본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

발해의 종족적 연원

The Tribal Origin of the Balhae People

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

While the “Balhae/Malgal” chapter of the Chinese historical text 『Gu-Dang’seo(History of Dang, Former version)』, published in the mid-10th century, dictates that Dae Jo-yeong, the founder of Balhae, was from a Goguryeo descent, the “Balhae” chapter of the Chinese text 『Shin-Dang’seo(History of Dang, Later version)』, which was published a hundred years later, dictates that the Balhae people were composed of the Sog’mal Mal’gal tribes which succumbed to the protection of Goguryeo. The latter book did not specify about Dae Jo-yeong’s descent. Scholars have been agreeing with either references and have tried to come up with a reasonable mix of the two rather conflicting references. Yet the scholars did not consider the possibility that both references might be referring to different situations and are indeed true at the same time, and they did not take into account the fact that both historical texts were created by different people living in different ages and with different agendas. By the examination attempted in this study, it seems that both historical texts are delivering their own truths. Dae Jo-yeong was originally from Goguryeo, so in 『Gu-Dang’seo』 he was described as a man from a Goguryeo descent. He gathered together not only the Goguryeo people under his command but also the pro-Goguryeo Sog’mal Mal’gal tribes who were living in adjacent regions, and then founded Balhae. Then, during the exodus from Dang, which enabled the Balhae foundation in the first place, the Sog’mal Mal’gal tribes played an instrumental role. So the author of 『Shin-Dang’seo』, who believed that Balhae was a dynasty with the Mal’gal people, recorded that Balhae was of the Sog’mal Mal’gal tribes. In the end, we can say that Balhae had a dual descent, from both Goguryeo and Sog’mal Mal’gal. Recently some Korean scholars have been suggesting the possibility that Dae Jo-yeong might have been a Sog’mal Mal’gal entity in his blood, yet culturally transformed by the Goguryeo influence. This is simply not right. The authors of both texts that are mentioned above were not interested in elaborating upon bloodlines or the Balhae people’s level of transformation. They were only interested in the Balhae people’s origins. Academic approaches to such issue should be reviewed in the future.

Abstract

While the “Balhae/Malgal” chapter of the Chinese historical text 『Gu-Dang’seo(History of Dang, Former version)』, published in the mid-10th century, dictates that Dae Jo-yeong, the founder of Balhae, was from a Goguryeo descent, the “Balhae” chapter of the Chinese text 『Shin-Dang’seo(History of Dang, Later version)』, which was published a hundred years later, dictates that the Balhae people were composed of the Sog’mal Mal’gal tribes which succumbed to the protection of Goguryeo. The latter book did not specify about Dae Jo-yeong’s descent. Scholars have been agreeing with either references and have tried to come up with a reasonable mix of the two rather conflicting references. Yet the scholars did not consider the possibility that both references might be referring to different situations and are indeed true at the same time, and they did not take into account the fact that both historical texts were created by different people living in different ages and with different agendas. By the examination attempted in this study, it seems that both historical texts are delivering their own truths. Dae Jo-yeong was originally from Goguryeo, so in 『Gu-Dang’seo』 he was described as a man from a Goguryeo descent. He gathered together not only the Goguryeo people under his command but also the pro-Goguryeo Sog’mal Mal’gal tribes who were living in adjacent regions, and then founded Balhae. Then, during the exodus from Dang, which enabled the Balhae foundation in the first place, the Sog’mal Mal’gal tribes played an instrumental role. So the author of 『Shin-Dang’seo』, who believed that Balhae was a dynasty with the Mal’gal people, recorded that Balhae was of the Sog’mal Mal’gal tribes. In the end, we can say that Balhae had a dual descent, from both Goguryeo and Sog’mal Mal’gal. Recently some Korean scholars have been suggesting the possibility that Dae Jo-yeong might have been a Sog’mal Mal’gal entity in his blood, yet culturally transformed by the Goguryeo influence. This is simply not right. The authors of both texts that are mentioned above were not interested in elaborating upon bloodlines or the Balhae people’s level of transformation. They were only interested in the Balhae people’s origins. Academic approaches to such issue should be reviewed in the future.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 박시형, "발해" (1979), 김일성종합대학출판사
  2. 박시형, "발해사" (1989), 이론과 실천
  3. 宋基豪, "渤海政治史硏究" (1995), 일조각
  4. 宋基豪, "발해를 다시 본다" (1999), 주류성
  5. 임상선, "발해의 지배세력 연구" (1999), 신서원
  6. 韓圭哲, "발해의 대외관계사" (1994), 신서원
  7. 金毓黻, "신편 발해국지장편" (2008), 신서원
  8. 楊家駱, "二十五史識語" (1980), 鼎文書局
  9. 吳縝, "新唐書糾謬 ; 1997, 四庫全書薈要 子部 제17冊" (1997), 길림인민출판사
  10. 王承禮, "발해의 역사" (1987), 한림대학출판부
  11. 劉節, "중국사학사 강의" (2000), 신서원
  12. 조성을, "중국사학사" (2009), 혜안
  13. 錢冬父, "唐宋古文運動" (2009), 學古房
  14. 김기흥, "발해 건국집단의 역사적 정체성", 역사학보, (210), pp.29~57 (2011), 역사학회
  15. 盧泰敦, "고구려 유민사 연구-요동, 당내지 및 돌궐방면의 집단을 중심으로", 한우근박사정년기념사학논총 (1981), 지식산업사
  16. 盧泰敦, "渤海國의 주민구성과 발해인의 族源 , 한국고대의 국가와 사회" (1985), 일조각
  17. 노태돈, "발해국의 주민구성에 대한 연구 현황과 과제―‘高麗別種’과 ‘渤海族’을 둘러싼 논의를 중심으로―", 한국사연구, (122), pp.11~309 (2003), 한국사연구회
  18. 박시형, "발해사 연구를 위하여 , 력사과학 1962-1" (1962), 과학원출판사
  19. 송기호, "용해구역 고분 발굴에서 드러난 발해국의 성격", 고구려발해연구, 38, pp.137~153 (2010), 고구려발해학회
  20. 李龍範, "발해왕국의 형성과 高句麗遺族(하)", 동국대학교논문집, 11 (1973), 동국대학교
  21. 정병준, "營州의 大祚榮 集團과 渤海國의 性格", 동북아역사논총, (16), pp.7~40 (2007), 동북아역사재단
  22. 古畑, "渤海建國關係記事の再檢討-中國側史料の基礎的檢討", 朝鮮學報, 113 (1984), 朝鮮學會
  23. 和田, "渤海國地理考", 東洋學報, pp.36~4 (1954), 동양학술협회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)