본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임플란트 healing abutment 높이와 타진각도에 따른 타진방식 임플란트 안정성 측정기기의 수치 차이

Differences in percussion-type measurements of implant stability according to height of healing abutments and measurement angle

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

목적: 인조골에 동일한 조건으로 식립한 임플란트에 대하여 타진방식의 임플란트 안정성 측정기기인 Periotest와 AnyCheck을 사용하여 안정성 수치를 측정함에 있어서, healing abutment의 높이와 타진각도의 변화에 따른 각 측정기기의 안정성 수치 차이를 조사하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 총 60개의 임플란트를 주문제작한 인조골 블록에 식립하고 2, 3, 4, 5 mm 높이의 healing abutment를 각각 15개씩 네 그룹으로 나누어 체결하였으며, 각각 식립 토크, implant stability test, Periotest value를 측정했다. 임플란트 식립 시 45 - 55 Ncm의 토크를 유지하였다. 임플란트 장축에 수직인 지면을 기준으로, implant stability test는 AnyCheck을 사용하여 0°, 30°의 기울기로 측정했으며 Periotest value는 Periotest M을 사용하여 0°, 30°의 기울기로 측정하였다. 측정값은 통계적으로 비교 분석하였다. 결과: 식립 토크는 그룹 간 통계적 유의차가 없었다. AnyCheck과 Periotest M으로 측정했을 때, healing abutment의 높이가 증가할수록 안정성 수치가 낮게 측정되었다. 또한 AnyCheck과 Periotest M을 0°와 30° 기울기로 측정 시 0°로 측정한 그룹에서 안정성 수치가 더 낮게 측정되었다. 결론: 임플란트의 안정성 수치를 타진방식으로 측정할 때에는 healing abutment 높이와 타진각도의 변화에 따른 차이를 고려하여 측정해야 표준화된 평가를 할 수 있으며, 이에 대한 더욱 세밀한 사용법을 인지할 필요가 있다고 사료되었다.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of healing abutment height and measurement angle on implant stability when using Periotest and AnyCheck. Materials and methods: 60 implants were placed into artificial bone blocks. After implant insertion, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm healing abutments were installed on 15 specimens, respectively. Insertion torque value, implant stability test, Periotest value were measured. Insertion torque value was controlled between 45 - 55 Ncm. AnyCheck was used for measuring implant stability test and Periotest M was used for measuring Periotest value. Implant stability test and Periotest value were measured at the angles of 0 and 30 degrees to the horizontal plane. Measured values were analyzed statistically. Results: Insertion torque value had no significant difference among groups. When healing abutment height was higher, implant stability test and Periotest value showed lower stability. Also when measurement angle was decreased, implant stability test and Periotest value showed lower stability. Conclusion: When measuring stability of implants with percussion type devices, measured values should be evaluated considering height of healing abutments and measurement angle.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Raghavendra S, "Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.425~431 (2005)
  2. Meredith N, "Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.491~501 (1998)
  3. Javed F, "The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review", J Dent, 38, pp.612~620 (2010)[DOI]
  4. Elias CN, "Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 16, pp.169~180 (2012)[DOI]
  5. O'Sullivan D, "Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2, pp.85~92 (2000)[DOI]
  6. Ericsson I, "A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 5, pp.202~206 (1994)[DOI]
  7. Johansson CB, "A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.437~441 (1991)
  8. Wennerberg A, "A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies", Clin Oral Implants Res, 6, pp.24~30 (1995)[DOI]
  9. Swami V, "Current trends to measure implant stability", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 16, pp.124~130 (2016)[DOI]
  10. Huang HM, "Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.437~443 (2003)[DOI]
  11. Sennerby L, "Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications", Periodontol 2000, 47, pp.51~66 (2008)[DOI]
  12. Oh JS, "Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 113, pp.e35~e40 (2012)
  13. Atsumi M, "Methods used to assess implant stability: current status", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.743~754 (2007)
  14. Faulkner MG, "The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant", abutment systems, 2001, pp.16, 486~494
  15. Faulkner MG, "Measuring abutment", implant joint integrity with the Periotest instrument, 1999, pp.14, 681~688
  16. Aparicio C, "The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report", Int J Periodontic Restor Dent, 17, pp.150~161 (1997)
  17. Aparicio C, "Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant", bone interface, 2006, pp.17, 2~7
  18. Teerlinck J, "Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.55~61 (1991)
  19. Devlin H, "A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.323~327 (1998)[DOI]
  20. Choi HH, "Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor", Implant Dent, 23, pp.51~56 (2014)[DOI]
  21. Olive J, "Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.390~400 (1990)
  22. Kim SJ, "Periotest assessment of dental implant mobility: a clinical study", J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 36, pp.758~771 (1998)
  23. Herrmann I, "Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.220~230 (2005)
  24. Jaffin RA, "The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis", J Periodontol, 62, pp.2~4 (1991)[DOI]
  25. Friberg B, "Clinical outcome of Branemark System implants of various diameters: a retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.671~677 (2002)
  26. Jun SH, "Comparison of initial stability parameters and histomorphometric analysis of implants inserted into extraction sockets: human fresh cadaver study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.985~990 (2010)
  27. Levin BP, "The correlation between immediate implant insertion torque and implant stability quotient", Int J Periodontic Restor Dent, 36, pp.833~840 (2016)[DOI]
  28. Gomez-Roman G, "Influence of the implant abutment on the Periotest value: an in vivo study", Quintessence Int, 32, pp.797~799 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

상부 보철물에 따른 타진식 임플란트 안정성 측정기기의 수치 변화강선우, 권연우, 김복주, 김정한, 김철훈, 성현미, 옥성미, 황희성대한통합치과학회 · 대한통합치과학회지2021 · 제10권 제1호The reliability of Anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter박진홍, 신상완, 신요한, 심지석, 이동훈, 이정열대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제2호브릿지 형태의 상부보철물 및 상부보철물의 나사풀림에 따른 타진식 임플란트 안정성 측정기기의 수치비교강선우, 권연우, 김복주, 김정한, 김철훈, 성현미대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2022 · 제61권 제1호임플란트 안정성 평가를 위한 타진 기기의 측정 각도에 따른 반복성 분석: 생체외 연구강대영, 권용환, 안형성, 이성조, 조인우대한통합치과학회 · 대한통합치과학회지2025 · 제14권 제2호Effects of Striking and Bone Conditions on Damping Capacity Assessment: An in vitro Study강대영, 신현승, 안현성, 조인우대한구강악안면임플란트학회 · 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지2023 · 제27권 제2호Reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on various clinical conditions: an in vitro study김명섭, 류재준, 심지석, 이정열, 이한나, Xu Zihan대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2023 · 제15권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)