Cross-Cultural Variation in the Linguistic Politeness of Advice-Giving Speech Acts
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
This study aims to investigate cross-cultural differences in the speech act of advice between Canadian English speakers (CESs) and Korean speakers (KSs) and to provide interpretations of the differences not only in terms of individualism and collectivism but also horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Thirty-five CESs and thirty-five KSs participated in this study. The questionnaire used in this research consisted of eight different situations in which participants were asked to choose one of the four strategies of advice: bald-on-record (BOR), on-record with redress (ORR), off record (OFF), and not doing face-threatening acts (NOT) strategies. Results indicate that in the impact of social distance, relative power, and the seriousness of advice on politeness strategies, there was in general a significant difference between CESs and KSs, and that the concept of politeness in Korean culture should be interpreted very differently from that in Canadian culture. The results of this study imply that the sociopragmatic conventions of advice-giving speech acts in English-speaking cultures should constitute an integral part of the EFL curriculum in order to facilitate intercultural communications.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate cross-cultural differences in the speech act of advice between Canadian English speakers (CESs) and Korean speakers (KSs) and to provide interpretations of the differences not only in terms of individualism and collectivism but also horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Thirty-five CESs and thirty-five KSs participated in this study. The questionnaire used in this research consisted of eight different situations in which participants were asked to choose one of the four strategies of advice: bald-on-record (BOR), on-record with redress (ORR), off record (OFF), and not doing face-threatening acts (NOT) strategies. Results indicate that in the impact of social distance, relative power, and the seriousness of advice on politeness strategies, there was in general a significant difference between CESs and KSs, and that the concept of politeness in Korean culture should be interpreted very differently from that in Canadian culture. The results of this study imply that the sociopragmatic conventions of advice-giving speech acts in English-speaking cultures should constitute an integral part of the EFL curriculum in order to facilitate intercultural communications.
참고문헌 (32)
- 안옥모, "Analyzing Complaint Letters", 현대영어교육, 10(3), pp.1~16 (2009), 현대영어교육학회
- Austin, J. L., "How to do things with words" (1962), Oxford University Press
- Bae, Daekweon, "A pragmatic analysis of cross-cultural perspective and the implications for Korean EFL class", Modern English Education, 7(2), pp.3~18 (2006)
- Beebe, L., "Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. in : Developing communicative competence in a second language", pp.55~73 (1990), Newbury House
- Bergman, M., "Perception and performance in native and non-native apology. in : Interlanguage pragmatics", pp.82~107 (1993), Oxford University Press
- Blum-Kulka, S., "The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society. in : Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice", pp.255~280 (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
- Blum-Kulka, S., "Cross-cultural pragmatics Requests and apologies" (1989), Ablex
- Blum-Kulka, S., "Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP)", Applied Linguistics, 5(3), pp.196~213 (1984)
- Brown, P., "Politeness: Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Chun, Moon-Young, "Cultural relativity and universality of linguistic politeness: The speech act of advice", 박사, pp.2009
- Eisenstein, M., "Expressing gratitude in American English. in : Interlanguage pragmatics", pp.64~81 (1993), Oxford University Press
- Fukada, A., "Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics", Journal of Pragmatics, 36(11), pp.1991~2002 (2004)
- Garcia, C., "Apologizing in English: Politeness strategies used by native and nonnative speakers", Multilingua, 8(1), pp.3~20 (1989)
- Gu, Y., "Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese", Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp.237~257 (1990)
- Hill, B., "Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English", Journal of Pragmatics, 10, pp.347~371 (1986)
- Hinkel, E., "Appropriateness of advice as L2 solidarity strategy", RELC Journal, 25(2), pp.71~93 (1994)
- Ide, S., "Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness", Multilingua, 8, pp.223~248 (1989)
- Ide, S., "Preface: The search for integrated universals of linguistic politeness", Multilingua, 12, pp.7~11 (1993)
- Kasper, G., "Linguistic politeness: Current research issues", Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp.193~218 (1990)
- 김덕영, "A Study of Complaint Strategies for EFL College Learners", 현대영어교육, 9(2), pp.58~70 (2008), 현대영어교육학회
- Leech, G. N., "Principles of pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Matsumoto, Y., "Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese", Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), pp.451~486 (1988)
- Nwoye, O. G., "Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face", Journal of Pragmatics, 18, pp.309~328 (1992)
- Olshtain, E., "Apologies across languages. in : Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies", pp.55~173 (1989), Ablex
- Shavitt, S., "The horizontal", vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research, 2006, pp.16(4), 325~356
- Singelis, T. M., "Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement", Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), pp.240~275 (1995)
- Sohn, Ho-min, "Linguistic expeditions" (1986), Hanshin
- Takahashi, T., "Cross-linguistic influence in the speech act of correction. in : Interlanguage pragmatics", pp.82~107 (1993), Oxford University Press
- Triandis, H. C., "Individualism and collectivism" (1995), Westview Press
- Trosborg, A., "Apology strategies in native", non-native speakers of English, 1987, pp.11(1), 147~167
- Wierzbicka, A., "Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish and English", Journal of Pragmatics, 9, pp.145~178 (1985)
- Wierzbicka, A., "Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction" (1991), Mouton de Gruyer