본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

从劳动法视角分析“996工作制”

Analysis of the “996 Work System” from the Perspective of Labor Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

“996”,这个曾经被我们冷落的名词,在最近一段时间却迅速占领了公众视野,引起了全社会的激烈争论. 事件不断发酵,不禁引起我们进一步探讨其背后的原因,以及将来可能出现的结果. 这种现象在各行业大行其道,其原因总体上不外乎于以下几个方面. 第一,随着AI技术、云计算技术、大数据技术的发展,5G技术在各个方面的广泛应用,互联网行业迅速发展,导致行业竞争空前激烈. 在企业和员工的博弈中,企业慢慢占据了上风. 当面临竞争压力和资本需要增加劳动时间来提高产出时,工人的抵抗力有限,被迫接受加班. 其次,企业管理体制落后,国家相关法律尚不健全也是非常重要的原因,而工作时间基准缺乏灵活性,司法机关加班工资补偿功能弱化现象尤为严重. 至于最挑动大众神经的休息时间加班费用,在996下员工本身休息权与获得报酬权难以避免的受到侵犯,并且难以维权. 本文将从上文提及的诸多方面对996进行全方位探讨,针对其引发的问题力图提出相对稳健的对策.

Abstract

“996”, a term once ignored by us, has rapidly occupied the public’s vision in recent period, causing fierce debate in the whole society. The continuous fermentation of the event can not help but cause us to further explore the reasons behind it and the possible results in the future. This kind of phenomenon is popular in various industries, and its reasons are no more than the following aspects in general. First, with the development of AI technology, cloud computing technology and big data technology, 5g technology is widely used in all aspects, and the rapid development of Internet industry, leading to unprecedented fierce competition in the industry. In the game between enterprises and employees, enterprises gradually take the upper hand. When faced with competitive pressures and capital needs to increase labor time to improve output, workers have limited resistance and are forced to work overtime. Secondly, the backward enterprise management system and the imperfect national laws are also very important reasons, and the lack of flexibility of working time benchmark, especially the weakening of overtime compensation function of judicial organs. As for the overtime cost of rest time, which is the most provocative to the public nerves, under 996, the employees’ right to rest and the right to receive remuneration are inevitably violated and difficult to safeguard their rights. This paper will discuss 996 from many aspects mentioned above, and try to put forward relatively stable countermeasures for the problems caused by 996.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 班小辉, "反思“996”工作制:我国工作时间基准的强制性与弹性化问题", 时代法学, (17) (2019)
  2. 白星晖, "996工作制,伤害了谁的休息权?", 人民法院报,第003版, 2019.5.6., ~ (2019)
  3. 陈伯强, "合法合规应对‘996’, 切实维护职工权益", 作家天地, (12) (2019)
  4. 鄂璠, "2012-2013中国生命小康指数: 79.1中国中青年人体质报告25岁成”亚健康”分水岭", 小康, (4) (2013)
  5. 付雨, "我国企业加班问题分析及对策探讨", 现代营销(下旬刊), (10) (2019)
  6. 郝婧磊, "不定时工作制下劳动者权益保护研究", 硕士, pp.2019
  7. 郝海燕, "劳动者加班费案件证明问题研究", 北京政法职业学院学报, (04) (2019)
  8. 寇 斌, "工会尴尬到何时", 人力资源, (04) (2011)
  9. 蓝寿荣, "休息何以成为权利—劳动者休息权的属性与价值探析", 法学评论, (04) (2014)
  10. 梁洪霞, "从996工作制看我国休息权的国家保护义务", 西南政法大学学报, (21) (2019)
  11. 李玥, "论宪法休息权的法律保障", 法制博览, (6) (2016)
  12. 所媛, "论休息权的国家保护义务", 硕士, pp.2014
  13. 王建国, "劳动法视域下996工作制法律问题研究", 经济研究导刊, (23) (2019)
  14. 魏咏梅, "互联网行业“996”现象成因及对策研究", 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版) (2019)
  15. 谢德成, "新时代劳动法的功能拓展与制度调适", 当代法学, (04) (2019)
  16. 徐行, "特殊工时, 使用需谨慎", 人力资源, (03) (2019)
  17. 杨诗萱, "特殊工时制度下劳动者休息权保障问题", 合作经济与科技 (2019)
  18. 阳蔚霞, "劳动监察执法困境的法律制度根源", 学习与探索, (01) (2020)
  19. 张新民, "完善我国特殊工时制度的建议", 中国劳动, (09) (2012)
  20. "996工作制逼员工自愿加班?劳动监察部门介入调查" (2019)[URL]
  21. "报告显示:超长加班过度疲劳是工伤事故重要原因" (2016)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)