본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

양면적 공급사슬관리 활동과 경쟁우위

Exploration and Exploitation in Supply Chain Management Practices, Competitive Advantage, Firm Performance, and Boundary Conditions

허문구
경영경제연구소 (management & economic research institute)|2020.09|아태비즈니스연구 ((APJB) Asia Pacific Journal of Business)|제11권 제3호|pp. 107-122|DOI https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.11.3.202009.107

4

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

ExplorationCompetitive AdvantageExploitationAmbidextrous Supply Chain Management

초록

Purpose - This paper investigates the relations among exploratory and exploitative supply chain management practices, competitive advantage, and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach - This study takes a hypothesis-generating study to capture the tradeoffs between exploration and exploitation and develops some hypotheses which involve the relations among SCM practices, competitive advantage, and short-term and long-term performance. Findings - Exploitative SCM practices have more positive effects on short-term performance rather than long-term performance, whereas exploratory SCM activities affect long-term performance. Further competitive strategy, environmental dynamism, and organizational slack moderates the relationship between SCM and performance. Exploitative SCM is more desirable when a firm uses low cost strategy, lacks slack resources, and faces stable environment, while exploratory SCM is more effective when a firm employs differentiation strategy, has slack resources, and confront dynamic environment. Research implications or Originality - In order to understand the performance effects of a variety of SCM practices, we should distinguish between exploitative and exploratory SCM activities. Further the relationship between SCM and performance may differ depending upon some contingent variables such as external environment, competitive strategy and organizational slack.

Abstract

Purpose - This paper investigates the relations among exploratory and exploitative supply chain management practices, competitive advantage, and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach - This study takes a hypothesis-generating study to capture the tradeoffs between exploration and exploitation and develops some hypotheses which involve the relations among SCM practices, competitive advantage, and short-term and long-term performance. Findings - Exploitative SCM practices have more positive effects on short-term performance rather than long-term performance, whereas exploratory SCM activities affect long-term performance. Further competitive strategy, environmental dynamism, and organizational slack moderates the relationship between SCM and performance. Exploitative SCM is more desirable when a firm uses low cost strategy, lacks slack resources, and faces stable environment, while exploratory SCM is more effective when a firm employs differentiation strategy, has slack resources, and confront dynamic environment. Research implications or Originality - In order to understand the performance effects of a variety of SCM practices, we should distinguish between exploitative and exploratory SCM activities. Further the relationship between SCM and performance may differ depending upon some contingent variables such as external environment, competitive strategy and organizational slack.

참고문헌 (73)

  1. 강성배, "공급사슬 역량과 능력 그리고 기업성과 간의 관계: 공급사슬의 민첩성을 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 13(2), pp.95~109 (2012), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  2. 권현복, "공급사슬 통합, 역량 및 성과간의 관계: 목재산업을 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 23(2), pp.111~129 (2015), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
  3. 김국태, "동적역량과 경쟁우위: 환경동태성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 전략경영연구, 19(3), pp.81~103 (2016), 한국전략경영학회[DOI]
  4. 김병조, "기업의 여유자원이 국제화 정도에 미치는 영향에 관한 종단적 연구: 여유자원의 유형 및 지연효과에 대한 검토", 국제경영리뷰, 15(4), pp.1~23 (2011), 한국국제경영관리학회
  5. 김인수, "한국의 경영학연구", 경영학연구, 29(3), pp.293~314 (2000)
  6. 박찬권, "반응적 공급사슬에서의 민첩성 역량 선행요인, 민첩성 역량, 공급사슬 성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구 : 대구 경북지역의 전자 및 통신, 전기 산업을 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 25(4), pp.155~180 (2017), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
  7. 이태희, "기업 규모에 따른 공급사슬지향성과 공급사슬관리가 수출성과에 미치는 영향", 국제경영리뷰, 16(1), pp.243~273 (2012), 한국국제경영관리학회
  8. 주재훈, "고객가치, 공급사슬통합 그리고 기업성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구", 정보시스템연구, 21(2), pp.27~44 (2012), 한국정보시스템학회[DOI]
  9. Agarwal, A., "Modeling Agility of Supply Chain", Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), pp.443~457 (2007)
  10. Ahuja, G., "Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation : A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions", Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp.521~543 (2001)
  11. Ai, X., "Competition among Supply Chains : Implications of Full Returns Policy", International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), pp.257~265 (2012)
  12. Benner, M. J., "Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management : The Productivity Dilemma Revisted", Academy of Management Review, 28, pp.238~256 (2003)
  13. Berman, S. L., "Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models", Academy of Management Journal, 42, pp.488~506 (1999)
  14. Boyd, B. K., "Ceo Duality, and Firm Performance : A Contingency Model", Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp.301~312 (1995)
  15. Braunscheidel, M. J., "The Organizational Antecedents of a Firm’s Supply Chain Agility for Risk Mitigation and Response", Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), pp.119~140 (2009)
  16. Corbett, C., "Trade-Offs? What Trade-Offs? Competence and Competitiveness in Manufacturing Strategy", California Management Review, 35(4), pp.107~122 (1993)
  17. Craighead, C. W., "Addressing Common Method Variance : Guidelines for Survey Research on Information Technology, Operations, and Supply Chain Management", Ieee Transactions On Engineering Management, 58(3), pp.578~588 (2011)
  18. Eriksson, P. E., "Partnering in Engineering Projects : Four Dimensions of Supply Chain Integration", Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(1), pp.38~50 (2015)
  19. Esfahbodi, A., "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies : Trade-Offs Between Environmental and Cost Performance", International Journal of Production Economics, 181, pp.350~366 (2016)
  20. Esper, T. L., "A Framework of Supply Chain Orientation", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(2), pp.161~179 (2010)
  21. Flynn, B. B., "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Performance : A Contingency and Configuration Approach", Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), pp.58~71 (2010)
  22. Gibson, C. B., "The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity", Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), pp.209~226 (2004)
  23. Gimenez, C., "Supply Chain Integration and Performance : The Moderating Effect of Supply Complexity", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(5), pp.583~610 (2012)
  24. Greve, H. R., "A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations : Evidence from Shipbuilding", Academy of Management Journal, 46, pp.685~702 (2003)
  25. Gulati, R., "Renewal Through Reorganization : The Value of Inconsistencies Between Formal and Informal Organization", Organization Science, 20(2), pp.422~440 (2009)
  26. Gunasekaran, A., "A Framework for Supply Chain Performance Measurement", International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), pp.333~347 (2004)
  27. Hambrick, D. C., "High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries : A Contingency Approach", Academy of Management Journal, 26, pp.687~708 (1983)
  28. He, W. L., "Exploration Vs. Exploitation : An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis", Organization Science, 15, pp.481~494 (2004)
  29. Hult, G. T. M., "Supply Chain Orientation and Balanced Scorecard Performance", Journal of Managerial Issues, 52, pp.6~544 (2008)
  30. Hult, G. T. M., "Strategic Supply Chain Management : Improving Performance Through a Culture of Competitiveness and Knowledge Development", Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), pp.1035~1052 (2007)
  31. Jansen, J. J. P., "Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity : The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.797~811 (2009)
  32. Jansen, J. J. R., "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance : Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators", Management Science, 52, pp.1661~1674 (2006)
  33. Ketchen Jr, D. J., "The Intersection of Strategic Management and Supply Chain Management", Industrial Marketing Management, 33(1), pp.51~56 (2004)
  34. Kim, Sw., "Effects of Supply Chain Management Practices, Integration and Competition Capability on Performance"", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 11(3), pp.241~248 (2006)
  35. Kristal, M. M., "The Effect of an Ambidextrous Supply Chain Strategy on Combinative Competitive Capabilities and Business Performance", Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), pp.415~429 (2010)
  36. Lavie, D., "Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation", Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), pp.797~818 (2006)
  37. Lavie, D., "Exploration and Exploitation within and across Organization", Academy of Management Annals, 4, pp.109~155 (2010)
  38. Lee, S. M., "Ambidextrous Supply Chain as a Dynamic Capability : Building a Resilient Supply Chain", Management Decision, 54(1), pp.2~23 (2016)
  39. Levinthal, D., "Myopia of Learning", Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.95~112 (1993)
  40. Li, S., "The Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance", Omega, 34(2), pp.107~124 (2006)
  41. Lindell, M. K., "Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), pp.114~ (2001)
  42. Lyon, D., "Enhancing Performance with Product-Market Innovation : The Influence of the Top Management Team", Journal of Managerial Issues, 14, pp.452~469 (2002)
  43. Ma, H., "Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance : Competitiveness Review", An International Business Journal, 10(2), pp.15~32 (2000)
  44. Magretta, J., "Understanding Michael Porter: The Essential Guide to Competition and Strategy" (2011), Harvard Business Press
  45. March J. G., "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning", Organization Science, 2, pp.71~87 (1991)
  46. Maury, B., "Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Profitability Persistence : Sources Versus Outcomes for Assessing Advantage", Journal of Business Research, 84, pp.100~113 (2018)
  47. Mattsson, L. G., "Reorganization of Distribution in Globalization of Markets : The Dynamic Context of Supply Chain Management", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 8(5), pp.416~426 (2003)
  48. Mellat-Parast, M., "Logistics and Supply Chain Process Integration as a Source of Competitive Advantage", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 25(2), pp.289~314 (2014)
  49. Nair, A., "Co-Integration of Firm Strategies within Groups : A Long-Run Analysis of Firm Behavior In the Japanese Steel Industry", Strategic Management Journal, 24, pp.145~159 (2003)
  50. Nohria, N., "Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?", Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), pp.1245~1264 (1996)
  51. Peteraf, M. A., "The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage : A Resource-Based View", Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp.179~191 (1993)
  52. Podsakoff, P. M., "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research : A Critical Review of The Literature and Recommended Remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879~ (2003)
  53. Porter, M., "What Is Strategy", Harvard Business Review, 74(6), pp.61~78 (1996)
  54. Power, D., "Supply Chain Management Integration and Implementation : A Literature Review", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 10(4), pp.252~263 (2005)
  55. Prater, E., "International Supply Chain Agility-Tradeoffs Between Flexibility and Uncertainty", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5, 2001, pp.82, 3~839
  56. Qi, Y., "The Impact of Competitive Strategy and Supply Chain Strategy on Business Performance : The Role of Environmental Uncertainty", Decision Sciences, 42(2), pp.371~389 (2011)
  57. Rai, A., "Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities", MIS Quarterly, 22, pp.5~246 (2006)
  58. Raisch, A., "Organizational Ambidexterity : Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators", Journal of Management, 34, pp.375~409 (2008)
  59. Rajeev, A., "Evolution of Sustainability in Supply Chain Management : A Literature Review", Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, pp.299~314 (2017)
  60. Richard, O. C., "The Impact of Racial Diversity on Intermediate and Long-Term Performance : The Moderating Role of Environmental Context", Strategic Management Journal, 28(12), pp.1213~1233 (2007)
  61. Rosenzweig, E. D., "Tradeoffs in Manufacturing? A Meta-Analysis and Critique of the Literature", Production and Operations Management, 19(2), pp.127~141 (2010)
  62. Shen, Z. J. M., "Trade-Offs between Customer Service and Cost in Integrated Supply Chain Design", Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 7(3), pp.188~207 (2005)
  63. Simsek, Z., "Organizational Ambidexterity : Towards a Multilevel Understanding", Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), pp.597~624 (2009)
  64. Swafford, P. M., "The Antecedents of Supply Chain Agility of a Firm : Scale Development and Model Testing", Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), pp.170~188 (2006)
  65. Tushman, M. L., "Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments", Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, pp.9~465 (1986)
  66. Uotila J., "Exploration, Exploitation, and Financial Performance : Analysis of S&P500 Corporation", Strategic Management Journal, 30, pp.221~231 (2009)
  67. Utterback, J. M., "Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change" (1994), Harvard Business School Press
  68. Volberda, H., "Co-Evolutionary Dynamics within and between Firms : From Evolution to Coevolution", Journal of Management Studies, 40, pp.2111~2136 (2003)
  69. Voss, G. B., "The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmental Threat on Product Exploration and Exploitation", Academy of Management Journal, 51, pp.147~164 (2008)
  70. Wang, H., "Untangling the Effects of Overexploration and Overexploitation on Organizational Performance : The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism", Journal of Management, 34, pp.925~951 (2008)
  71. Wiggins, R. R., "Sustained Competitive Advantage : Temporal Dynamics and the Incidence and Persistence of Superior Economic Performance", Organization Science, 13(1), pp.81~105 (2002)
  72. Wiggins, R. R., "Schumpeter's Ghost : Is Hypercompetition Making the Best of Times Shorter?", Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), pp.887~911 (2005)
  73. Wu, Z., "Balancing Priorities : Decision-Making in Sustainable Supply Chain Management", Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), pp.577~590 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

공급사슬 역량과 능력 그리고 기업성과 간의 관계: 공급사슬의 민첩성을 중심으로강성배한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2012 · 제13권 제2호공급사슬 회복탄력성에서 활용, 탐구, 양면성 전략의 역할과 기업 규모의 영향김범석, 김우섭, 김진한한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2024 · 제35권 제4호공급사슬 적응성의 선행 및 후행 요인과 매개효과에 관한 연구민순홍, 양기훈, 이성현, 허대식한국로지스틱스학회 · 로지스틱스연구2024 · 제32권 제1호동적역량과 양면성역량이 지속가능 공급망활동의 성과창출과정에 미치는 영향: 구매사 관점을 중심으로박은실, 최도영한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2022 · 제33권 제3호The Influence of Integrated Supply Chain Management on the Korean Automobile Firms' PerformanceLEE sang-yoon한국해운물류학회 · 해운물류연구2006 · 제48권 기업 특성에 따른 SCM전략이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구김성홍, 반재인한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2011 · 제22권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)

The Effect of Information Asymmetry on the Method of Payment and Post-M&A Involuntary Delisting김창기, 톰슨에브라임과시pp. 1-20A Critique on Project Management View from Project Finance Perspective on the Critical Success Factors of PPP채명신, 김정주pp. 21-46인적자본은 언제 기업의 혁신성과를 향상시킬 수 있는가?: 국제화 경험의 조절효과를 중심으로권순환, 권종욱, 신만수pp. 47-62개인특성 · 대출특성 · 금리특성이 연체가능성에 미치는 영향박상봉, 오영호pp. 63-78심리적 안정감이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 잡 크래프팅(Job Crafting)의 매개효과를 중심으로이정미, 최수형pp. 79-94
원문 보기