Effects of Striking and Bone Conditions on Damping Capacity Assessment: An in vitro Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the changes in damping capacity according to the striking and bone conditions of implants placed in a porcine rib using two devices (Periotest; Medizintechnik and AnyCheck; Neobiotech). Materials and Methods: In the first experiment, 20 implant fixtures were placed on porcine ribs and connected at three healing abutment heights (3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 mm). The damping capacities were measured in different vertical angles (0° and +30°) and horizontal directions (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, and distobuccal). The second experiment involved 20 implant fixtures placed on the porcine ribs for bone dehiscence, where the damping capacity was measured only in different horizontal directions (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, and lingual). Results: In the first experiment, lower stability values were observed with higher healing abutment heights and lower vertical angles (p < .05). The horizontal striking direction did not show a difference in the damping capacity value of implants surrounded by intact bone (p > .05) but showed a significant difference in implants with buccal dehiscence defects (p < .05). Conclusion: Striking direction and peri-implant bone conditions can affect Periotest and AnyCheck values. To obtain reproducible values, it is necessary to assess the damping capacity according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the changes in damping capacity according to the striking and bone conditions of implants placed in a porcine rib using two devices (Periotest; Medizintechnik and AnyCheck; Neobiotech). Materials and Methods: In the first experiment, 20 implant fixtures were placed on porcine ribs and connected at three healing abutment heights (3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 mm). The damping capacities were measured in different vertical angles (0° and +30°) and horizontal directions (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, and distobuccal). The second experiment involved 20 implant fixtures placed on the porcine ribs for bone dehiscence, where the damping capacity was measured only in different horizontal directions (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, and lingual). Results: In the first experiment, lower stability values were observed with higher healing abutment heights and lower vertical angles (p < .05). The horizontal striking direction did not show a difference in the damping capacity value of implants surrounded by intact bone (p > .05) but showed a significant difference in implants with buccal dehiscence defects (p < .05). Conclusion: Striking direction and peri-implant bone conditions can affect Periotest and AnyCheck values. To obtain reproducible values, it is necessary to assess the damping capacity according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
참고문헌 (32)
- Brånemark PI, "Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses : I. Experimental studies", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 3, pp.81~100 (1969)
- Adell R, "A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.347~359 (1990)
- Abrahamsson I, "Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces : An experimental study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.381~392 (2004)
- Raghavendra S, "Early wound healing around endosseous implants : a review of the literature", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.425~431 (2005)
- Javed F, "Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants : Factors of influence and evaluation", Interv Med Appl Sci, 5, pp.162~167 (2013)
- Ericsson I, "A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-toimplant contact on machine-prepared roughened titanium and dental implants : A pilot study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 5, pp.202~206 (1994)
- Wennerberg A, "A histomorphometric study of screw-shaped and removal torque titanium implants with three different surface topographies", Clin Oral Implants Res, 6, pp.24~30 (1995)
- Sennerby L, "Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis : Biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications", Periodontol 2000, 47, pp.51~66 (2008)
- Swami V, "Current trends to measure implant stability", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 16, pp.124~130 (2016)
- Aparicio C, "The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant : 8-year report", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 17, pp.150~161 (1997)
- Cranin AN, "Evaluation of the Periotest as a diagnostic tool for dental implants", J Oral Implantol, 24, pp.139~146 (1998)
- Atsumi M, "Methods used to assess implant stability : Current status", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.743~754 (2007)
- Faulkner MG, "Measuring abutment", implant joint integrity with the Periotest instrument, 1999, pp.14, 681~688
- Olivé J, "The Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.390~400 (1990)
- Teerlinck J, "Periotest : An objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.55~61 (1991)
- Morris HF, "Bone density : Its influence on implant stability after uncovering", J Oral Implantol, 29, pp.263~269 (2003)
- Faulkner MG, "The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant", abutment systems, 2001, pp.16, 486~494
- Søballe K, "Hydroxyapatite coating modifies implant membrane formation : controlled micromotion studied in dogs", Acta Orthop Scand, 63, pp.128~140 (1992)
- Soballe K, "Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75, pp.270~278 (1993)
- Szmukler-Moncler S, "Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.12~25 (2000)
- Trisi P, "Validation of value of actual micromotion as a direct measure of implant micromobility after healing(secondary implant stability). An in vivo histologic and biomechanical study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.1423~1430 (2016)
- Meredith N, "Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.261~267 (1996)
- Pattijn V, "Resonance frequency analysis of implants in the guinea pig model : Influence of boundary conditions and orientation of the transducer", Med Eng Phys, 29, pp.182~190 (2007)
- Lachmann S, "Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss : An in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.347~355 (2011)
- Aparicio C, "Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant", bone interface, 2006, pp.17, 2~7
- Vidyasagar L, "Dental implant design and biological effects on bone-implant interface", Stomatologija, 6, pp.51~54 (2004)
- Santamaría-Arrieta G, "Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling technique on primary implant stability measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis", J Clin Exp Dent, 8, pp.e307~e311 (2016)[DOI]
- Kao HC, "The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants : A 3-D finite element analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.347~355 (2008)
- Kitamura E, "Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants : Considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.401~412 (2004)
- Bidez MW, "Issues in bone mechanics related to oral implants", Implant Dent, 1, pp.289~294 (1992)
- Rieger MR, "Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.671~676 (1990)
- Merheb J, "Influence of bony defects on implant stability", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.919~923 (2010)
