남중국해 분쟁의 국제관계 - 파라셀과 스프래틀리군도 분쟁을 중심으로 -
The international relation on South China Sea：at the core of Paracel and Spratly Islands’ disputes
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 글은 지정학, 천연자원 그리고 세력균형의 변화가 남중국해 분쟁을 결정하는 핵심요인이라는 것을 규명하고 있다. 이 요인들이 상황에 따라서 남중국해 분쟁을 악화시키거나, 중립화시키고 그리고 약화시킬 수 있는 역할을 하고 있다. 이 3가지 요인들이 파라셀과 스프래틀리 문제에 계속해서 영향을 미치고 있지만, 그것들은 주로 다양한 방법으로 작용하고 있다. 남중국해에 존재하고 있는 상황은 국내적, 양자적 그리고다자적 차원에서 민족주의 정서와 위협 인식에서 보다 광범위한 변화를 반영하고 있다. 남중국해 분쟁의 핵심 국가는 중국, 베트남 그리고 필리핀이다. 말레이시아, 브루나이, 인도네시아 그리고 대만도 주권 권리를 주장하고 있지만 그다지 영향을 미치지못하고 있다.
Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine the international relation on South China Sea：at the core of the Paracel and Spratly disputes. The conceptual framework used in this article to test central argument consists of the interconnected parts, the interpretation of territory, natural resources and the balance of power as central geopolitical attributes. This article claims territory, natural resources, and power balance are all driving forces in South China Sea disputes. These issues have varied from being escalating to de-escalating factors in terms of impact. While the three components of geopolitics have continues to influence the Parcel and Spratly issues,they have in recent years primarily acted in divergent manner. Circumstances pertaining to the South Sea have echoed wider changes in nationalist sentiments and threat perceptions at the domestic, bilateral, and multilateral level. The core nations of South China Sea disputes are China, Vietnam and the Philippines. Therefore, this article examines the interact of these states in South China Sea disputes.
참고문헌 (31)
- Agence France-Press, "China-Vietnam ties on the mend, Straits Times", ~ (2008)
- Ang Cheng Guan, "The South China Sea dispute revisited", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 54(2) (2000)
- Sam Bateman, "UNCLOS and Its Limitations as the Foundation for a Regional Maritime Security Regime", The Korea Journal of Defense Analysis, 19(3), pp.27~56 (2007), 한국국방연구원
- Buszynski, Leszek, "Maritime claims and energy cooperation in the south China Sea", Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(1) (2007)
- Catley, Bob, "Spratly：The Dispute in the South China Sea" (1997), Ashgate
- Cordner, Lee G, "The Spratly Islands dispute and the Law of the Sea", Ocean Development and International Law, 25 (1994)
- Djalal, Hasjim, "Preventive Diplomacy in Southeast Asia：Lessons Learned" (2002), The Habibie Center
- Jörn Dosch, "Managing Security in ASEAN-China Relations Liberal Peace of Hegemonic Stability", Asian Perspective, 31(1), pp.209~236 (2007), 극동문제연구소
- Goh, Evelyn, "Southeast Asian perspective on the China Challenge", Journal of strategic Studies, 30(4-5) (2007)
- Gualt, Ian Townsend, "Preventive diplomacy and pro-activity in the South China Sea", Contemporary Southeast Asia, 20(2) (1998)
- "Joint Statement on RP-PRC Consultations on the South China Sea and on Other Areas of Cooperation", 9~10 (1995)
- Joyner, Christopher C, "The Spratly Islands dispute：legal issues and prospects for diplomatic accommodation in:Cooperative Monitoring in the South China Sea" (2002), Praeger
- Kaye, Stuart B, "The Spratly Islands dispute：a lega background, Maritime Studies", ~ (1998)
- Keyuan, Zou, "The Chinese traditional maritime boundary line in the South China Sea and its legal consequences for the resolution of the dispute over the Spratly Islands", International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 14(1) (1999)
- Langton Col. Christopher, "The Military Balance 2007" (2007), International Institute for Strategic Studies
- Lu Ning, "Flashpoint Spratlys!" (1996), Dolphin Trade Press
- Richardson, Michael, "Asia’s hunger for oil and natural gas：rising demand for oil to churn up south China Sea,” Straits Times", 5~ (2008)
- Ross, Robert S, "China’s Naval Nationalism Sources, Prospects, and the U. S. Response", International Security, 34(2), pp.46~51 (2009)
- Rowan, Joshua P, "The US-Japan security alliance, ASEAN, and the south China sea dispute", Asian Survey, 45(3) (2005)
- Segal, Gerald, "Defending China" (1985), Oxford University Press
- Shambaugh, David, "China engages Asia：reshaping the regional order", International Security, 29(3) (2005)
- Testing the waters：Chinese Policy in the South China Sea, "Shephard, Allan", Australian Defense Studies Centre, ~ (1996)
- The South China Sea dispute：prospects for preventive diplomacy, "Snyder Scott", United Institute of Peace, ~ (1996)
- Thomas, Bradford L, "The Spratly Islands dispute", Geopolitics and International Boundaries, 1 (1996)
- Can China resolve the South China Sea dispute?, "Tonnesson, Stein", ~, pp.working Paper, No. 39 (2000)
- An international history of the dispute in the south China sea, "Tonnesson, Stein", ~, pp.Working paper, No.71 (2001)
- Tonnesson, Stein, "no-Vietnamese rapprochement and the south China Sea irritant", Security Dialogue, 34(1) (2003)
- Tonnesson, Stein, "Locating the South China Sea in:Locating Southeast Asia：Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space" (2005), Singapore University Press
- Wain, Barry, "Gloria Arroyo at sea with China", Far Eastern Economic Review (2008)
- Wurfel, David, "Between China and ASEAN：the dialectics of recent Vietnamese foreign policy in:Vietnamese Foreign Policy in Transition" (1999), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
- "U.S. Takes a Tougher Tone with China"[URL]