만주어 직시 이동 동사의 특성
Some characteristics of deictic motion verbs in written Manchu
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Manchu, the deictic center includes not only the position of the speaker but also the position of the listener or of a third person who is the central character of the story. In events involving a speaker, rarely, the speaker's position is not the deictic center. However, in such a case, this is due to pragmatic selection considering the listener, not the restriction on the speaker position of the coding time or reference time. The verbs jimbi 'to come' and genembi 'to go', which are the deictic motion verbs in Manchu, are opposed in the deicticity based on the deictic center. And yabumbi 'go' is a neutral motion verb. Also, yabumbi implies that the figure is plural in the imperative form. The verb genembi is source-oriented, but jimbi is not goal-oriented. In Manchu, there is a situation where s/he went but did not leave and s/he came but did not arrive. However, these two situations are not based on the same principle. The situation where s/he went but did not leave is not because of genembi's lexical-semantic, but because of the aspectual function of the past marker -ha, which expresses a predetermined future. On the other hand, when she came but did not arrive, it is because the verb jimbi does not imply resultative, and in other words, it is not goal-oriented.
Abstract
In Manchu, the deictic center includes not only the position of the speaker but also the position of the listener or of a third person who is the central character of the story. In events involving a speaker, rarely, the speaker's position is not the deictic center. However, in such a case, this is due to pragmatic selection considering the listener, not the restriction on the speaker position of the coding time or reference time. The verbs jimbi 'to come' and genembi 'to go', which are the deictic motion verbs in Manchu, are opposed in the deicticity based on the deictic center. And yabumbi 'go' is a neutral motion verb. Also, yabumbi implies that the figure is plural in the imperative form. The verb genembi is source-oriented, but jimbi is not goal-oriented. In Manchu, there is a situation where s/he went but did not leave and s/he came but did not arrive. However, these two situations are not based on the same principle. The situation where s/he went but did not leave is not because of genembi's lexical-semantic, but because of the aspectual function of the past marker -ha, which expresses a predetermined future. On the other hand, when she came but did not arrive, it is because the verb jimbi does not imply resultative, and in other words, it is not goal-oriented.
참고문헌 (16)
- 이남석, "이동의 움직씨에 관한 지시적 해석", 한국어학, 9, pp.229~257 (1999), 한국어학회
- 주보현, "영어 이동동사 come과 go의 유표성 양상에 관한 연구", 언어연구, 28(2), pp.355~371 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 최계영, "한국어와 만주어의 직시 결합 동사 구문에 대한 대조 연구", 알타이학보, (30), pp.55~80 (2020), 한국알타이학회[DOI]
- 早田輝洋, "視点移動のない｢行く｣と｢来る｣", UP, 361, pp.29~33 (2002), 東京大学出版会
- Clark, Eve V., "Is He Coming or Going? On the Acquisition of Deictic Verbs", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, pp.559~572 (1974)
- Di Comso, "The Diary of a Manchu soldier in seventeenth-century China" (2006), Routledge
- Fillmore, Charles J., "Coming and going, Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis 1971" (1975), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Goddard, Cliff, "The Semantics of Coming and Going", Pragmatics, 7(2), pp.147~162 (1997)
- Gorelova, Liliya M., "Manchu Grammar" (2002), Brill
- Josephs, Lewis S., "Palauan Reference Grammar" (2019), University of Hawaii Press
- Kuno, Susumu, "Empathy and Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 8(4), pp.627~672 (1977)
- Lyons, John, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Miller, George A., "Language and Perception" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Nakazawa, Tsuneko, "A typology of the Ground of deictic motion verbs as Path-conflating verbs : The speaker, the addressee, and beyond", Poznań Studies in contemporary linguistics, 43(2), pp.59~82 (2007)
- Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics : Typology and Process in Concept Structuring" (2000), MIT Press
- Wilkins, David P., "When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs", Cognitive Linguistics, 6(2, pp.3) (1995), 209~259