본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

古代漢語 ‘竊’의 문법화와 인지 기제 분석

The Grammaticalization and mechanism of the 'qie' in Ancient Chinese

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study investigated the characteristics of the grammaticalization of the ancient Chinese ‘qie’ from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. First, the cognitive path of grammaticalization was classified into three categories by referring to the existing process of transforming to syntactic expletives, and the processes of semantic expansion and semantic differentiation were explored with nouns and adjectives, and with Adverb 1 and pronouns, respectively. Second, in the grammaticalization of ‘qie,’ the chain shift of metonymy was examined. Third, the individual grammaticalization stages of 'Verb 1' and Adverb 2 were examined, and the process of synchronization with metaphors was explored. Fourth, the synchronization of metaphtonymy in Adverb 3 was analyzed. Fifth, based on the existing metonymy and metaphor model, the cognitive models of Path A and Path B were analyzed, and the grammaticalization process and concept of Path C were explored using a new metaphtonymy model.

Abstract

This study investigated the characteristics of the grammaticalization of the ancient Chinese ‘qie’ from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. First, the cognitive path of grammaticalization was classified into three categories by referring to the existing process of transforming to syntactic expletives, and the processes of semantic expansion and semantic differentiation were explored with nouns and adjectives, and with Adverb 1 and pronouns, respectively. Second, in the grammaticalization of ‘qie,’ the chain shift of metonymy was examined. Third, the individual grammaticalization stages of 'Verb 1' and Adverb 2 were examined, and the process of synchronization with metaphors was explored. Fourth, the synchronization of metaphtonymy in Adverb 3 was analyzed. Fifth, based on the existing metonymy and metaphor model, the cognitive models of Path A and Path B were analyzed, and the grammaticalization process and concept of Path C were explored using a new metaphtonymy model.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 許慎原, "說文解字今釋" (1997), 嶽麓書社
  2. 許慎原, "說文解字註" (1998), 上海古籍出版社
  3. 楊合鳴, "古代漢語字典" (2009), 上海古籍出版社
  4. 羅竹風, "漢語大詞典" (1993), 漢語大詞典出版社
  5. 中國社會科學院語言研究所, "現代漢語詞典" (2005), 商務印書館
  6. 中國社會科學院語言研究所古代漢語研究室, "古代漢語虛詞詞典" (1999), 商務印書館
  7. 중중한사전편집위원회, "연세 중중한 사전" (2015), 연세대학교 대학출판문화원
  8. 陳復華, "古代漢語詞典" (2013), 商務印書館
  9. 谷衍奎, "漢字源流字典" (2004), 華夏出版社
  10. 王力, "王力古漢語字典" (1984), 中華書局
  11. 김동환, "인지언어학과 개념적혼성이론" (2013), 박이정
  12. 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (2016), 한국문화사
  13. 허벽, "中國古代語法" (1997), 신아사
  14. E. G. Pulleyblank, "Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar" (1995), UBC Press
  15. Goossens, L., "Metonymy in Language and Thought" (1999), John Benjamins
  16. Heine, B., "Perspectives on Grammaticalization" (1994), John Benjamins
  17. Hopper, P. J., "Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 Vols" (1991), John Benjamins
  18. Goossens, L., "Metaphtonymy : the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action", Cognitive Linguistics, 1, pp.323~340 (1990)
  19. 李小平, "從"世說新語"看魏晉六朝的謙敬稱謂", 西南科技大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (1) (2006)
  20. 李娟, "謙敬副詞‘伏’, ‘竊’ 的語法化過程及對比", 現代語文(語言研究版), (7) (2016)
  21. 劉伯阜, "古書中的謙敬詞", 中醫藥文化, (4) (1984)
  22. 蘇俊波, "古漢語謙敬用法的得體性", 鄖陽師範高等專科學校學報, (5) (2002)
  23. 施真珍, "古漢語中的謙敬用法", 現代語文(語言研究版), (10) (2013)
  24. 孫民立, "謙敬副詞例說", 語文學刊, (3) (1991)
  25. 王毅力, "常用詞‘竊’, ‘盜’, ‘偷’的歷時演變", 語言科學, (6) (2009)
  26. 溫誌權, "古代漢語謙敬語的文化意蘊", 學語文, (5) (2010)
  27. 鄭琳, "‘惠’, ‘辱’, ‘屈’, ‘忝’ 作為謙敬詞語的區別", 唐山文學, (8) (2016)
  28. 趙禮淑賢, "中古佛經中的謙敬詞演變探究", 漢字文化, (21) (2019)
  29. 張辰蘭, "謙敬副詞的現代用法", 現代語文(語言研究版), (1) (2008)
  30. "CCL"[URL]
  31. "中國哲學書電子化計劃"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)