본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공급사슬 회복탄력성에서 활용, 탐구, 양면성 전략의 역할과 기업 규모의 영향

The Role of Exploitation, Exploration, and Ambidexterity Strategies in Supply Chain Resilience and the Impact of Firm Size

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구에서는 March(1991)의 조직학습 이론에서 제시한 활용과 탐구 전략이 공급사슬 회복탄력성에 미치는 영향을 실증하여 이를 위한 효율적인 전략을 제공하고자 한다. 더불어 기존의 활용과 탐구 전략이 대립 관계에서 벗어나 양면성의관점에서 동시 추구가 가능하다는 논의가 제기됨에 따라, 활용과 탐구 전략을 동시에 추구하는 양면성 전략이 공급사슬회복탄력성에 미치는 영향 역시 실증하고자 한다. 328개 국내 제조기업 표본으로 분석을 수행한 결과, 활용 전략과 탐구전략은 회복탄력성에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 반면, 양면성 전략은 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한본 연구의 결과는 양면성 전략의 효과에 대한 기존 논의에 모순되는 실증적 증거로써, 공급사슬의 회복탄력성 관점에서는활용과 탐구 전략을 동시에 추구하는 양면성 전략은 오히려 자원의 분산과 관리의 복잡성을 야기시켜 효과적이지 않고 하나의 전략을 선택하여 집중하는 것이 보다 효율적인 전략이 될 수 있다는 실무적인 지침을 제공한다.

Abstract

This study aims to empirically examine the effects of exploitation and exploration strategies, as proposed by March (1991) in organizational learning theory, on supply chain resilience, thereby providing efficient strategies for enhancing resilience. Furthermore, considering discussions that suggest exploitation and exploration strategies can be pursued simultaneously from an ambidextrous perspective, rather than being mutually exclusive, this study also seeks to empirically test the impact of ambidextrous strategies on supply chain resilience. The analysis, conducted on a sample of 328 domestic manufacturing firms, reveals that while both exploitation and exploration strategies positively impact resilience, the ambidextrous strategy does not have a significant effect. These findings provide empirical evidence contrary to the existing discussions on the effectiveness of ambidextrous strategies. They offer practical guidance, indicating that the simultaneous pursuit of exploitation and exploration strategies can lead to resource dispersion and management complexity from a supply chain resilience perspective. Thus, a focus on selective strategies may be more efficient.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. 김봉광, "조직수준의 탐험, 활용, 양면적 혁신이 개인의 직무만족과 직무성과에 미치는 영향 : 철강산업 사례에 대한 다수준 분석", 한국생산관리학회지, 29(3), pp.331~349 (2018)
  2. 박은실, "동적역량과 양면성역량이 지속가능 공급망활동의 성과창출과정에 미치는 영향 : 구매사 관점을 중심으로", 한국생산관리학회지, 33(3), pp.541~564 (2022)
  3. 반재인, "기업 특성에 따른 SCM전략이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국생산관리학회지, 22(2), pp.197~213 (2011)
  4. 배병렬, "Amos27 구조방정식모델링" (2021), 도서출판 청람
  5. 우종필, "구조방정식모델 개념과 이해" (2015), 한나래아카데미
  6. 정의범, "소셜 및 베이지안 네트워크 관점의 공급망 리스크 분석", 한국생산관리학회지, 34(1), pp.1~17 (2023)
  7. 최병일, "부품 공급망 위험이 공급사슬과 해운 분야에 미치는 영향 : 자동차 산업을 중심으로", 한국생산관리학회지, 34(1), pp.111~128 (2023)
  8. Ambulkar, S., "Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions : Scale development and empirical examination", Journal of Operations Management, 33, pp.111~122 (2015)
  9. Andriopoulos, C., "Exploitationexploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity : Managing paradoxes of innovation", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.696~717 (2009)
  10. Aslam, H., "Determining the antecedents of dynamic supply chain capabilities", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 25(4), pp.427~442 (2020)
  11. Bechthold, L., "Resiliency Models and Addressing Future Risks for Family Firms in the Tourism Industry", pp.178~205 (2021), IGI Global
  12. Birkinshaw, J., "Building ambidexterity into an organization", MIT Sloan Management Review (2004)
  13. Brandon-Jones, E., "A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), pp.55~73 (2014)
  14. Braunscheidel, M. J., "The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response", Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), pp.119~140 (2009)
  15. Cao, Q., "Unpacking organizational ambidexterity : Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.781~796 (2009)
  16. Chowdhury, M. M. H., "Supply chain resilience : Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory", International Journal of Production Economics, 188, pp.185~204 (2017)
  17. Chowdhury, F., "Institutions and entrepreneurship quality", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), pp.51~81 (2019)
  18. Clauss, T., "Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage : The role of strategic agility in the explorationexploitation paradox", Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), pp.203~213 (2021)
  19. Dubey, R., "Big data and predictive analytics and manufacturing performance : integrating institutional theory, resource-based view and big data culture", British Journal of Management, 30(2), pp.341~361 (2019)
  20. Eltantawy, R. A., "The role of supply management resilience in attaining ambidexterity : a dynamic capabilities approach", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(1), pp.123~134 (2016)
  21. Fiksel, J., "Sustainability and resilience : toward a systems approach", Sustainability : Science, Practice and Policy, 2(2), pp.14~21 (2006)
  22. Fornell, C., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  23. Giannoccaro, I., "Centralized vs. decentralized supply chains: The importance of decision maker's cognitive ability and resistance to change", Industrial Marketing Management, 73, pp.59~69 (2018)
  24. Grötsch, V. M., "Antecedents of proactive supply chain risk management–a contingency theory perspective", International Journal of Production Research, 51(10), pp.2842~2867 (2013)
  25. Gu, M., "The impact of information technology usage on supply chain resilience and performance : An ambidexterous view", International Journal of Production Economics, 232, pp.107956~ (2021)
  26. Gualandris, J., "Exploration and exploitation within supply networks : Examining purchasing ambidexterity and its multiple performance implications", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(3), pp.667~689 (2018)
  27. Gupta, A. K., "The interplay between exploration and exploitation", Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), pp.693~706 (2006)
  28. Hair, J., "Multivariate Data Analysis" (2010), Prentice Hall
  29. He, Z. L., "Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis", Organization Science, 15(4), pp.481~494 (2004)
  30. Hu, B., "Business model ambidexterity and technological innovation performance : evidence from China", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(5), pp.583~600 (2016)
  31. Hu, M., "Is organizational ambidexterity always beneficial to familymanaged SMEs? Evidence from China", Journal of Business Research, 167, pp.114184~ (2023)
  32. Im, G., "Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships", Management Science, 54(7), pp.1281~1296 (2008)
  33. Ireland, R. D., "Crossing the great divide of strategic entrepreneurship : Transitioning between exploration and exploitation", Business Horizons, 52(5), pp.469~479 (2009)
  34. Jansen, J. J., "Structural differentiation and ambidexterity : The mediating role of integration mechanisms", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.797~811 (2009)
  35. Junni, P., "Organizational ambidexterity and performance : A meta-analysis", Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), pp.299~312 (2013)
  36. Kahn, K. B., "Investigating the relationship between innovation strategy and performance", Journal of Business Research, 132, pp.56~66 (2021)
  37. Kazancoglu, Y., "The effects of globalization on supply chain resilience : outsourcing techniques as interventionism, protectionism, and regionalization strategies", Operations Management Research, 17(2), pp.505~522 (2024)
  38. Knemeyer, A. M., "Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains", Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), pp.141~153 (2009)
  39. Koryak, O., "Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity : Exploration and exploitation", Research Policy, 47(2), pp.413~427 (2018)
  40. Kristal, M. M., "The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance", Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), pp.415~429 (2010)
  41. Kristianto, Y., "A model of resilient supply chain network design : A two-stage programming with fuzzy shortest path", Expert Systems with Applications, 41(1), pp.39~49 (2014)
  42. Lavie, D., "Balance within and across domains : The performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances", Organization Science, 22(6), pp.1517~1538 (2011)
  43. Lee, S. M., "Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability : building a resilient supply chain", Management Decision, 54(1), pp.2~23 (2016)
  44. Lin, S., "The influence of exploration and exploitation on bornglobals’ speed of internationalization", Management Decision, 57(1), pp.193~210 (2019)
  45. Lin, Z., "The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations : empirical investigation and computational theorizing", Management Science, 53(10), pp.1645~1658 (2007)
  46. March, J. G., "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning", Organization Science, 2(1), pp.71~87 (1991)
  47. Munir, M. A., "Building resilient supply chains : Empirical evidence on the contributions of ambidexterity, risk management, and analytics capability", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, pp.123146~ (2024)
  48. Ojha, D., "Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity : mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty", International Journal of Production Economics, 197, pp.215~231 (2018)
  49. O’Reilly, C. A., "The ambidextrous organization", Harvard Business Review, 82(4), pp.74~83 (2004)
  50. O'Reilly III, C. A., "Organizational ambidexterity : Past, present, and future", Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), pp.324~338 (2013)
  51. Partanen, J., "Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance : The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow", International Journal of Production Economics, 221, pp.107470~ (2020)
  52. Patel, P. C., "Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity", Journal of Operation Management, 30(3), pp.201~220 (2012)
  53. Pertheban, T., "The Relationship between Purchasing and Operational Improvement; Supply Risk Management Perspective-A Study on SMEs (Manufacturing Sector)", Global Business & Management Research, 11(1) (2019)
  54. Ponomarov, S. Y., "Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), pp.124~143 (2009)
  55. Raisch, S., "Organizational ambidexterity : balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.685~834 (2009)
  56. Rojo, A., "The impact of ambidexterity on supply chain flexibility fit", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 21(4), pp.433~452 (2016)
  57. Rojo-Gallego-Burin, A., "Ambidextrous supply chain strategy and supply chain flexibility : the contingent effect of ISO 9001", Industrial Management &Data Systems, 120(9), pp.1691~1714 (2020)
  58. Rosing, K., "Individual ambidexterity : The duality ofexploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), pp.694~709 (2016)
  59. Sheffi, Y., "A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise", MIT Sloan Management Review (2005)
  60. Solís-Molina, M., "Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration : The role of absorptive capacity", Journal of Business Research, 91, pp.181~194 (2018)
  61. Tamayo-Torres, J., "The influence of manufacturing flexibility on the interplay between exploration and exploitation : the effects of organisational learning and the environment", International Journal of Production Research, 49(20), pp.6175~6198 (2011)
  62. Tukamuhabwa, B., "Supply chain resilience in a developing country context : a case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 22(6), pp.486~505 (2017)
  63. Van Looy, B., "Organizing for continuousinnovation : On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations", Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3), pp.208~221 (2005)
  64. Vanpoucke, E., "Building supply-side resilience–a behavioural view", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(1), pp.11~33 (2020)
  65. Vorhies, D., "Improving customer-focused marketingcapabilities and firm financial performance via marketing exploration and exploitation", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(5), pp.736~756 (2011)
  66. Wenke, K., "Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance", Journal of Business Research, 132, pp.653~665 (2021)
  67. Wu, J., "Strategic ambidexterity and innovation in Chinese multinational vs. indigenous firms : The role of managerial capability", International Business Review, 29(6), pp.101652~ (2020)
  68. Yamakawa, Y., "Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio : Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit", Research Policy, 40(2), pp.287~296 (2011)
  69. Zhaxylyk, S., "Organizational ambidexterity and resilience : empirical evidence from uncertain transition economic context", Press Academia Procedia, 11(1), pp.47~51 (2020)
  70. Zsidisin, G. A., "An agency theory investigation of supply risk management", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(2), pp.15~27 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)