본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

倭 왕권과 蝦夷(에미시) - 고대 동아시아 국제정세와 관련하여-

The Emishi(蝦夷) and Wa(倭) in the International Relations of the Ancient East Asia.

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The ancient Japanese regarded the Emishi as a barbarian minority living in the northern area of the Japanese archipelago. Though the Nihonshoki(日本書紀) records about the early Emishi, today's scholars believe that the historical facts on the Emishi can be traced back to the late sixth century. The lines on the Emish in the Nihonsholi, living in the northwestern Japan, increase dramatically from the mid-seventh century period. The East Asia of the mid-seventh century witnessed a turmoil in the international relation when the Chinese empires of Sui(隋) and Tang(唐) established new orders in China. During this period the Emishi was a tribute to Wa. Wa, however, built castles enclosed with wooden walls(柵) in the Emish areas. The Nihonshoki records such castles, but only those in the northwestern area. During the 1980's archaeologists found such a castle at the Koriyama(郡山) site of Sendai (仙臺) in the northeastern Japan. The discrepancy of the areas in the writing and digging leads to an inference that castles, those only in the northwest, carried a significance for the writer of the Nihonshoki. The northwest was important for Wa because the envoys from Koguryo(高句麗) arrived at those coastal area. The Wa government also wanted to secure a sea route to Koguryo in an attempt to prepare themselves for the changing international order of the time. Wa believed Koguryo could be a good partner for the tumultuous time. During the Saimei reign(齊明, 655-661), the King ordered three times a large fleet under the command of Ahenohirafu(阿倍比羅夫) to the Hokaido(北海道) area. The expeditions were not to conquer the island but to search for a route to Koguryo. In the year of 659, the King sent an envoy with two Emishi people to Tang(唐). The Tang Emperor, Gaozong(高宗) was pleased with the tribute of Emishi, asking the Wa envoy about the situation of the Emishi. The envoy answered with an emphasis on the Emishi's tributary status to Wa. The Gaozong, however, showed interest only to the Emishi. The Chinese history records the occasion. The Tongdian(通典) and the Tanghuiyao(唐會要) writes the Emishi as an independent polity as well as Wa. When the Wa envoy arrived at the Tang capital in the year of 659, the Tang's plan to invade Baekje(百濟) was already in motion. The envoy could not accomplish its mission of easing the tension between Tang and Wa. The envoy was released back to home island in 661 only after the invasion was carried out. Hereafter the Emishi disappeared from the historical writings of the East Asia.

Abstract

The ancient Japanese regarded the Emishi as a barbarian minority living in the northern area of the Japanese archipelago. Though the Nihonshoki(日本書紀) records about the early Emishi, today's scholars believe that the historical facts on the Emishi can be traced back to the late sixth century. The lines on the Emish in the Nihonsholi, living in the northwestern Japan, increase dramatically from the mid-seventh century period. The East Asia of the mid-seventh century witnessed a turmoil in the international relation when the Chinese empires of Sui(隋) and Tang(唐) established new orders in China. During this period the Emishi was a tribute to Wa. Wa, however, built castles enclosed with wooden walls(柵) in the Emish areas. The Nihonshoki records such castles, but only those in the northwestern area. During the 1980's archaeologists found such a castle at the Koriyama(郡山) site of Sendai (仙臺) in the northeastern Japan. The discrepancy of the areas in the writing and digging leads to an inference that castles, those only in the northwest, carried a significance for the writer of the Nihonshoki. The northwest was important for Wa because the envoys from Koguryo(高句麗) arrived at those coastal area. The Wa government also wanted to secure a sea route to Koguryo in an attempt to prepare themselves for the changing international order of the time. Wa believed Koguryo could be a good partner for the tumultuous time. During the Saimei reign(齊明, 655-661), the King ordered three times a large fleet under the command of Ahenohirafu(阿倍比羅夫) to the Hokaido(北海道) area. The expeditions were not to conquer the island but to search for a route to Koguryo. In the year of 659, the King sent an envoy with two Emishi people to Tang(唐). The Tang Emperor, Gaozong(高宗) was pleased with the tribute of Emishi, asking the Wa envoy about the situation of the Emishi. The envoy answered with an emphasis on the Emishi's tributary status to Wa. The Gaozong, however, showed interest only to the Emishi. The Chinese history records the occasion. The Tongdian(通典) and the Tanghuiyao(唐會要) writes the Emishi as an independent polity as well as Wa. When the Wa envoy arrived at the Tang capital in the year of 659, the Tang's plan to invade Baekje(百濟) was already in motion. The envoy could not accomplish its mission of easing the tension between Tang and Wa. The envoy was released back to home island in 661 only after the invasion was carried out. Hereafter the Emishi disappeared from the historical writings of the East Asia.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 熊田亮介, "古代國家と東北", pp.1~ (2003), 吉川弘文館
  2. 歷史學硏究會, "日本史講座 第1卷 東アジアにおける國家の形成" (2004), 東京大學出版會
  3. 鈴木靖民, "古代蝦夷の世界と交流" (1996), 名著出版
  4. 辻秀人, "百濟と倭國", pp.175~200 (2008), 高志書院
  5. 熊谷公男, "古代の蝦夷と城柵" (2004), 吉川弘文館
  6. 坂本太郞, "日本書紀と蝦夷 in: 日本古代史の基礎的硏究上" (1964), 東京大學出版會
  7. 熊谷公男, "蝦夷の誓約 in: 奈良古代史論集 第一集", pp.15~26 (1985)
  8. 藤澤敦, "列島の古代史1 古代史の舞臺", pp.66~79 (2006), 岩波書店
  9. 吉田晶, "古代日本の國家形成", pp.158~159 (2005), 新日本出版社
  10. "日本書紀", ~
  11. 高橋富雄, "東北古代史の硏究", pp.105~155 (1986), 吉川弘文館
  12. 佐藤信, "古代の大臣外交についての一考察 in: 境界の日本史", pp.88~105 (1997), 山川出版社
  13. 김은숙, "7세기 동아시아의 국제 관계―수의 등장 이후 백제 멸망까지를 중심으로―", 한일관계사연구, (26), pp.45~93 (2007), 한일관계사학회
  14. 高明士, "天下秩序與君長人身統治 in: 東亞古代的政治與敎育", pp.17~28 (2003), 喜馬拉雅硏究發展基金會
  15. 森公章, "東アジアの動亂と倭國", pp.227~230 (2006), 吉川弘文館
  16. "삼국사기 백제본기 의자왕 2년조", ~
  17. "郡山遺跡-仙臺市文化財팜프렛 제54집", pp.2~ (2004), 仙臺市敎育委員會文化財課
  18. 今泉隆雄, "仙臺郡山遺跡と邊境支配 in: 古代史の舞臺-列島の古代史1", pp.96~97 (2006), 岩波書店
  19. 今泉隆雄, "古代國家と郡山遺跡 in: 郡山遺跡" (2005), 仙臺市敎育委員會
  20. 李成市, "高句麗と日隋外交 in: 古代東アジアの民族と國家", pp.290~293 (1998), 岩波書店
  21. 秋本吉郞校注, "風土記", pp.72~73, 岩波書店
  22. "通典 卷185 蝦夷", ~
  23. "唐會要, 蝦夷國條", ~
  24. 王貞平, "漢唐中日關係論", pp.38~40 (1997), 文津出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)