天聖令 喪葬令과 雜令의 사료적 가치와 역주
On the Value of Miscellaneous Statutes, Mourning and Burial Statutes in the Tiansheng Statutes as Historical Sources and Its Annotated Translation
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the value of the Za Ling(Miscellaneous Statutes), the Sangzang Ling(Mourning and Burial Statutes) in the Tiansheng Statutes as historical sources, by examining the provisions which had been unknown before the discovery of the Tiansheng Statutes, the ones which were contradictory with the previous records or remove their uncertainties, and the ones which suggest significant changes of Chinese society between the Tang and Song Dynasties. Most of the provisions of the Sangzang Ling in the Tiansheng Statutes is succession to the ones in the Tang Statutes. In particular, it is difficult to find out the substantial differences between them in the provisions of the Mourning and Burial system of rites. However, this paper shows that we can find the differences of the Sangzang Ling in the Tang Statutes and the one in the Tiansheng Statutes in the provisions of the allowance grain and silk or cloth for the bereaved, the mourning ceremony, and the funeral rites performed by order of the emperor. The Za Ling fundamentally consists of miscellaneous and disorganized provisions, so the provisions of the Za Ling in the Tiansheng Statutes are not highly correlated with one another. The Za Ling in the Tiansheng that were not currently enforced during the Tiansheng reign of Emperor Renzong of Song are more historically significant and valuable than compared to the Current Za Ling in the Tiansheng Statutes in that the related provisions are not identified within the documents of the Tang and Song periods yet. The author focused on the changes from the Tiansheng Statutes of the Northern Song to the Qingyuan Statutes of the Southern Song both in this paper and annotated translation on the Sangzang Ling, Za Ling in the Tiansheng Statutes.
Abstract
This paper discusses the value of the Za Ling(Miscellaneous Statutes), the Sangzang Ling(Mourning and Burial Statutes) in the Tiansheng Statutes as historical sources, by examining the provisions which had been unknown before the discovery of the Tiansheng Statutes, the ones which were contradictory with the previous records or remove their uncertainties, and the ones which suggest significant changes of Chinese society between the Tang and Song Dynasties. Most of the provisions of the Sangzang Ling in the Tiansheng Statutes is succession to the ones in the Tang Statutes. In particular, it is difficult to find out the substantial differences between them in the provisions of the Mourning and Burial system of rites. However, this paper shows that we can find the differences of the Sangzang Ling in the Tang Statutes and the one in the Tiansheng Statutes in the provisions of the allowance grain and silk or cloth for the bereaved, the mourning ceremony, and the funeral rites performed by order of the emperor. The Za Ling fundamentally consists of miscellaneous and disorganized provisions, so the provisions of the Za Ling in the Tiansheng Statutes are not highly correlated with one another. The Za Ling in the Tiansheng that were not currently enforced during the Tiansheng reign of Emperor Renzong of Song are more historically significant and valuable than compared to the Current Za Ling in the Tiansheng Statutes in that the related provisions are not identified within the documents of the Tang and Song periods yet. The author focused on the changes from the Tiansheng Statutes of the Northern Song to the Qingyuan Statutes of the Southern Song both in this paper and annotated translation on the Sangzang Ling, Za Ling in the Tiansheng Statutes.
참고문헌 (53)
- "舊唐書", ~
- "新唐書", ~
- "宋史", ~
- "唐律疏議", 中華書局
- "大唐開元禮", 民族出版社
- "唐六典", 中華書局
- "通典", 中華書局
- "資治通鑑", 中華書局
- "五代會要", 上海古籍出版社
- "宋刑統", 中華書局
- "司馬氏書儀"
- "續資治通鑑長編", 中華書局
- "宋會要輯稿", 中華書局
- 中國珍稀法律典籍續, "慶元條法事類" (2002), 黑龍江人民出版社
- 睡虎地秦墓竹簡整理小組, "睡虎地秦墓竹簡" (1978), 文物出版社
- 張家山二四七號漢墓竹簡整理小組, "張家山漢墓竹簡: 二四七號墓" (2006), 文物出版社
- 天一閣博物館, "天一閣藏明鈔本天聖令校證 附唐令復原硏究" (2006), 中華書局
- "令義解"
- "令集解"
- 김택민, "천성령 역주" (2013), 혜안
- 仁井田, "唐令拾遺" (1964), 東京大學出版會
- 池田溫, "唐令拾遺補" (1999), 東京大學出版會
- 高明士, "‘天聖令學’與唐宋變革", 漢學硏究, 31(1) (2013)
- 戴建國, "天一閣藏明抄本'官品令'考", 歷史硏究, 3 (1999)
- 戴建國, "唐‘開元二十五年令ㆍ雜令’復原硏究", 文史, 3 (2006)
- 賴亮郡, "唐代特殊官人的告身給付‘–天聖令 雜令’ 唐13條再釋", 師大歷史學報, 43 (2010)
- 徐暢, "存世唐代告身及其相關硏究述略", 中國史硏究動態, 3 (2012)
- 沈宗憲, "新史料ㆍ新觀點ㆍ新視角:天聖令論集 下" (2011), 元照出版公司
- 楊梅, "唐宋宮廷藏氷制度的沿襲與變革 –以‘天聖令ㆍ雜令’宋12條爲中心", 唐硏究, 14 (2008)
- 吳麗娛, "天一閣藏明鈔本天聖令校證 附唐令復原硏究 下" (2006), 中華書局
- 吳麗娛, "從〈天聖令〉對唐令的修改看唐宋制度之變遷 –‘喪葬令’硏讀筆記三篇", 唐硏究, 12 (2006)
- 吳麗娛, "唐代贈官的贈賻與贈諡 –從<天聖令>看唐代贈官制度", 唐硏究, 14 (2008)
- 吳麗娛, "新史料ㆍ新觀點ㆍ新視角:天聖令論集 下" (2011), 元照出版公司
- 王靜, "唐墓石室規制及相關喪葬制度硏究 –復原唐“喪葬令”第25條令文釋證", 唐硏究, 14 (2008)
- 王靜, "唐墓埋葬告身的等級問題", 北京大學學報, 4 (2013)
- 秦大樹, "宋代喪葬習俗的變革及其體現的社會意義", 唐硏究, 11 (2005)
- 劉後濱, "唐代告身的抄寫與給付 –天聖令ㆍ雜令 唐13條釋讀", 唐硏究, 14 (2008)
- 李錦繡, "唐後期官與吏界限的幾點思考", 暨南史學, 4 (2005)
- 趙璐璐, "唐代“雜任”考–<天聖令ㆍ雜令>“雜任”條解讀", 唐硏究, 14 (2008)
- 趙璐璐, "唐代“雜職”考", 文史, 3 (2010)
- 皮慶生, "唐宋時期五服制度入令過程試探 –以<喪葬令>所附<喪葬年月>爲中心", 唐硏究, 14 (2008)
- 黃玫茵, "評‘天一閣藏明鈔本天聖令校證附唐令復原硏究’", 唐硏究, 14 (2008)
- 黃正建, "天一閣藏明鈔本天聖令校證 附唐令復原硏究" (2006), 中華書局
- 黃正建, "‘天聖令’附唐令是開元二十五年令碼?", 中國史硏究, 4 (2007)
- 黃正建, "‘天聖令ㆍ雜令’の整理と硏究", 日本古代學, 2 (2010)
- 黃正建, "新史料ㆍ新觀點ㆍ新視角:天聖令論集 (下)" (2011), 元照出版有限公司
- 黃正建, "天聖令與唐宋制度硏究" (2011), 中國社會科學院出版社
- 黃正建, "天聖令與唐宋制度硏究" (2011), 中國社會科學出版社
- 岡野誠, "北宋天聖雜令中の水利法規について", 法史學硏究會會報, 11 (2006)
- 稻田奈津子, "北宋天聖令による唐喪葬令復原硏究の再檢討–條文排列を中心に–", 東京大學史料編纂所硏究紀要, 18 (2008)
- 稻田奈津子, "日唐律令比較硏究の新段階" (2008), 山川出版社
- 服部一隆, "日本における天聖令硏究の現狀–日本古代史硏究を中心に", 古代學硏究所紀要, 12 (2010)
- 三上喜孝, "北宋天聖雜令に關する覺書 –日本令との比較の觀点から–", 山形大學歷史ㆍ地理ㆍ人類學論集, 8 (2007)