의성의태어의 사전 처리에 대하여 - 관련어의 유형과 정보 제시 방식을 중심으로 -
Regarding the dictionary handling ofonomatopoeic/mimetic words - Centering on the types of related words and information presenting methods -
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the present paper, the ways how onomatopoeic/mimetic words are presented in dictionaries were examined centering on the types and categories of related words and related words presenting methods. As everyone knows, Korean onomatopoeic/mimetic words have related words that show differences in nuances through replacements of consonants and vowels. In addition, new vocabularies having morphological/semantic relations are formed through repetition, form extension, and affix combinations. Therefore, existing Korean dictionaries provide onomatopoeic/mimetic word related words information. However, the systems and methods of provision are different among dictionaries. Therefore. in dictionary handling of onomatopoeic/mimetic words, securing systemicity should be more important than anything else. Therefore, in the present paper, the ways how onomatopoeic/mimetic word related words are handled in the <Korean Standard Unabridged Dictionary>, the <Yonsei Korean Dictionary>, and the <Korea University Korean Dictionary> were compared and analyzed in chapter 1. In chapter 2, how the types are classified in individual dictionaries and the ranges of onomatopoeic/mimetic word related words provided were examined. In chapter 3, the methods of presenting related words information and the units used in individual dictionaries were compared with each other. In addition differences in the methods of explaining the meanings of related words and the order of arranging the explanations of meanings when onomatopoeic/mimetic word are polysemic words among individual dictionaries were identified. Onomatopoeic/mimetic word related words information becomes an indicator that shows morphological/semantic relations between entry words to users. Therefore, when providing related words information in dictionaries, the consistency and systemicity of dictionary descriptions, user convenience, and reference functions should be comprehensively considered.
Abstract
In the present paper, the ways how onomatopoeic/mimetic words are presented in dictionaries were examined centering on the types and categories of related words and related words presenting methods. As everyone knows, Korean onomatopoeic/mimetic words have related words that show differences in nuances through replacements of consonants and vowels. In addition, new vocabularies having morphological/semantic relations are formed through repetition, form extension, and affix combinations. Therefore, existing Korean dictionaries provide onomatopoeic/mimetic word related words information. However, the systems and methods of provision are different among dictionaries. Therefore. in dictionary handling of onomatopoeic/mimetic words, securing systemicity should be more important than anything else. Therefore, in the present paper, the ways how onomatopoeic/mimetic word related words are handled in the <Korean Standard Unabridged Dictionary>, the <Yonsei Korean Dictionary>, and the <Korea University Korean Dictionary> were compared and analyzed in chapter 1. In chapter 2, how the types are classified in individual dictionaries and the ranges of onomatopoeic/mimetic word related words provided were examined. In chapter 3, the methods of presenting related words information and the units used in individual dictionaries were compared with each other. In addition differences in the methods of explaining the meanings of related words and the order of arranging the explanations of meanings when onomatopoeic/mimetic word are polysemic words among individual dictionaries were identified. Onomatopoeic/mimetic word related words information becomes an indicator that shows morphological/semantic relations between entry words to users. Therefore, when providing related words information in dictionaries, the consistency and systemicity of dictionary descriptions, user convenience, and reference functions should be comprehensively considered.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김양진, "<고려대 한국어대사전>의 형태 분석 정보", 민족문화연구, (51), pp.55~117 (2009), 민족문화연구원
- 김진해, "<표준국어대사전>의 관련어 정보와 어휘관계 기반 사전 기술", 한국어 의미학, 24, pp.23~50 (2007), 한국어의미학회
- 김홍범, "한국어의 상징어 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1995
- 김홍범, "한국어 상징어 사전의 편찬 방안", 한글, (239), pp.137~160 (1998)
- 도원영, "민연국어사전 (가칭)의 특징", 한국사전학, 2, pp.85~109 (2003), 한국사전학회
- 도원영, "『고려대 한국어대사전』의 뜻풀이 정보", 한국사전학, (16), pp.106~136 (2010), 한국사전학회
- 도원영, "<고려대 한국어대사전>의 종합적 고찰", 민족문화연구, (51), pp.1~54 (2009), 민족문화연구원
- 박동근, "흉내말 체계의 ‘빈칸’ 연구", 한말연구, 1, pp.103~138 (1995), 한말연구학회
- 박동근, "내적변화에 의한 파생과 유표성 - 흉내말의 홀소리 교체를 중심으로", 한말연구, (19), pp.91~116 (2006), 한말연구학회
- 박동근, "한국어 흉내말의 관련어망 설계를 위한 기초 연구", 반교어문연구, (35), pp.165~193 (2013), 반교어문학회
- 박미영, "<고려대 한국어대사전>의 관련어 정보", 민족문화연구, (51), pp.167~213 (2009), 민족문화연구원
- 박주원, "의성의태 용언의 특성과 사전 처리 방향", 한국사전학, (15), pp.128~164 (2010), 한국사전학회
- 박창원, "현대국어 의성의태어의 형태와 음운", 새국어생활, 3(2), pp.16~53 (1993), 국립국어연구원
- 서태길, "<고려대 한국어대사전>의 문법 및 뜻풀이 정보", 민족문화연구, (51), pp.119~166 (2009), 민족문화연구원
- 손달임, "현대국어 의성의태어의 형태와 음운 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2012
- 손달임, "의성의태어의 내적 변화에 대하여", 형태론집담회 발표문 (2012)
- 신중진, "의성의태어의 사전 처리와 그 방향", 관악어문연구, 26, pp.265~291 (2001), 서울대학교국어국문학과
- 양명희, "국어사전의 유의어에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 22, pp.165~184 (2007), 한국어의미학회
- 유현경, "<연세 한국어사전>과 <고려대 한국어대사전> 비교 연구 ―언어사전으로서의 특성을 중심으로―", 한글, (295), pp.35~71 (2012), 한글학회
- 이상혁, "국어연구와의미 정보" (2005), 월인
- 이희자, "국어사전의 ‘관련어’ 연구", 한국사전학, (7), pp.161~189 (2006), 한국사전학회
- 조남호, "국어 사전에서의 의성 의태어 처리", 새국어생활, 3(2), pp.73~91 (1993), 국립국어연구원
- 황은하, "연세 현대한국어사전의 흉내말 처리 연구", 제41회 한말연구학회 전국학술대회 발표요지문, pp.32~45 (2015)