Reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on various clinical conditions: an in vitro study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on the location of the implant and the position of the patient. Materials and Methods. Six implants were installed in different dentate sextants of six artificial bone models. Implant stability was measured in three conditions of the bone model (without mounting on a phantom head, mounted on a phantom head in supine position, and mounted on a phantom head in upright position). A resonance frequency analysis device (Osstell) and two damping capacity analysis devices (Periotest and Anycheck) were used to measure implant stability. The values measured outside the phantom head were treated as controls, and the values inside the phantom head were compared using an independent t-test. Results. Osstell showed different results in two of the six divisions in both the supine and upright positions compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). Periotest showed different results in all six parts in the supine position and in five parts in the upright position compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). While Anycheck showed different results in five areas in the supine position compared to outside of the mouth, it showed different results in only one area in the upright position (P < .05). Conclusion. In the difficult implant position for the operator to access, the implant stability measuring devices show less reliability. The accessibility of implant is greatly affected in the order of Osstell, Anycheck, and Periotest.
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on the location of the implant and the position of the patient. Materials and Methods. Six implants were installed in different dentate sextants of six artificial bone models. Implant stability was measured in three conditions of the bone model (without mounting on a phantom head, mounted on a phantom head in supine position, and mounted on a phantom head in upright position). A resonance frequency analysis device (Osstell) and two damping capacity analysis devices (Periotest and Anycheck) were used to measure implant stability. The values measured outside the phantom head were treated as controls, and the values inside the phantom head were compared using an independent t-test. Results. Osstell showed different results in two of the six divisions in both the supine and upright positions compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). Periotest showed different results in all six parts in the supine position and in five parts in the upright position compared to outside of the mouth (P < .05). While Anycheck showed different results in five areas in the supine position compared to outside of the mouth, it showed different results in only one area in the upright position (P < .05). Conclusion. In the difficult implant position for the operator to access, the implant stability measuring devices show less reliability. The accessibility of implant is greatly affected in the order of Osstell, Anycheck, and Periotest.
참고문헌 (26)
- Lages FS, "Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis : A systematic review", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20, pp.26~33 (2018)
- Sennerby L, "Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants : a review of the literature", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.408~420 (1998)
- Meredith N, "Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.491~501 (1998)
- Rodrigo D, "Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival : a prospective case series study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.255~261 (2010)
- Atsumi M, "Methods used to assess implant stability : current status", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.743~754 (2007)
- Herrero-Climent M, "In vitro comparative analysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices : Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21, pp.1124~1131 (2019)
- Oh JS, "Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 113, pp.e35~40 (2012)
- Lachmann S, "Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss : an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.347~355 (2011)
- Lachmann S, "Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2:peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.80~84 (2006)
- Sennerby L, "Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis : biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications", Periodontol 2000, 47, pp.51~66 (2008)
- Meredith N, "Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.261~267 (1996)
- Sim CP, "Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.598~604 (2010)
- Huang HM, "Factors influencing the resonance frequency of dental implants", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61, pp.1184~1188 (2003)
- Winkler S, "Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function", J Oral Implantol, 27, pp.198~203 (2001)
- Meredith N, "Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.269~275 (1998)
- 이동훈, "The reliability of Anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 12(2), pp.83~88 (2020), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Andreotti AM, "Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by two different devices : a systematic review", J Periodontol, 88, pp.281~288 (2017)
- Aal MA, "Correlation of implant stability between two noninvasive methods using submerged and nonsubmerged healing protocols : a randomized clinical trial", J Oral Implantol, 46, pp.571~579 (2020)
- Krafft T, "In vitro validation of a novel diagnostic device for intraoperative determination of alveolar bone quality", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.318~328 (2012)
- Pyo SW, "Reliability verification of damping capacity assessment through in vitro analysis of implant micromotion in peri-implant bone loss model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 36, pp.106~114 (2021)
- Zix J, "Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment : comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.525~530 (2008)
- Faulkner MG, "The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant", abutment systems, 2001, pp.16, 486~494
- 박양훈, "임플란트 healing abutment 높이와 타진각도에 따른 타진방식 임플란트 안정성 측정기기의 수치 차이", 대한치과보철학회지, 56(4), pp.278~286 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Derhami K, "Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.221~229 (1995)
- Aparicio C, "Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant", bone interface, 2006, pp.17(Suppl 2), 2~7
- Schulte W, "Periotest for measuring periodontal characteristics--correlation with periodontal bone loss", J Periodontal Res, 27, pp.184~190 (1992)