본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임파워링 리더십, 심리적 안전감, 팀 효과성의 구조적 관계: 국내 A 대기업 사무직을 대상으로

The Structural Relationship Among Empowering Leadership, Psychological Safety and Team Effectiveness

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구는 임파워링 리더십이 심리적 안전감과 팀 효과성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 살펴보고 또한 이 변수들 사이에는 어떠한 구조적인 관계가 존재하는지를 확인하는데 목적이 있다. 연구를 위해 국내 A 대기업 사무직 1,000명을 대상으로 자료를 수집하였다. 구조방정식을 통해서 연구문제를 분석한 결과, 세 변수의 구조적 관계가 수집된 자료에서도 적합하다는 사실을 보여주었다(χ2=274.358, df= 41, RMSEA= .085, CFI= .971, TLI= .961, SRMR= .029). 각 경로계수들 간의 유의성을 통해 변인들 사이의 관계를 확인한 결과 임파워링 리더십과 팀 효과성 간의 상관관계는 정적으로 유의하며, 임파워링 리더십과 심리적 안전감, 심리적 안전감과 팀 효과성 간의 상관관계도 정적으로 유의하게 나타났다. 또한 심리적 안전감은 임파워링 리더십과 팀 효과성과의 관계를 매개했다. 임파워링 리더십이 팀 효과성에 미치는 직접적인 영향(β=.343) 보다 심리적 안전감을 통해 팀 효과성에 미치는 간접적인 영향(β=.493)이 더 큰 것으로 확인되었다. 이와 같은 연구결과를 바탕으로 본 연구의 논의가 제시되었으며, 후속연구를 위한 제언을 제시하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how empowering leadership affects psychological safety and team effectiveness, and to identify what structural relationships exist among these variables. For this study, data were collected from 1,000 domestic office workers at a large corporation in Korea, and structural equational model was used for analyzing the data(χ2=274.358, df= 41, RMSEA= .085, CFI= .971, TLI= .961, SRMR= .029). The research findings are as follows: first, in the relationship between variables through the significance of each path coefficient, the correlation between the empowering leadership and the team effectiveness was statistically significant. The correlation between the empowering leadership and psychological safety, psychological safety and team effectiveness were statistically significant as well. Last, psychological safety mediated the relationship between empowering leadership and team effectiveness. The indirect effect (β = .493) on psychological safety was found to be greater than the direct effect of empowering leadership on team effectiveness (β = .343). Based on these findings, the discussion of this study and suggestions for subsequent research were presented.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. 김수진, "임파워링 리더십과 건설적 발언 행동의 관계: 심리적 안전감의 매개효과", 리더십연구, 11(1), pp.3~32 (2019), 리더십학회
  2. 방호진, "공유리더십과 심리적 안전 분위기가 팀 성과, 팀 몰입 및 변화지향 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구 : 팀 성찰의 매개효과를 중심으로", 박사, 경영학과 조직·인사전공, pp.2013
  3. 심덕섭, "팀장의 임파워링 리더십이 팀 지식공유 및 팀 효능감에 미치는 영향", 인적자원관리연구, 24(3), pp.43~59 (2017), 한국인적자원관리학회
  4. 양동민, "심리적 안전감과 상사신뢰가 조직몰입 및 직무성과에 미치는 영향 : 조직후원인식의 매개효과", HRD연구, 11(2), pp.179~202 (2009), 한국인력개발학회[DOI]
  5. 탁제운, "참여적 리더십이 발언행동과 목표몰입에 미치는 영향: 리더신뢰와 심리적 안전감의 매개효과를 중심으로", HRD연구, 19(3), pp.39~72 (2017), 한국인력개발학회[DOI]
  6. 홍세희, "구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거", 한국심리학회지임상, 19(1), pp.161~177 (2000)
  7. 홍아정, "임파워링 리더십, 잡 크래프팅, 조직몰입, 직무배태성 간 구조적 관계", HRD연구, 20(2), pp.51~85 (2018), 한국인력개발학회[DOI]
  8. Ainoya, N, "Demographic diversity, team process, and team performance: Assessing moderator effects of cognitive conflict management practices and task interdependence", Doctor, pp.2004
  9. Ahearne, M, "To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, pp.945~955 (2005)
  10. Amundsen, S, "Empowering leadership : Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale", The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), pp.487~511 (2014)
  11. Amundsen, S, "Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity : The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment", Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 22(3), pp.304~323 (2015)
  12. Austin, J. T, "The criterion problem : 1917-1992", Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, pp.836~874 (1992)
  13. Bienefeld, N, "Speaking up in ad hoc multiteam systems : Individual level effects of psychological safety, status, and leadership within and across teams", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(6), pp.930~945 (2014)
  14. Bradley, B. H, "Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams : The critical role of team psychological safety climate", Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), pp.151~158 (2012)
  15. Browne, M. W, "Testing structural equation models", pp.136~162 (1993), Sage
  16. Campion, M. A, "Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness : Implications for designing effective work groups", Personnel Psychology, 46(4), pp.823~850 (1993)
  17. Carless, S. A, "The measurement of cohesion in work teams", Small Group Research, 31(1), pp.71~88 (2000)
  18. Carmeli, A, "Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace : The mediating role of psychological safety", Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), pp.250~260 (2010)
  19. Cheong, M, "Two faces of empowering leadership : Enabling and burdening", Leadership Quarterly, 27, pp.602~616 (2016)
  20. Conger, J. A, "The empowerment process : Integrating theory and practice", Academy of Management Review, 13(3), pp.471~482 (1988)
  21. Deci, E. L, "Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior" (1985), Plenum
  22. Deci, E. L, "Self-determination in a work organization", Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), pp.580~590 (1989)
  23. Deci, E. L, "Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country : A cross-cultural study of self-determination", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), pp.930~942 (2001)
  24. Detert, J. R, "Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?", Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), pp.869~884 (2007)
  25. Druskat, V. U, "Managing from the boundary : The effective leadership of self-managing work teams", Academy of Management Journal, 46, pp.435~457 (2003)
  26. Edmondson, A. C, "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams", Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), pp.350~383 (1999)
  27. Edmondson, A. C, "Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy" (2012), John Wiley & Sons
  28. Goodman, P, "Research in organizational behavior vol. 9", pp.121~173 (1987), JAI Press
  29. Hackman, J. R, "Handbook of organizational behavior", pp.315~342 (1987), Prentice-Hall
  30. Hackman, J. R, "Leading teams : Creating conditions for great performances" (2002), Harvard Business School Press
  31. Hackman, J. R, "A theory of team coaching", Academy of Management Review, 30, pp.269~287 (2005)
  32. Han, S. J, "Developing team creativity : The influence of psychological safety and relation-oriented shared leadership", Performance Improvement Quarterly, 32(2), pp.159~182 (2019)
  33. Hu, L. T, "Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification", Psychological Methods, 3, pp.424~453 (1998)
  34. Hui, C, "Effects of leadership empowerment behaviors and followers’personal control, voice, and self-efficacy on in-role and extra-role performance: An extension and empirical test of Conger and Kanungo’s empowerment process model", Doctor, pp.1994
  35. Humphrey, S. E, "Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features : A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature", Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), pp.1332~1356 (2007)
  36. Kahn, W. A, "Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work", Academy of Management Journal, 33, pp.692~724 (1990)
  37. La Guardia, J. G, "Within-person variation security of attachment : A self-determinism theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being", Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79(3), pp.367~384 (2000)
  38. Langfred, C. W, "Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the  effects of cohesiveness on performance", Small Group Research, 29, pp.124~143 (1998)
  39. Leroy, H, "Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety : A team-level study", Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, pp.1273~1281 (2012)
  40. Liu, W, "Matching leadership styles with employment modes : Strategic human resource management perspective", Human Resource Management Review, 13, pp.127~152 (2003)
  41. Li, A. N, "What happens when you trust your supervisor? Mediators of individual performance in trust relationships", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, pp.407~425 (2012)
  42. Madjar, N, "Trust in supervisors and trust in customers : Their independent, relative, and joint effects on employee performance and creativity", Human Performance, 22, pp.128~142 (2009)
  43. May, D. R, "The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, pp.11~37 (2004)
  44. MacCallum, R. C, "Sample size in factor analysis", Psychological Methods, 4(1), pp.84~99 (1999)
  45. McClelland, D. C, "Power : The inner experience" (1975), Irvington Press
  46. McGrath, J. E, "Social psychology : A brief introduction" (1964), Holt, Rinehart & Winston
  47. Neilsen, E, "Executive power", pp.78~110 (1986), Jossey-Bass
  48. Newman, A, "Psychological safety : A systematic review of the literature", Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), pp.521~535 (2017)
  49. Olson, A. M, "A theory and taxonomy of individual team member performance", Doctor, pp.2000
  50. Preacher, K. J, "Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models", Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), pp.879~891 (2008)
  51. Schaubroeck, J, "Cognition-based and affect-base trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, pp.863~871 (2011)
  52. Sorrentino, R. M, "Uncertainty orientation and trust : Individual differences in close relationships", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, pp.314~327 (1995)
  53. organizational psychology, "Issues, theory, and research in industrial", pp.1992, Tannenbaum, S. I
  54. Thomas, K. W, "Does empowerment always work : Understanding the role of intrinsic motivation and personal interpretation", Journal of Management Systems, 6, pp.39~54 (1994)
  55. Thomas, K. W, "Cognitive elements of empowerment : An"interpretive"model of intrinsic task motivation", Academy of Management Review, 15(4), pp.666~681 (1990)
  56. Wageman, R, "The team diagnostic survey : Development of an instrument", Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, pp.373~398 (2005)
  57. West, S. G, "Structural equation modeling: Issues, concepts, and applications", pp.56~75 (1995), Sage
  58. Van de Ven, A. H, "Measuring and assessing organizations" (1980), John Wiley & Sons
  59. Vecchio, R. P, "Empowering leadership : An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure", The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), pp.530~542 (2010)
  60. Yun, S, "The influence of leader behaviors on follower self-leadership : An application of hierarchical linear modeling(HLM)", Journal of Industrial Relations, 17, pp.91~136 (2006)
  61. Zhang, X, "Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity : The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement", Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), pp.107~128 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)