본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparative Study on the Collaborative Governance Type for the Metropolitan Economic Regions in case of Korea and Japan

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In Korea, the new regional development policies on decentralization, regional cooperation andcompetition have been established and exerted since the 2000s. Especially, in the field of regional development,as a main control tower, the Korean Presidential Committee on Regional Development(PCRD) has been promoting three spatial regional policies (Daily Happy Living Community in incumbent Park’s Administration and Daily Living Sphere, Economic Region, and Supra-economicRegion in previous Lee’s Administration) to address conflictual urban issues and, at the same time, to maximize regional growth potential in metropolitan areas. Meanwhile, in Japan, these issues areseemingly being conducted by the strongly institutionalized governance systems at the metropolitan and regional level, quite different from Korea’s state-steering regional governance system. As a result, we can draw some conclusions that the cooperative governance structures of Koreaand Japan depend obviously on the peculiar politico-social and economic conditions and problems in the metropolitan areas concerned where the collaborative governance and leadership can take diversvariations on a continuum from weakly to strongly institutionalized solutions. From the analysis,finally, we can picture some different governance solutions according to different metropolitanand regional policies between Japan and Korea cases.

Abstract

In Korea, the new regional development policies on decentralization, regional cooperation andcompetition have been established and exerted since the 2000s. Especially, in the field of regional development,as a main control tower, the Korean Presidential Committee on Regional Development(PCRD) has been promoting three spatial regional policies (Daily Happy Living Community in incumbent Park’s Administration and Daily Living Sphere, Economic Region, and Supra-economicRegion in previous Lee’s Administration) to address conflictual urban issues and, at the same time, to maximize regional growth potential in metropolitan areas. Meanwhile, in Japan, these issues areseemingly being conducted by the strongly institutionalized governance systems at the metropolitan and regional level, quite different from Korea’s state-steering regional governance system. As a result, we can draw some conclusions that the cooperative governance structures of Koreaand Japan depend obviously on the peculiar politico-social and economic conditions and problems in the metropolitan areas concerned where the collaborative governance and leadership can take diversvariations on a continuum from weakly to strongly institutionalized solutions. From the analysis,finally, we can picture some different governance solutions according to different metropolitanand regional policies between Japan and Korea cases.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Amin, A., "Managing cities, the new urban context" (1995), John Wiley and Sons
  2. Amin, A., "An institutional perspective on regional economic development", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(3), pp.365~378 (1999)
  3. Bae-Gyoon, Park, "Uneven Development, Inter-scalar Tensions, and the Politics of Decentralization in South Korea", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), pp.40~59 (2008)
  4. Bickers, K. N., "The Microfoundations of the Tiebout Model", Urban Affairs Review, 34, pp.76~93 (1998)
  5. Blomquist, W., "Fiscal, Service, and Political Impacts of Indianapolis-Marion County’s Unigov", Publius, 25(4), pp.37~54 (1995)
  6. Carr J.B., "Metropolitan Government and Economic Development", Urban Affairs Review, 34, pp.476~488 (1999)
  7. Carr J.B., "City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives : Reshaping the Local Government Landscape" (2004), M.E. Sharpe
  8. Condrey, S. E., "Organizational and Personnel Impacts of Local Government Consolidation:Athens-Clarke County, Georgia", Journal of Urban Affairs, 16, pp.371~383 (1994)
  9. ESPON, "Territorial Dynamics in Europe: Regions and cities in the global economy" (2012)
  10. Eurostat, "Eurostat regional yearbook 2011", ~ (2011)
  11. Feiock R. C., "City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives : Reshaping the Local Government Landscape", pp.39~52 (2004), M.E. Sharpe
  12. Florida, R., "The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life" (2002), Basic Books
  13. Herrschel, T., "Governance of Europe’s city regions: planning, policy and politics" (2002), Routledge
  14. Jacobs, J., "Cities and the wealth of nations" (1984), Random House
  15. Jonas, Andrew E.G, "Introduction to a Debate on City-Regions: New Geographies of Governance, Democracy and Social Reproduction", International Journal of Urban and Regional research, 31(1), pp.169~178 (2007)
  16. Kwon, Taeho, "Backward Regions in Korea Development Plans and Their Policy Implications. In Korea Regional Development Association, Urban and Regional Development in East Asian Countries: Lessons and Experiences", The 1st Congress of Asian Association of Urban and Regional Studies (AAURS), pp.95~109 (2007)
  17. Le Galès Patrick, "Regions in Europe" (1998), Routledge
  18. Leibovitz, J., "Institutional barriers to associative city-region governance: the politics of institution-building and economic governance in ‘Canada’s Technology Triangle’", Urban Studies, 40(40), pp.2613~2642 (2003)
  19. LGA, "regional improvement and efficiency partnership directory", ~ (2007)
  20. MacLeod, G., "The new regionalism reconsidered : globalization, regulation and the recasing of political economic space", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, pp.804~829 (2001)
  21. A Framework for City-Regions:Working Paper 2 : City-Regions : Policy and practice : Lessons from France, "Marvin, Simon", ODPM, ~ (2006)
  22. McGuirk, P. M., "State, strategy, and scale in the competitive citya neo Gramscian anlaysis of the governance of ‘global Sydeny’", Environment and Planning A, 36, pp.1019~1043 (2004)
  23. OECD, "Green Growth in Kitakyushu, Japan, OECD Green Growth Studies" (2013), OECD Publishing
  24. OECD, "Redefining “Urban”: A New Way to Measure Metropolitan Areas" (2012), OECD Publishing
  25. OECD Urban Policy Reviews: Korea 2012, "OECD", ~ (2012)
  26. OECD, "OECD Territorial Reviews Champagne-Ardenne" (2002), France, OECD, publications
  27. Competitive Cities in the Global Economy, "OECD Territorial Reviews", OECD, ~ (2006)
  28. Ohmae, K., "The rise of the region state", Foreign Affairs, 72, pp.78~87 (1993)
  29. Park Jong Hwa, "Brokerage Activities in Regional Innovation Networks: the Case of DRIA in Korea", presented in Spring Seminar of KAPA (2008)
  30. Pierce, N. R., "Citistates: how urban American can prosper in a competitive world" (1993), Seven Locks Press
  31. Porter, M., "Global city-regions : trends, theory, policy" (2001), Oxford University Press
  32. Pyke, F., "Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy" (1990), International Institute for labour Studies
  33. Report for Office of Deputy Prime Minister, Cities, City Regions and the Changing Geography of Business Offices, , Alan Townsend & Janet Tully, University of Durham, Stockton, International Centre for Regional Regeneration & Development Studies (ICRRDS), Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham, ~ (2004)
  34. Scott, A., "Global city-regions: trends, theory, policy" (2001), Oxford University Press
  35. Scott, A.J., "Region, globalizations, development", Regional Studies, 37, pp.579~593 (2003)
  36. Tiebout C. M., "A pure theory of local expenditure", Journal of Political Economy, 64, pp.416~424 (1956)
  37. "Urban and Regional Development in East Asian Countries: Lessons and Experiences, December 10-14, 2007, hosted by Korea Regional Development Association", ~ (2007)
  38. Wile, A. A.E.G. Jonas, "Unblocking the city: growth pressures, collective provision and the search for new spaces of governance in Greater Cambridge", England, Environment and Planning A, 36, pp.279~304 (2004)
  39. Working Party on Territorial Indicators, "Annex to Redefining urban: A new way to measure metropolitan areas in OECD countries : List of functional urban areas by country", ~ (2011)
  40. "Urbanaudit. org"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)