실험을 포함한 소집단 논증활동에서 나타나는 초등학교 3학년 학생들의 추론 특징
The Characteristics of 3rd Grade Elementary School Students’ Reasoning in Small Group Argumentation including Experiments
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of reasoning in which 3rd grade elementary school students form ideas, design experiments, and interpret the results to solve problems in small group argumentation. For this purpose, 12 3rd-grade students’ small group argumentations including experiments were observed. The researchers analyzed students’ pre- and post-open questionnaires, field notes, and video recordings of small group argumentation. The results of the research are as follows. First, in the initial opinion formation process, a hasty unification of opinions and a transformation of inquiry problem occurred. In the design and execution of experiments, verification experiments and unplanned and arbitrary experiments were performed. They also selectively noticed or accepted claims, evidence, interpretation, and criticism. They could distinguish between the condition and the cause, but they were confused by using inaccurate terms and tended to keep the initial opinions when interpreting the results and drawing conclusions.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of reasoning in which 3rd grade elementary school students form ideas, design experiments, and interpret the results to solve problems in small group argumentation. For this purpose, 12 3rd-grade students’ small group argumentations including experiments were observed. The researchers analyzed students’ pre- and post-open questionnaires, field notes, and video recordings of small group argumentation. The results of the research are as follows. First, in the initial opinion formation process, a hasty unification of opinions and a transformation of inquiry problem occurred. In the design and execution of experiments, verification experiments and unplanned and arbitrary experiments were performed. They also selectively noticed or accepted claims, evidence, interpretation, and criticism. They could distinguish between the condition and the cause, but they were confused by using inaccurate terms and tended to keep the initial opinions when interpreting the results and drawing conclusions.
참고문헌 (31)
- Brown, J. S., "Organizational learning and communities-of-practice : Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation", Organization Science, 2(1), pp.40~57 (1991)
- 조현준, "과학자의 과학적 탐구과정에서 나타나는 귀추적 추론 분석틀 개발", 한국지구과학회지, 29(7), pp.586~601 (2008), 한국지구과학회
- 조현준, "초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(5), pp.495~505 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- 최권용, "개념 만화를 활용한 소집단 과학 탐구활동에서 나타난 초등과학 영재 학생들의 논증활동 분석", 초등과학교육, 33(1), pp.115~128 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Duschl, R. A., "Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education", Studies in Science Education, 38, pp.39~72 (2002)
- 한혜진, "과학영재의 논증 활동에서 나타나는 반박 유형 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(4), pp.717~728 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 장병기, "실험 설계에 나타난 초등 예비교사의 과학적 추론의 특징: 지식과 추론의 상호작용", 초등과학교육, 31(2), pp.227~242 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- Jeon, W. -S., "A comparative study on scientific reasoning skills in Korean and the US college students", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(1), pp.117~127 (1999)
- Kim, M., (2016), Kyoyukkwahaksa
- 김명희, "과학자의 과학적 추론 과정이 가시화된 유전 영역 과학 영재 교수-학습 프로그램의 개발 및 적용", 생물교육, 39(1), pp.31~45 (2011), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Kwon, Y. -J., "Role and process of abduction in elementary school students’generation of hypotheses concerning vapor condensation", Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 24(4), pp.250~257 (2003)
- Lave, J., "Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation" (1991), University of Cambridge Press
- 이규호, "지구과학적 현상의 특성을 고려한 추론 중심 탐구수업 모형 제안", 한국지구과학회지, 31(2), pp.185~202 (2010), 한국지구과학회
- 이석희, "과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 논의 과정 요소의 특성에 관한 연구", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.76~86 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이선경, "소집단 토론에서 발생하는 학생들의 상호작용적 논증 유형 및 특징", 대한화학회지, 50(1), pp.79~88 (2006), 대한화학회
- 이선경, "초등 과학 수업 담화에서 나타나는 과학적 추론 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), pp.181~192 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- Lemke, J., "Talking science: Language, learning and values" (1990), Ablex Publishing
- 임혜진, "과학 문제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생의 논증 특징", 초등과학교육, 31(1), pp.13~24 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 임현주, "초등 단위 학교 영재 수업에서 나타나는 과학적 논증 과정에 대한 탐색", 초등과학교육, 31(4), pp.513~531 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 임재근, "초등학교 영재 학생들의 탐구 활동에서 나타나는 논증 과정 평가 및 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(4), pp.441~450 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Ministry of Education, Korea., "Science curriculum", Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
- 박정은, "논증 구조 교육을 통한 고등학교 학생들의 과학 글쓰기 분석: 과학 글쓰기 장르에 따른 글쓰기 과제를 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), pp.824~847 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 유혜경, "초등학생들의 과학적 논증활동에서 증거의 유형 및 수준 분석", 초등과학교육, 33(1), pp.162~171 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Sprod, T., "‘Nobody really knows’ : The structure and analysis of social constructivist whole class discussions", International Journal of Science Education, 19(8), pp.911~924 (1997)
- Toulmin, S., "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Tytler, R., "Tracing young children’s scientific reasoning", Research in Science Education, 33, pp.433~465 (2003)
- Tytler, R., "From"Try It and See"to strategic exploration : Characterizing young children’s scientific reasoning", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), pp.94~118 (2004)
- Villarroel, C., "Arguing against confirmation bias : The effect of argumentative discourse goals on the use of disconfirming evidence in written argument", International Journal of Educational Research, 79, pp.167~179 (2016)
- Walton, D. N., "Burden of proof", Argumentation, 2(2), pp.233~254 (1988)
- 위수민, "학생 특성에 따른 소그룹 논증 수준 분석", 과학교육연구지, 33(1), pp.1~11 (2009), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- Zimmerman, C., "The development of scientific reasoning skills", Developmental Review, 20(1), pp.99~149 (2000)