한･일 「비난표현」 연구 ‒대한항공 086편 회항사건의 「비난」을 중심으로‒

Abstract

In this study, a researcher tried to classify the expressions of criticisms and analyzed the sematic contents of them from the standpoint of pragmatics. The research was conducted on the excerpt of the SNS messages about the incident of Nut return of Korean Air 086. Those messages, most of which were criticisms, were written by Korean and Japanese people. Also the researcher examined the range of the criticisms. First of all, the emergence aspects of criticisms were classified into 10 types of expressions, which were <sarcasm> <abuse> <declaration> <comparison・metaphor> <disappointment> <rebuke> <fury> <disease> <disparagement> <qualification>. In case of Korea, the researcher found 7 aspects such as <sarcasm> <abuse> <declaration> <comparison and metaphor> <disappointment > <rebuke > <fury>. In case of Japan, the researcher found out 10 types such as <sarcasm> <abuse> <declaration> <comparison・metaphor> <disappointment> <rebuke> <fury> <disease> <disparagement> <qualification>. The researcher found that both Korean and Japanese used <sarcasm> most frequently as a strategy for criticism. It is assumed that there was high antipathy against the person with high social status and power. Additionally, the researcher analyzed how far the range of condemnation reaches; ① the extended condemnation from the individual toward ethnic groups ② the extended condemnation from the individual toward the nation ③ the extended condemnation up to the past incidents. In case of Korea, there were only 3 confirmed cases for the extended condemnations. as opposed to the case of Japan, where there were 25 cases. In particular, the researcher found 19 cases of the extended condemnations from the individual toward the nation.