Attitudes", World Englishes, 28(2), pp.200~207 (2009)
  12. Kecskes, I., "Why Do We Say What We Say the Way We Say It?", Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1), pp.71~83 (2013)
  13. LoCastro, V, "Learner subjectivity and pragmatic competence", Language Teaching Research, 1(3), pp.239~267 (1997)
  14. Locher, M. A., "Health Internet Sites : A Linguistic Perspective on Health Advice Columns", Social Semiotics, 20(1), pp.43~59 (2010)
  15. Limberg, H., "Advice in Discourse", pp.1~27 (2012), John Benjamins
  16. Martineze-Flor, A., "Non-native Speakers' Production of Advice Acts: The Effects of Proficiency", Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 16, pp.139~153 (2003)
  17. 민수정, "The Speech Act of Offering Advice in Learner English in Korean Context", 언어과학, 25(4), pp.201~219 (2018), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  18. Partington, A., "Teasing at the White House : A Corpus-assisted Study of Face Work in Performing and Responding to Teases", Text & Talk, 28(6), pp.771~792 (2008)
  19. Phillipson, R., "Language Policy and Education in the European Union", Language Policy and Political Issues in Education, 1, pp.255~265 (2008)
  20. Searle, J. R., "A Classification of Illocutionary Acts", Language in Society, 5(1), pp.1~23 (1976)
  21. Tracy, K., "Questions, Questioning, and Institutional Practices : an Introduction", Discourse Studies, 11(2), pp.131~152 (2009)
  22. Van Poppel, L., "Anticipating Resistance to Health advice : A Speech Act Perspective", Discourse Processes, 56(3), pp.256~269 (2019)
  23. Vehviläinen, S., "Advice in Discourse", pp.31~52 (2012), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)