개념 만화를 활용한 소집단 과학 탐구활동에서 나타난 초등과학 영재 학생들의 논증활동 분석
An Analysis of Elementary Science-gifted Students’ Argumentation during Small Group Science Inquiry using Concept Cartoon
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Students' argumentation during science inquiry should be regarded important as it could help students to make meaningful connections between theories and experiments and to make scientific claims based on evidences. In this study, elementary science-gifted students' argumentation during small group inquiry was analyzed according to inquiry process. There were three stages of argumentation during students' inquiry. The first argumentation was to predict what would happen(Prediction stage). In this stage, the scientific problem was presented by concept cartoon as a way to start and to facilitate students' argumentation. The second argumentation was to design an experiment to solve the problem(Planning stage) and the third was to interpret the result of experiment(Interpretation stage). The discourse move, level of grounds and their relationship were analyzed to find the characteristics of argumentation during science inquiry. In terms of discourse move, ‘Asking for opinion’ was the most frequent whereas ‘Claim’ or ‘Rebuttal’ were rare. Students tended to listen to or ask others' opinion rather than provide their own claims or critics on others' opinion. ‘Rebuttal’ was shown a few times only during prediction and planning stage. There was no single ‘Rebuttal’ during interpretation stage. Students tended to easily accept or agree other student's interpretation of data instead of arguing their own ideas. In terms of level of grounds, students mostly provided their ideas without any attempt to justify their position. Especially during planning stage, students tended to suggest or decide ways of measuring or controlling variables without any grounds. They used evidences only a few times during prediction stage. In terms of relation between discourse move and level of grounds, students provided grounds most frequently when they dispute others' claims. The level of grounds were higher when they advocate or clarify their own or others’ ideas than when they claim their ideas. The result of this study showed that the quality of elementary science-gifted students' argumentation during science inquiry was undesirable in many ways. Implications for scaffolding and facilitating argumentation during science inquiry were discussed.
Abstract
Students' argumentation during science inquiry should be regarded important as it could help students to make meaningful connections between theories and experiments and to make scientific claims based on evidences. In this study, elementary science-gifted students' argumentation during small group inquiry was analyzed according to inquiry process. There were three stages of argumentation during students' inquiry. The first argumentation was to predict what would happen(Prediction stage). In this stage, the scientific problem was presented by concept cartoon as a way to start and to facilitate students' argumentation. The second argumentation was to design an experiment to solve the problem(Planning stage) and the third was to interpret the result of experiment(Interpretation stage). The discourse move, level of grounds and their relationship were analyzed to find the characteristics of argumentation during science inquiry. In terms of discourse move, ‘Asking for opinion’ was the most frequent whereas ‘Claim’ or ‘Rebuttal’ were rare. Students tended to listen to or ask others' opinion rather than provide their own claims or critics on others' opinion. ‘Rebuttal’ was shown a few times only during prediction and planning stage. There was no single ‘Rebuttal’ during interpretation stage. Students tended to easily accept or agree other student's interpretation of data instead of arguing their own ideas. In terms of level of grounds, students mostly provided their ideas without any attempt to justify their position. Especially during planning stage, students tended to suggest or decide ways of measuring or controlling variables without any grounds. They used evidences only a few times during prediction stage. In terms of relation between discourse move and level of grounds, students provided grounds most frequently when they dispute others' claims. The level of grounds were higher when they advocate or clarify their own or others’ ideas than when they claim their ideas. The result of this study showed that the quality of elementary science-gifted students' argumentation during science inquiry was undesirable in many ways. Implications for scaffolding and facilitating argumentation during science inquiry were discussed.
참고문헌 (24)
- Chin, C, "Using concept cartoons in formative assessment : Scaffolding students’ argumentation", International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), pp.1307~1332 (2009)
- 조현준, "초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(5), pp.495~505 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- Choi, G. Y., "An analysis of elementary sciencegifted students' argumentation during small group science inquiry", 석사, pp.2014
- Clark, D. B., "Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), pp.293~321 (2008)
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Duschl, R. A., "Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education", Studies in Science Education, 38, pp.39~72 (2002)
- 한혜진, "과학영재의 논증 활동에서 나타나는 반박 유형 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(4), pp.717~728 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 정현철, "한국영재교육에서 소집단 탐구활동에 대한 인식 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 29(2), pp.151~162 (2008), 한국지구과학회
- Keogh, B, "Learning in science : Another way in", Primary Science Review, 26, pp.22~23 (1993)
- 김희경, "학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1216~1234 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- Kim, S.-W, "The effects of discussion learning using 'concept cartoons' on middle school students' learning attitude and achievement", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(2), pp.299~315 (2001)
- 이석희, "과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 논의 과정 요소의 특성에 관한 연구", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.76~86 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이선경*, "소집단 토론에서 발생하는 학생들의 상호작용적 논증 유형 및 특징", 대한화학회지, 50(1), pp.79~88 (2006), 대한화학회
- 임혜진, "과학 문제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생의 논증 특징", 초등과학교육, 31(1), pp.13~24 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 임현주, "초등 단위 학교 영재 수업에서 나타나는 과학적 논증 과정에 대한 탐색", 초등과학교육, 31(4), pp.513~531 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 임재근, "초등학교 영재 학생들의 탐구 활동에서 나타나는 논증 과정 평가 및 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(4), pp.441~450 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Naylor, S., "Argumentation and primary science", Research in Science Education, 37, pp.17~39 (2007)
- Naylor, S., "Concept cartoon in science education" (2000), Millgate house Publishing
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
- 박정은, "논증 구조 교육을 통한 고등학교 학생들의 과학 글쓰기 분석: 과학 글쓰기 장르에 따른 글쓰기 과제를 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), pp.824~847 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 박영신, "교실에서의 실질적 과학 탐구를 위한 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.401~415 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- Toulmin, S., "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Watson, F. R., "Students discussions in practical scientific inquiries", International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), pp.25~45 (2004)
- 위수민, "학생 특성에 따른 소그룹 논증 수준 분석", 과학교육연구지, 33(1), pp.1~11 (2009), 과학교육연구소