The reliability of Anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the reliability of the Anycheck device and the effect of the healing abutment diameter on the Anycheck values (implant stability test, IST). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty implants were placed into three artificial bone blocks with 10 Ncm, 15 Ncm, and 35 Ncm insertion torque value (ITV), respectively (n = 10). (1) The implant stability was measured with three different kinds of devices (Periotest M, Osstell ISQ Mentor, and Anycheck). (2) Five different diameters (4.0, 4.5, 4.8, 5.5, and 6.0 mm) of healing abutments of the same height were connected to the implants and the implant stability was measured four times in different directions with Anycheck. The measured mean values were statistically analyzed. RESULTS. The correlation coefficient between the mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) and IST value was 0.981 (P<.01) and the correlation coefficient between the meant periotest value (PTV) and IST value was -0.931 (P<.01). There were no statistically significant differences among the IST values with different healing abutment diameters. CONCLUSION. There was a strong correlation between the Periotest M and Anycheck values and between the ISQ and IST. The diameter of the healing abutment had no effect on the Anycheck values.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the reliability of the Anycheck device and the effect of the healing abutment diameter on the Anycheck values (implant stability test, IST). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty implants were placed into three artificial bone blocks with 10 Ncm, 15 Ncm, and 35 Ncm insertion torque value (ITV), respectively (n = 10). (1) The implant stability was measured with three different kinds of devices (Periotest M, Osstell ISQ Mentor, and Anycheck). (2) Five different diameters (4.0, 4.5, 4.8, 5.5, and 6.0 mm) of healing abutments of the same height were connected to the implants and the implant stability was measured four times in different directions with Anycheck. The measured mean values were statistically analyzed. RESULTS. The correlation coefficient between the mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) and IST value was 0.981 (P<.01) and the correlation coefficient between the meant periotest value (PTV) and IST value was -0.931 (P<.01). There were no statistically significant differences among the IST values with different healing abutment diameters. CONCLUSION. There was a strong correlation between the Periotest M and Anycheck values and between the ISQ and IST. The diameter of the healing abutment had no effect on the Anycheck values.
참고문헌 (29)
- Atsumi M, "Methods used to assess implant stability : current status", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.743~754 (2007)
- Meredith N, "Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.491~501 (1998)
- Sennerby L, "Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants : a review of the literature", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.408~420 (1998)
- Sennerby L, "Implant stability measurements us-ing resonance frequency analysis : biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications", Periodontol 2000, 47, pp.51~66 (2008)
- Ostman PO, "Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery", Int J Prosthodont, 19, pp.77~83 (2006)
- Hayashi M, "A no-contact vibration device for measuring implant stability", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.931~936 (2010)
- Feng SW, "Damping factor as a diagnostic parameter for assessment of osseointegration during the dental implant healing process : An experimental study in rabbits", Ann Biomed Eng, 44, pp.3668~3678 (2016)
- Alsaadi G, "A biomechanical assessment of the relation between the oral implant stability at insertion and subjective bone quality assessment", J Clin Periodontol, 34, pp.359~366 (2007)
- Winkler S, "Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function", J Oral Implantol, 27, pp.198~203 (2001)
- Truhlar RS, "Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants", Ann Periodontol, 5, pp.42~55 (2000)
- Pang KM, "Clinical outcomes of magnesium-incorporated oxidised implants : a randomised double-blind clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.616~621 (2014)
- Oh JS, "A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability : Periotest and Osstell Mentor", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 107, pp.513~518 (2009)
- Cehreli MC, "Meta-analysis of methods used to assess implant stability", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.1015~1032 (2009)
- Devlin H, "A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.323~327 (1998)
- Lachmann S, "Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.80~84 (2006)
- Herrero-Climent M, "Assessment of Osstell ISQ’s reliability for implant stability measurement : a cross-sectional clinical study", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 18, pp.e877~e882 (2013)
- Zix J, "Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment : comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.525~530 (2008)
- Andreotti AM, "Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by two different devices : A systematic review", J Periodontol, 88, pp.281~288 (2017)
- Walker L, "Periotest values of dental implants in the first 2 years after second-stage surgery: DICRG interim report no. 8. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group", Implant Dent, 6, pp.207~212 (1997)
- Truhlar RS, "Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants", Ann Periodontol, 5, pp.42~55 (2000)
- Meredith N, "Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.269~275 (1998)
- van Steenberghe D, "Damping characteristics of bone-to-implant interfaces. A clinical study with the Periotest device", Clin Oral Implants Res, 6, pp.31~39 (1995)
- Morris HE, "Bone density : its influence on implant stability after uncovering", J Oral Implantol, 29, pp.263~269 (2003)
- Teerlinck J, "Periotest : an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.55~61 (1991)
- Hürzeler MB, "Influence of the suprastructure on the periimplant tissues in beagle dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 6, pp.139~148 (1995)
- Salvi GE, "Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.116~127 (2004)
- Sekiguhi J, "An attempt to measure viscoelasticity of human facial skin by impact hammer method", J Kanagawa Odontol Soc, 26, pp.387~411 (1992)
- Nedir R, "Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.520~528 (2004)
- Friberg B, "Stability measurements of one-stage Brånemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 28, pp.266~272 (1999)