본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고구려 발해의 상관성 연구와 과제

A Study of Interrelationship between Koguryo and Balhae, and its Task

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper points out that the researchers for Balhae, and especially for Koguryo, have ignored the study of the continuity of the Koguryo residents. Furthermore, it urges them to study the continuity of history after the disappearance of Koguryo. The researchers are encouraged to study the construction of the Koguryo residents seriously and actively. And in terms of the history of Balhae, the continuity and interrelationship of the residents of the two dynasties are compared and examined to offer an direction of the research studies. In order to examine the continuity and interrelationship between the two dynasties, we must pay attention to a few points as follows. Above all, we must examine the regional continuity between Koguryo and Balhae. Mostly the farming Koguryo residents stayed at home. In this context, the study of the Koguryo dominion is essential to elucidate the interrelationship with Balhae. Next, the study of politics must be carried on previously before that of the Koguryo residents. If the Koguryo residents were the people of the nation, Koguryo, and later they changed into the people of Malgal suddenly in the era of Balhae, the reason of why they changed as such may result from the era of Koguryo. All of sudden, the background and process of why the people of Malgal became the largest portion of residents in the Southern Manchuria must be examined. We could imagine that during the long period of 700 years of the Koguryo dynasty, there had been a big change for the construction of residents. However, contrary to this, it cannot be denied that most other races were absorbed into the Koguryo residents. In spite that the custom of Balhae was similar to that of Koguryo in 『Jiutangshu(the Book of Old Tang)』, there are many cases of research studies for the cultural interrelationship of the two dynasties. In other words, many scholars misunderstood that the cultural characteristic phenomena between the ruling class and the ruled one might come from the physical evidence which appeared among different peoples. Earthen hole tomb(pit tomb) in earth and hand-made earthenware may be considered as the examples to show the characteristics of the Koguryo residents and the people of Malgal. On the contrary, it is reasonable to say that such cultural phenomena may be the evidence which reveals the characteristics of the Koguryo residents living at the border areas.

Abstract

This paper points out that the researchers for Balhae, and especially for Koguryo, have ignored the study of the continuity of the Koguryo residents. Furthermore, it urges them to study the continuity of history after the disappearance of Koguryo. The researchers are encouraged to study the construction of the Koguryo residents seriously and actively. And in terms of the history of Balhae, the continuity and interrelationship of the residents of the two dynasties are compared and examined to offer an direction of the research studies. In order to examine the continuity and interrelationship between the two dynasties, we must pay attention to a few points as follows. Above all, we must examine the regional continuity between Koguryo and Balhae. Mostly the farming Koguryo residents stayed at home. In this context, the study of the Koguryo dominion is essential to elucidate the interrelationship with Balhae. Next, the study of politics must be carried on previously before that of the Koguryo residents. If the Koguryo residents were the people of the nation, Koguryo, and later they changed into the people of Malgal suddenly in the era of Balhae, the reason of why they changed as such may result from the era of Koguryo. All of sudden, the background and process of why the people of Malgal became the largest portion of residents in the Southern Manchuria must be examined. We could imagine that during the long period of 700 years of the Koguryo dynasty, there had been a big change for the construction of residents. However, contrary to this, it cannot be denied that most other races were absorbed into the Koguryo residents. In spite that the custom of Balhae was similar to that of Koguryo in 『Jiutangshu(the Book of Old Tang)』, there are many cases of research studies for the cultural interrelationship of the two dynasties. In other words, many scholars misunderstood that the cultural characteristic phenomena between the ruling class and the ruled one might come from the physical evidence which appeared among different peoples. Earthen hole tomb(pit tomb) in earth and hand-made earthenware may be considered as the examples to show the characteristics of the Koguryo residents and the people of Malgal. On the contrary, it is reasonable to say that such cultural phenomena may be the evidence which reveals the characteristics of the Koguryo residents living at the border areas.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. 韓圭哲, "高句麗時代의 靺鞨硏究", 釜山史學, 14(15) (1988)
  2. 韓圭哲, "渤海國의 住民構成", 韓國史學報』創刊號 (1996), 고려사학회
  3. 韓圭哲, "渤海의 對外關係 史─南􆨁國의 形成과 展開" (1994), 신서원
  4. 韓圭哲, "渤海國의 高句麗繼承性古墳과 住居文化를 中心으로, In 선사와 고대 9", ~ (1997)
  5. 韓圭哲, "古墳文化를 통해 본 渤海國", 國史館論叢, 85 (1999), 國史 編纂委員會
  6. 한규철, "발해의 고구려 역사 계승 문제", 한국고대사연구, 33, pp.97~116 (2004), 한국고대사학회
  7. 장국종, "발해본토의 주민구성" (1991), 력사과학
  8. 장국종, "발해본토안 말갈인의 분포상태", 력사과학 (1991)
  9. 장국종, "발해의 주민구성, In 발해사연구론문집 1" (1992)
  10. 장국종, "발해사 성립과주민 1" (1998), 사회과학출판사
  11. 한규철, "고구려・발해에 대한 인식의 변천", 대동한문학(大東漢文學), (26), pp.17~60 (2007), 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회)
  12. 조광, "조선후기의 역사인식, In 韓國史學史의 硏究" (1985), 乙酉文化社
  13. 趙珖, "朝鮮後期의 邊境意識", 白山學報, 16 (1974)
  14. 權悳圭, "朝鮮留記" (1924), 尙 文館
  15. 權悳圭, "朝鮮史" (1945), 正音社
  16. 이만열, "단재 신채호의 고대사 인식 시고", 한국사연구, 15 (1977)
  17. 박영석, "단재 신채호의 만주관, In 단재 신채호 선생 100주년기념논집" (1980)
  18. 韓圭哲, "新􆦯와 渤海의 政治的 交涉過程-南􆨁國의 사신파견을 중심으로-", 韓國史 硏究, 43, pp.131~ (1983)
  19. 瑛河, "丹齋 申采浩의 新 三國統一", 民族文化硏究, 17 (1983)
  20. 조중공동고고학발굴대, "중국동북지방의 유적발굴보고(1963-1965)" (1966), 사회과학원출판사
  21. 中國社會科學院考古硏究所編, "頂山與渤海鎭唐代渤海國的貴族墓地與都城遺址" (1997), 中國大 百科全書出版社
  22. 박시형, "발해사연구를 위하여", 력사과학 (1962)
  23. 주영헌, "발해는 고구려의 계승자", 고고민속 (1967)
  24. 주영헌, "발해문화" (1971), 사회과학출판사
  25. 孫玉良, "得恭與 渤海考", 學習與探 (1986)
  26. 王健群, "南 國時代 ”糾謬", 社會科學 戰線 (1995)
  27. 千寬宇, "廣開土王 碑文再, In 全海宗博士華甲記念 叢", pp.562~566 (1977)
  28. 孔錫龜, "高句麗 域 擴張史 硏究", ~ (1998)
  29. 申瀅植, "高句麗의 成長과 域", 白山學報, 47 (1996)
  30. 이인철, "고구려의 대외정복 연구" (2000), 백산자료원
  31. 김진광, "발해의 영역, In 새롭게 본 발해사" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  32. 김동우, "발해의 지방통치체제, In 새롭게 본 발해사" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  33. 柳炳華, "國際法上 領土의 槪念 및 그 權限", 領土問題硏究, pp.74~ (1983)
  34. 譚其, "中國􆨤史地圖集 五冊", pp.78~79 (1982), 地圖出版社
  35. 新妻, "渤海國史及び日本との國交史の硏究" (1969), 東京電機大學出版局
  36. 孫進己, "渤海疆 域考, In 方論叢" (1982)
  37. 魏國忠, "渤海王國据有 東考, In 江史苑" (1985)
  38. 魏國忠, , 民族史硏究, 2 (1995)
  39. 孫進己, "東 史地理 第2卷" (1989), 黑龍江人民出版社
  40. 손영종, "발해의 서변에 대하여(1,2)", 력사과학 (1980)
  41. 魏國忠, "渤海疆域變遷考略", 求是學刊 (1984)
  42. 채태형, "료동반도는 발해국의 령토", 력사과학 (1992)
  43. 韓圭哲, "渤海國의 서쪽 경계에 관한 연구", 역사와 경계, 47 (2003), 부산경남사학회
  44. 전쟁기념관, "발해를 찾아서", ~ (1998)
  45. 윤명철, "고구려말기의 해양활동과 동아지중해의 질서재편", 國史館論叢, 53 (1994)
  46. 申瀅植, "高句麗 千里長城 硏究", 白山學報, 49 (1997)
  47. 채태형, "발해사연구7(력사지리3)", 97~121 (1998)
  48. 朴京哲, "高句麗와 濊貊-高句麗의 住民과 그 文化系統-", 白山學報, 48 (1997)
  49. 韓圭哲, "高句麗時代의 靺鞨硏究", 釜山史學, 14(15) (1988)
  50. 傅 云, "渤海土人新釋, In 黑龍江社會科學" (1999), 黑龍江社會科學
  51. 魏存成, "高句麗渤海墓葬比較, In 古民俗硏究" (1990), 古民俗硏究
  52. 鄭永振, "高句麗·渤海· 靺鞨 墓葬形制 比較硏究", 百濟硏究, 22 (1991)
  53. 鄭永振, "渤海墓葬硏究" (2000), 吉林人民出 版社
  54. 鄭永振, "高句麗·渤海·靺鞨 墓葬形制 比較硏究" (2003), 延邊大學出版社
  55. 孫仁杰, "高句麗石室墓의 起源", 高句麗硏究, 12 (2001)
  56. 魏存成, "高句麗渤海墓葬比較, In 古民俗文化" (1990), 吉林文史出版社
  57. 韓圭哲, "古墳文化를 통해 본 渤海國", 國史館論叢, 85 (1999), 國史編纂委員會
  58. 정찬영, "우리 나라 구들의 유래와 발전", 고고민속 (1966)
  59. 송기호, "한국 고대의 온돌-북옥저, 고구려, 발해" (2005), 서울대학교출판부
  60. 張太湘, "東寧考古拾零", 黑龍江文物集刊 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)