상부 보철물에 따른 타진식 임플란트 안정성 측정기기의 수치 변화
Study of the Differences in a Percussion-type Implant Stability Measuring Instrument according to Type of Prosthesis
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we used the AnyCheck device to determine the effect on the implant stability test (IST) of different prostheses. The purpose of this study was to safely measure the stability of the implant and to determine whether the IST can be used even after the prosthesis cementation. Fifteen implants were placed on the artificial bone block. Prostheses were classified into five groups: healing abutment, ready-made abutment, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), monolithic zirconia, and PFM. For PMMA, monolithic zirconia and PFM were produced using the same design within the computed-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing system. Results of the analysis, showed that, in all groups, IST had significant reliability, and a difference was noted based on the type of prosthesis. There was no significant difference in IST between the ready-made abutment and the healing abutment, but the average IST decreased in PMMA, and the average IST increased in monolithic zirconia and PFM. Each group’s IST showed a consistent tendency according to the type of prosthesis. Thus, the IST can be used for the evaluation of implant stability, even after prosthesis cementation, as well as for the determination of the timing of implant loading. Because the change in IST was correlated with the hardness and elastic modulus of each type of prosthesis, additional research on the physical properties of each material is required.
Abstract
In this study, we used the AnyCheck device to determine the effect on the implant stability test (IST) of different prostheses. The purpose of this study was to safely measure the stability of the implant and to determine whether the IST can be used even after the prosthesis cementation. Fifteen implants were placed on the artificial bone block. Prostheses were classified into five groups: healing abutment, ready-made abutment, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), monolithic zirconia, and PFM. For PMMA, monolithic zirconia and PFM were produced using the same design within the computed-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing system. Results of the analysis, showed that, in all groups, IST had significant reliability, and a difference was noted based on the type of prosthesis. There was no significant difference in IST between the ready-made abutment and the healing abutment, but the average IST decreased in PMMA, and the average IST increased in monolithic zirconia and PFM. Each group’s IST showed a consistent tendency according to the type of prosthesis. Thus, the IST can be used for the evaluation of implant stability, even after prosthesis cementation, as well as for the determination of the timing of implant loading. Because the change in IST was correlated with the hardness and elastic modulus of each type of prosthesis, additional research on the physical properties of each material is required.
참고문헌 (28)
- Brånemark PI, "Lindström J, Hallén O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 16(Suppl), pp.1~132 (1977)
- MISCH, "Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive boen loading", Int J Oral Implantol, 6, pp.23~31 (1990)
- Ericsson I, "Early functional loading of Brånemark dental implants : 5-year clinical follow-up study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2, pp.70~77 (2000)
- Avila G, "Immediate implant loading : current status from available literature", Implant Dent, 16, pp.235~245 (2007)
- Esposito M, "The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants : a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.893~904 (2007)
- Morton D, "Group 2 ITI consensus report : prosthodontics and implant dentistry", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.215~223 (2018)
- Atsumi M, "Methods used to assess implant stability : current status", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.743~754 (2007)
- 식품의약품안전처, "치과용 임플란트의 조직반응 평가기법에관한 가이드라인", ~ (2015)
- Sewerin IP, "Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of peri-implant radiolucencies-an in vitro experiment", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.299~304 (1997)
- Molly L, "Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(S2), pp.124~135 (2006)
- Aparicio C, "Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant", bone interface, 2006, pp.17(S2), 2~7
- Lukas D, "Periotest-a dynamic procedure for the diagnosis of the human periodontium", Clin Phys Physiol Meas, 11, pp.65~75 (1990)
- Olivé J, "The periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.390~400 (1990)
- Aparicio C, "Use of 5-mm-diameter implants : Periotest®values related to a clinical and radiographic evaluation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 9, pp.398~406 (1998)
- Weber HP, "A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.144~153 (2000)
- 박양훈, "임플란트 healing abutment 높이와 타진각도에 따른 타진방식 임플란트 안정성 측정기기의 수치 차이", 대한치과보철학회지, 56(4), pp.278~286 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Vojdani M, "Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD", CAM and conventional wax up techniques, 2013, pp.14, 118~129
- Abduo J, "Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses : a critical review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.506~515 (2010)
- Kale E, "Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.890~895 (2016)
- 김동연, "치과 CAD", CAM 시스템으로 제작한 코발트-크롬 소결 금속 코핑의 변연 및 내면 적합도 평가, 2015, pp.15(5), 536~541[DOI]
- Elias CN, "Mechanical and clinical properties of titanium and titanium-based alloys (Ti G2, Ti G4 cold worked nanostructured and Ti G5) for biomedical applications", J Mater Res Technol, 8, pp.1060~1069 (2019)
- Ho GW, "Insights on ceramics as dental materials. Part I: ceramic material types in dentistry", Silicon, 3, pp.109~115 (2011)
- Candido LM, "Mechanical and surface properties of monolithic zirconia", Oper Dent, 43, pp.E119~28 (2018)
- Chavez H, "Assessment of oral implant mobility", J Prosthet Dent, 70, pp.421~426 (1993)
- Meredith N, "Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.261~267 (1996)
- Meredith N, "Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in viva. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.226~233 (1997)
- Truhlar RS, "Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants", Ann Periodontol, 5, pp.42~55 (2000)
- Choi HH, "Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss : an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor", Implant Dent, 23, pp.51~56 (2014)