초등학교 영재 학생들의 탐구 활동에서 나타나는 논증 과정 평가 및 분석
An Analysis on the Level of Elementary Gifted Students' Argumentation in Scientific Inquiry
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of elementary gifted students' argumentation and examine the special features of argumentation founded in scientific inquiry. 28 students were selected in the special education center for the gifted in K National University. They were organized 8 groups of 3～4 students and engaged in scientific inquiry activity. The researcher wasn't involved in students' inquiry activity and argumentation except for the guiding and introducing their activity. In the first session, each group carried out the experiment 'Putting a heated can in the water' and then, the students discussed to probe their experimental results and build their explanation. In the second session, each group presented their experiment results and evidence from their experiment justifying their claims, and had questions from other groups. The protocol data during 8 groups' argumentations were analyzed using 'Rubric for Scientific Argumentation Assessment' (Yang et al., 2009) in three domains-the form, content and attitude. As a result, in form domain, almost groups were rated 2 points due to their argument without rebuttal on the subcategory of 'composition', but they got a good grade above 3 points in subcategory such as 'claim', 'ground', and 'conclusion'. In content domain, almost groups got points above 3 points. In attitude domain, there were some striking contrast between each groups. Six groups got good score more than 4 points on the subcategory of openness, but two groups, they alleged and got score below 3 point. While the 6 groups of all got 4 points in the aspect of participation, 3 groups got 3 points lower than because they only just asserted and not interact with other groups. Throughout the argumentation, two features were found that; as time goes by, arguments were refined; Students tended to use their prior to knowledge rather than evidence such as experimental data in making claims and conclusions.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of elementary gifted students' argumentation and examine the special features of argumentation founded in scientific inquiry. 28 students were selected in the special education center for the gifted in K National University. They were organized 8 groups of 3～4 students and engaged in scientific inquiry activity. The researcher wasn't involved in students' inquiry activity and argumentation except for the guiding and introducing their activity. In the first session, each group carried out the experiment 'Putting a heated can in the water' and then, the students discussed to probe their experimental results and build their explanation. In the second session, each group presented their experiment results and evidence from their experiment justifying their claims, and had questions from other groups. The protocol data during 8 groups' argumentations were analyzed using 'Rubric for Scientific Argumentation Assessment' (Yang et al., 2009) in three domains-the form, content and attitude. As a result, in form domain, almost groups were rated 2 points due to their argument without rebuttal on the subcategory of 'composition', but they got a good grade above 3 points in subcategory such as 'claim', 'ground', and 'conclusion'. In content domain, almost groups got points above 3 points. In attitude domain, there were some striking contrast between each groups. Six groups got good score more than 4 points on the subcategory of openness, but two groups, they alleged and got score below 3 point. While the 6 groups of all got 4 points in the aspect of participation, 3 groups got 3 points lower than because they only just asserted and not interact with other groups. Throughout the argumentation, two features were found that; as time goes by, arguments were refined; Students tended to use their prior to knowledge rather than evidence such as experimental data in making claims and conclusions.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김동욱, "초등학교 과학 영재아들의 탐구 능력에 대한 분석", 청람과학교육연구논총, 15(1), pp.60~72 (2005)
- 김영신, "초중학교 과학 실험 탐구 과정에 대한 분석", 중등교육연구, 55(1), pp.47~67 (2007), 중등교육연구소
- 김희경, "학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1216~1234 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 박영신, "교실에서의 실질적 과학 탐구를 위한 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.401~415 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- 양일호, "과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.203~220 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 양태현, "과학영재의 과학 관련 태도와 지능 및 과학탐구능력과의 관계", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), pp.531~543 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 토의토론 학습과 중등하교 과학교육. 1997년도 교과교육공동연구 결과보고서, "이범홍", 한국학술진흥재단, ~, pp.RR97-Ⅱ-6 (1998)
- 이석희, "과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 논의 과정 요소의 특성에 관한 연구", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.76~86 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 장신호, "과학적 증거 근거의 제시를 강조하는 과학 대화를 사용한 수업에 대한 예비 초등 교사들의 인식", 초등과학교육, 25(1), pp.96~108 (2006), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 조현준, "초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(5), pp.495~505 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- 홍준의, "초등학교 과학 영재 학생의 탐구 수행 능력 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(3), pp.267~275 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Alexopoulou, E., "Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), pp.1099~1114 (1996)
- Bandiera, M., "Active", cooperative learning in schools, 2006, pp.40(3), 130~134
- Brem, S. K., "Explanation and evidence in informal argument", Cognitive Science, 24(4), pp.573~604 (2000)
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Germann, P. J., "Student performances on the science process of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), pp.773~798 (1996)
- Naylor, S., "Argumentation and primary science", Research in Science Education, 37(1), pp.17~39 (2007)
- Newton, P., "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science", International Journal of Science Education, 21, pp.553~576 (1999)
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", School Science Review, 82(301), pp.63~70 (2004)
- Simon, S., "Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom", International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), pp.235~260 (2006)
- Watson, J. R., "Student's discussions in practical scientific inquiries", International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), pp.25~45 (2004)
- Yang, F. Y., "Exploring high school. student's use of theory and evidence in an everyday context: The role of scientific thinking in environmental science decision-making", International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), pp.1345~1364 (2004)
- Zohar, A., "Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), pp.35~62 (2002)