본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘V+개사+X’ 구조 연구

A Study on the Structure of ‘V+Preposition+X’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper examines the category, structure, and function of ‘Zi, Yu, Wang, Xiang, Dao, Zai, Gei’ that appear after the verb. As for ‘Zi, Yu, Wang, Xiang’, it is common to see that these are preposition, and that they function as prepositional complement behind the verb. In the case of ‘Dao, Zai, Gei’, the most inconsistent views appear as to whether they are viewed as forming a prepositional phrase complement as a preposition or functioning as a result complement as a verb. Therefore, in this paper, in particular, the categories of these three components and the characteristics and functions of the structures they form were examined in detail. In the structure of ‘V+Dao+X’, it was suggested that ‘Dao’ is a verb and functions as a result complement because ‘Dao’ can have aspect marker ‘Le’ and ‘Guo’, the object(X) can be omitted or moved, and ‘De/Bu’ can be inserted between the verb and ‘Dao’. Next, although ‘Zai’ in ‘V+Zai+X’ may have aspect marker ‘Le’, it is more appropriate to assume that ‘Zai’ in this structure functions as a preposition category as it cannot form probable complements and is difficult to move or omit an object. Finally, although ‘Gei’ of the ‘V+Gei+X’ structure can appear with the aspect marker, it is rare to have ‘Guo’, it is difficult to move or omit the object(X), and it cannot form probable complements with the ‘De/Bu’ character inserted, so it is more appropriate to view it as a preposition like ‘Zai’. As a result, among the ‘Zi, Yu, Wang, Xiang, Dao, Zai, and Gei’ that appear after the verb, ‘Dao’ functions as a result complement as a verb category, and the remaining ‘Zi, Yu, Wang, Xiang, Zai, Gei’ can be seen as forming a prepositional complement.

Abstract

This paper examines the category, structure, and function of ‘Zi, Yu, Wang, Xiang, Dao, Zai, Gei’ that appear after the verb. As for ‘Zi, Yu, Wang, Xiang’, it is common to see that these are preposition, and that they function as prepositional complement behind the verb. In the case of ‘Dao, Zai, Gei’, the most inconsistent views appear as to whether they are viewed as forming a prepositional phrase complement as a preposition or functioning as a result complement as a verb. Therefore, in this paper, in particular, the categories of these three components and the characteristics and functions of the structures they form were examined in detail. In the structure of ‘V+Dao+X’, it was suggested that ‘Dao’ is a verb and functions as a result complement because ‘Dao’ can have aspect marker ‘Le’ and ‘Guo’, the object(X) can be omitted or moved, and ‘De/Bu’ can be inserted between the verb and ‘Dao’. Next, although ‘Zai’ in ‘V+Zai+X’ may have aspect marker ‘Le’, it is more appropriate to assume that ‘Zai’ in this structure functions as a preposition category as it cannot form probable complements and is difficult to move or omit an object. Finally, although ‘Gei’ of the ‘V+Gei+X’ structure can appear with the aspect marker, it is rare to have ‘Guo’, it is difficult to move or omit the object(X), and it cannot form probable complements with the ‘De/Bu’ character inserted, so it is more appropriate to view it as a preposition like ‘Zai’. As a result, among the ‘Zi, Yu, Wang, Xiang, Dao, Zai, and Gei’ that appear after the verb, ‘Dao’ functions as a result complement as a verb category, and the remaining ‘Zi, Yu, Wang, Xiang, Zai, Gei’ can be seen as forming a prepositional complement.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 모해연, "Focus 중국어 문법과 작문" (2016), 차이나하우스
  2. 박정구, "박샘의 친절한 중문법" (2005), 다락원
  3. 윤유정, "현대중국어 보어 분류 제 문제 고찰", 중국언어연구, (26), pp.269~299 (2008), 한국중국언어학회
  4. 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
  5. 北京大学中文系现代汉语教研室编, "现代汉语(增订本)" (2012), 商务印书馆
  6. 陈昌来, "汉语介词的发展历程和虚化機製", 柳州职业技术学院学报, (3) (2002)
  7. 傅雨贤, "现代汉语介词研究" (1997), 中山大学出版社
  8. 何乐士, "两汉汉语研究" (1992), 山东教育出版社
  9. 胡裕树, "现代汉语" (1979), 上海教育出版社
  10. 胡裕树, "현대중국어 동사연구" (2004), 학고방
  11. 胡裕树, "현대 중국어 동사연구" (2004), 학고방
  12. 金昌吉, "动词後的介词短语及介词的虚化", 河南师范大学学报, (3) (1995)
  13. 刘丹青, "어순 유형론과 개사 이론" (2011), 보고사
  14. 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法(增订本)" (2001), 商务印书馆
  15. 卢福波, "对外汉语教学实用语法(修订本)" (2011), 北京语言大学出版社
  16. 陆庆和, "실용대외한어교학어법(上)" (2021), 전남대학교출판문화원
  17. 马箭飞, "최신개정 신공략 중국어 3" (2019), 다락원
  18. 相原茂, "왜? 라는 질문에 속시원히 대답해 주는 중국어 문법책" (2017), 시사중국어사
  19. 徐晶凝, "현대 중국어 어법 강의" (2021), 시사중국어사
  20. 张纯鉴, "关于“介词结构作补语”的幾個问题", 西北师大学报, (3) (1980)
  21. 张赬, "汉语处所介词词组和工具介词词组的词序变化", 박사, 中文系, pp.1998
  22. 朱庆明, "现代汉语实用语法分析(上册)" (2005), 清华大学出版社
  23. Lehmann, Christian, "Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change" (1992), Mouton de Gruyten
  24. Sun, Chaofen, "Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese" (1996), Stanford University Press
  25. 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室编, "现代汉语词典" (2016), 商务印书馆

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)