한국어와 만주어의 직시 결합 동사 구문에 대한 대조 연구
A contrastive approach to the deictic verb complex in Korean and Manchu
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The deictic motion events in Manchu can be represented in two types of morphological constructions. One is the converb construction, in which the converb suffix connects the preceding verb with the following deictic verb, and the other is the derivative construction with the cislocative or the translocative suffix. This paper presents that these two constructions have different meanings and functions. The converb construction expresses the actual deictic motion of the agent as the core event, while the main event of the derivative construction is of the stem verb and the deictic movement in the whole event is incidental, unexplicit or unrealized. In the distribution, the verb participating in the motion event prefers either construction. Verbs that prefer deictic suffix are often telic, suggesting that the lexical aspects of the verbs are related to the semantics and functional differentiation of the two constructions. Unlike Manchu, Korean does not distinguish morphologically between deictic movement and deictic direction. Path verbs in Korean have limitations using without deictic verbs, but path verbs in Manchu do not necessarily require deictic verbs or deictic suffixes.
Abstract
The deictic motion events in Manchu can be represented in two types of morphological constructions. One is the converb construction, in which the converb suffix connects the preceding verb with the following deictic verb, and the other is the derivative construction with the cislocative or the translocative suffix. This paper presents that these two constructions have different meanings and functions. The converb construction expresses the actual deictic motion of the agent as the core event, while the main event of the derivative construction is of the stem verb and the deictic movement in the whole event is incidental, unexplicit or unrealized. In the distribution, the verb participating in the motion event prefers either construction. Verbs that prefer deictic suffix are often telic, suggesting that the lexical aspects of the verbs are related to the semantics and functional differentiation of the two constructions. Unlike Manchu, Korean does not distinguish morphologically between deictic movement and deictic direction. Path verbs in Korean have limitations using without deictic verbs, but path verbs in Manchu do not necessarily require deictic verbs or deictic suffixes.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김윤신, "상 보조 용언 구성 ‘-어 가다'", ‘-어 오다’의 의미, 2008, pp.(52), 57~78[DOI]
- 남승호, "한국어 이동 동사의 의미구조와 논항교체", 어학연구, 39(1), pp.111~145 (2003), 서울대학교 어학연구소
- 목정수, "한국어 방향격 표시의 세분화 기제 - 보조동사 ‘-(어)가다", 오다’를 중심으로 -, 2013, pp.(63), 161~188[DOI]
- 박은용, "만주어 문어연구" (1969), 형설출판사
- 성백인, "만주어 동사활용어미 -ci, -cibe, -me에 대하여", 文理大學報, 7(1), pp.34~42 (1958), 서울대학교문리과대학학예부
- 성백인, "만주어 문어의 부동사 어미-me에 대하여", 한글, 142, pp.72~102 (1968), 한글학회
- 성백인, "만주어와 알타이어학 연구" (1999), 태학사
- 임지룡, "한국어 이동 사건의 어휘화 양상", 현대문법연구, 20, pp.23~45 (2000), 현대문법학회
- 칼리나, "한국어와 어웡키어의 격과 인칭 대조 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 季永海, "滿語語法" (1986), 民族出版社
- 津曲敏郞, "滿洲語入門20講" (2002), 大學書林
- 河內良弘, "滿洲語文語入門" (2002), 東京大學學術出版會
- 早田輝洋, "滿洲語文語における｢行く｣と｢来る｣—｢行く｣と｢来る｣の使い分けの一例-", 大東文化大学紀要·人文研究, 33, pp.179~197 (1995), 大東文化大学
- 早田輝洋, "視点移動のない｢行く｣と｢来る｣", UP, 31(11), pp.29~33 (2002), 東大出版会
- Alonso de la Fuente, "Associated motion in Manchu in typological perspective", Language and linguistics, 19(4), pp.501~524 (2018), Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica
- Baek, S., "Excerpt from proceedings of the 1st conference on Central Asian languages and linguistics 1", pp.36~50 (2015), Center for Languages of the Central Asian Region
- Benzing, J., "Tungusischen Sprachen: Versuch einer vergleichenden grammatik" (1956), Akademie der Wissenscharten und der Literatur
- Fillmore, Charles J., "Deictic categories in the semantics of ‘come’", Foundations of language, 2(3), pp.219~227 (1966), Springer
- Fillmore, Charles J., "Santa Cruz lectures on deixis, 1971" (1975), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Girfanova, Albina H., "Udeghe" (2002), Lingcom Europa
- Gorelova, Liliya M., "Manchu grammar" (2002), Brill
- Guillaume, Antoine, "Associated motion in South America : Typological and areal perspectives", Linguistic Typology, 20(1), pp.81~177 (2016), De Gruyter Mouton
- Jang, Taeho, "Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics", pp.227~254 (2012), Harrassowitz
- Kim, Juwon, "The life and rituals of the Nanai people" (2015), Seoul National University Press
- Tsumagari, T., "Grammatical outline of Uilta", Journal of the graduate school of letters, 4, pp.1~212 (2009), Hokkaido University
- Zikmundová, Veronika, "Spoken Sibe: Morphology of the inflected parts of speech" (2013), Karolinum Press