초등학생들의 과학적 논증활동에서 증거의 유형 및 수준 분석
Analysis of the Types and Levels of Evidence in Elementary Students' Scientific Argumentation
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The use of evidence is very important in scientific argumentation. This study investigated the types and levels of evidence in scientific argumentation in an elementary science class. 34 fourth graders in a class were selected as subjects, and argumentation was performed in seven lessons on ‘Heat transfer and our lives’ unit. Small‐group argumentation was recorded, transcribed and used as data for analyses. The analyses found the following results. First, in regard of the types of evidence, personal evidence dominated over authority-based evidence. Second, in the analysis of the levels of evidence, using inappropriate evidence was found to account for the highest percentage, followed by using appropriate evidence and just arguments without evidence. There were quite a lot of cases of arguments without evidence. It was found that the types and levels of evidence that students used could change depending on the relevance between experiments and argument tasks.
Abstract
The use of evidence is very important in scientific argumentation. This study investigated the types and levels of evidence in scientific argumentation in an elementary science class. 34 fourth graders in a class were selected as subjects, and argumentation was performed in seven lessons on ‘Heat transfer and our lives’ unit. Small‐group argumentation was recorded, transcribed and used as data for analyses. The analyses found the following results. First, in regard of the types of evidence, personal evidence dominated over authority-based evidence. Second, in the analysis of the levels of evidence, using inappropriate evidence was found to account for the highest percentage, followed by using appropriate evidence and just arguments without evidence. There were quite a lot of cases of arguments without evidence. It was found that the types and levels of evidence that students used could change depending on the relevance between experiments and argument tasks.
참고문헌 (21)
- 조현준, "초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(5), pp.495~505 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Duschl, R. A., "Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education", Studies in Science Education, 38, pp.39~72 (2002)
- 장신호, "초등학생의‘증거’사용에 따른‘과학적 정당화’활동의 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(4), pp.414~426 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Kim, H. K., "Middle school students' open physics inquiry emphasizing peer argumentation: Its conditions, features, and roles", 박사, pp.2003
- 김희경, "학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1216~1234 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- Krummheuer, G., "Emergence of mathematical meaning" (1995), Sawrence Erlbaum
- Kuhn, D., "Thinking as argument", Havard Educational Review, 62(2), pp.155~178 (1992)
- Latour, B, "Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts" (1986), Princeton University Press
- Lemke, J. L., "Talking science: Language, learning, and values" (1990), Ablex
- 임재근, "초등학교 영재 학생들의 탐구 활동에서 나타나는 논증 과정 평가 및 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(4), pp.441~450 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Ministry of Education, "2009 Revised Korean national science curriculum. (2009-41)", ~ (2009)
- National Reserch Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- Newton, P., "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science", International Jounal of Science Education, 21(5), pp.553~576 (1999)
- 박영신, "교실에서의 실질적 과학 탐구를 위한 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.401~415 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- Perella, J., "The debate method of critical thinking:An introduction to argumentation", pp.1987, Kendall
- Siegel, M. A., "High school students' decision making about substantiality", Environmental Education Research, 12(2), pp.201~215 (2006)
- Simon, S, "Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation", International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), pp.1817~1841 (2006)
- Walton, D. N., "What is reasoning?", What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy, 87, pp.399~419 (1990)
- 위수민, "학생 특성에 따른 소그룹 논증 수준 분석", 과학교육연구지, 33(1), pp.1~11 (2009), 과학교육연구소
- 양일호, "과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.203~220 (2009), 한국과학교육학회