본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

倭 왕권과 隼人(하야토)

A Study on Wa(倭) and Hayato(隼人)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper focuses on the relationship of Wa(倭) government and Hayato(隼人) who lived in the southern part of Kusyu(九州) area in the change of foreign relationship in East Asia. Ancient Japanese regarded Hayato as a barbarian minority. Nihonshoki(日本書紀) began to write Hayato in the early 5th century. Hayato served powerful political figures as guard, so sometimes they was called as guard soldier. Because they served powerful political figures as guard, and wailed to death, they was buried near the royal tomb of King of Yuraku(雄略). Hayato in the area of Kinai(畿內) built the chamber tomb(橫穴式墓) which derived from the type of the chamber tomb of the southern part of Kushu. The southern part of Kushu also built the chamber tombs that contained burial goods from Kinai and key hole tomb with a round rear mound(前方後圓墳). These two kind of tombs manifest that Wa government and Hayato had the relationship in the period of mounded tomb(古墳). King of Yuraku(雄略) sent his envoy to Song(宋) dynasty in the southern part of China, bring a foreign document of Wa to Song emperor. In that document, King of Yuraku insisted that his ancestors conquered many barbarian 66 states of southern part of Japanese archipelago to expand their territory(西服衆夷六十六國). I think that 66 states contained Hayato, because many barbarian(衆夷) is not specific name. During the 5th century, Kings of Wa involved in international stage to expand their power and achieve the advanced culture of China. In 5th century, Nihonshoki wrote on Hayato in Kinai. These reflect not only the relationship of Wa and Hayato, but also the active strategy of Wa in the East Asian foreign affairs. In the early 7th century, the record on Hayato in Nihonshoki began to disappear, the record on the people who lived in the islands stretched from the Japanese archipelago(南島人). Sui(隋) dynasty unified China which experienced the long disunion era, expanded the power to East Asia. Emperor Yang(煬帝) of Sui ordered the officer of Sui to seek new culture in East China sea. A officer of Sui bring a kind of armor with clothes to the royal court of Sui. At that time Sui government didn't know which state use that kind of amor, asked that a envoy of Wa. Envoy of Wa said that the armor was used by Yixieguguo(夷邪久國). Eventually envoy of Wa witnessed that Sui dynasty wanted to expand their power to the East China sea, I think envoy of Wa let Wa government know the international strategy of Sui government. Sui government began to know that Yixieguguo is Liuqiuguo(流求國), sent the many army to Liuqiuguo, and conquered Liuqiuyguo. According to the new foreign affairs in East Asia, Wa government endeavored to know the foreign policy of Sui. Although Document of Sui(隋書) wrote that Sui and Wa severed diplomatic relation after A.D 608, but Nihonshoki wrote that Wa government sent envoy of Wa to Sui in A.D 614. Therefore the records on peoples who lived in the islands stretched from the Japanese archipelago(南島人) in Nihonshoki reflect on the active policy of Wa on the expansion of Sui in the early 7th century.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the relationship of Wa(倭) government and Hayato(隼人) who lived in the southern part of Kusyu(九州) area in the change of foreign relationship in East Asia. Ancient Japanese regarded Hayato as a barbarian minority. Nihonshoki(日本書紀) began to write Hayato in the early 5th century. Hayato served powerful political figures as guard, so sometimes they was called as guard soldier. Because they served powerful political figures as guard, and wailed to death, they was buried near the royal tomb of King of Yuraku(雄略). Hayato in the area of Kinai(畿內) built the chamber tomb(橫穴式墓) which derived from the type of the chamber tomb of the southern part of Kushu. The southern part of Kushu also built the chamber tombs that contained burial goods from Kinai and key hole tomb with a round rear mound(前方後圓墳). These two kind of tombs manifest that Wa government and Hayato had the relationship in the period of mounded tomb(古墳). King of Yuraku(雄略) sent his envoy to Song(宋) dynasty in the southern part of China, bring a foreign document of Wa to Song emperor. In that document, King of Yuraku insisted that his ancestors conquered many barbarian 66 states of southern part of Japanese archipelago to expand their territory(西服衆夷六十六國). I think that 66 states contained Hayato, because many barbarian(衆夷) is not specific name. During the 5th century, Kings of Wa involved in international stage to expand their power and achieve the advanced culture of China. In 5th century, Nihonshoki wrote on Hayato in Kinai. These reflect not only the relationship of Wa and Hayato, but also the active strategy of Wa in the East Asian foreign affairs. In the early 7th century, the record on Hayato in Nihonshoki began to disappear, the record on the people who lived in the islands stretched from the Japanese archipelago(南島人). Sui(隋) dynasty unified China which experienced the long disunion era, expanded the power to East Asia. Emperor Yang(煬帝) of Sui ordered the officer of Sui to seek new culture in East China sea. A officer of Sui bring a kind of armor with clothes to the royal court of Sui. At that time Sui government didn't know which state use that kind of amor, asked that a envoy of Wa. Envoy of Wa said that the armor was used by Yixieguguo(夷邪久國). Eventually envoy of Wa witnessed that Sui dynasty wanted to expand their power to the East China sea, I think envoy of Wa let Wa government know the international strategy of Sui government. Sui government began to know that Yixieguguo is Liuqiuguo(流求國), sent the many army to Liuqiuguo, and conquered Liuqiuyguo. According to the new foreign affairs in East Asia, Wa government endeavored to know the foreign policy of Sui. Although Document of Sui(隋書) wrote that Sui and Wa severed diplomatic relation after A.D 608, but Nihonshoki wrote that Wa government sent envoy of Wa to Sui in A.D 614. Therefore the records on peoples who lived in the islands stretched from the Japanese archipelago(南島人) in Nihonshoki reflect on the active policy of Wa on the expansion of Sui in the early 7th century.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 연민수, "天皇制성립 이전의 王權, In 천황과 일본문화", pp.13~41 (2004), 한림대학교 출판부
  2. 장인성, "倭 왕권과 蝦夷(에미시) - 고대 동아시아 국제정세와 관련하여-", 역사와 담론, (52), pp.155~176 (2009), 호서사학회
  3. 百濟と倭國辻秀人, "倭の外交における蝦夷と渡來人" (2008), 高志書院
  4. 井上辰雄, "硏究の手引, In 雄襲と隼人", pp.245~248 (1978), 敎育社
  5. 中村明藏, "隼人の硏究" (1977), 學生社
  6. 中村明藏, "古代隼人社會の構造と展開" (1998), 岩田書院
  7. 中村明藏, "隼人の古代史" (2001), 平凡社
  8. 田中 聰, "蝦夷と隼人·南島の社會, In 日本史講座1, 東アジアにおける國家の形成", pp.267~270 (2004), 東京大學出版會
  9. 松倉文比古, "景行天皇紀の構成-熊襲·九州親征記事を中心として, In 日本書紀の天皇像と神祇傳承", pp.112~149 (2009), 雄山閣
  10. 原口耕一郞, "記⦁紀隼人關係記事の再檢討", 人間文化硏究, (9), pp.198~204 (2008), 名古屋市立大學
  11. 井上滿郞, "畿內移住後の隼人をめぐって, In 古事記の新硏究" (2006), 學生社
  12. 廣瀨和雄, "前方後圓墳國家", pp.7~ (2003), 角川書店
  13. 都出比呂志, "日本古代の國家形成論序說", pp.49~94 (2005), 高書房
  14. 白石太一郞, "船山古墳の墓主は誰か, In 東アジアと江田船山古墳", pp.28~54 (2002), 雄山閣
  15. 佐藤長門, "有銘刀劍の下賜·顯彰, In 文字と古代日本1, 支配と文字", pp.32~39 (2004), 吉川弘文館
  16. 吉村武彦, "ヤマト王權と律令制國家の形成, In 列島の古代史8, 古代史の流れ", pp.85~95 (2006), 岩波書店
  17. 中村明藏, "序章 隼人社會の推移とその性格, In 隼人と律令國家", pp.3~ (1993), 名著出版
  18. 熊谷公男, "蝦夷の誓約", 奈良古代史論集, 1, pp.15~26 (1985)
  19. 小島憲之, "日本書紀2", pp.502~ (1996), 小學館
  20. 田中史生, "7-11世紀の奄美·沖繩諸島と國際社會", 自然·人間·社會, (38) (2005)
  21. 高梨 修, "南方世界への廣ガり, In 日本の對外關係2, 律令國家と東アジア", pp.319~333 (2011), 吉川弘文館
  22. 김은숙, "7세기 동아시아의 국제 관계―수의 등장 이후 백제 멸망까지를 중심으로―", 한일관계사연구, (26), pp.45~93 (2007), 한일관계사학회
  23. 森公章, "東アジアの動亂と倭國", pp.204~246 (2006), 吉川弘文館
  24. 森公章, "白村江への道, In 白村江以後-國家危機と東アジア外交", pp.31~32 (1998), 講談社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)