만주어 접사의 문법화와 퉁구스계 언어에서의 분화
Grammaticalization of Manchu affixes and the divergence in Tungusic languages
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study focused on the grammaticalization of Manchu affixes ‘-ji-’ and ‘-bu-’. The suffix ‘-ji-’ is explicit in its grammaticalization from the Manchu verb ‘ji- (come)’, which is a lexical element. This suffix shares some functions with ‘-me ji-’, a verb phrase composition. It has developed to a deictic marker to indicate the direction in which the event of the preceding stem verb takes place toward the deictic center without the actual movement of the figure. The development of the suffix ‘-ji-’ seems to have taken the case of the suffix ‘-nA’ as a model. The suffix ‘-nA’ shares the semantic function with the ‘-me gene-’ composition and seems to have redifferentiated from it. Verb-phrase construction such as ‘-me gene-’ is not used as a motion for purpose in other Tungusic languages. It is the suffix ‘-nA’ to indicate the movement of purpose. And it is not limited to the deictic direction. This difference is the result of a change in which the function of the verb phrase composition of ‘-me’ in Manchu is expanded. The original suffix ‘-nA’ avoids overlapping functions and acquires a new function as a deictic marker. The fact that ‘-nA’, which has been inherited from the ancestral language, partially lost the function of purpose movement and received a change limited to one part of the deictic direction, would have been a possible background for the creation of a new marker in charge of the other deictic area. The grammaticalization of the Manchu affix ‘-bu-’ is difficult to estimate internally in Manchu. The similarity and semantic relationship between the forms with the verb ‘bu-(to give)’ shows the possibility of grammaticalization in the perspective of language typology. There are no data to observe the process intimately. Unlike other Tungusic languages spreading in the east and north area, Manchu has not differentiated the causative with the passive marker. Even in the Tungusic languages where the passive marker is distinct from the causative, the causative affix can also be interpreted as passive. On the other hand, passive markers tend to be limited to resultative or potential meanings and appear more frequently in non-personal phrases. Morphology of the causative suffix has the form with an intensifier attached to the passive form.
Abstract
This study focused on the grammaticalization of Manchu affixes ‘-ji-’ and ‘-bu-’. The suffix ‘-ji-’ is explicit in its grammaticalization from the Manchu verb ‘ji- (come)’, which is a lexical element. This suffix shares some functions with ‘-me ji-’, a verb phrase composition. It has developed to a deictic marker to indicate the direction in which the event of the preceding stem verb takes place toward the deictic center without the actual movement of the figure. The development of the suffix ‘-ji-’ seems to have taken the case of the suffix ‘-nA’ as a model. The suffix ‘-nA’ shares the semantic function with the ‘-me gene-’ composition and seems to have redifferentiated from it. Verb-phrase construction such as ‘-me gene-’ is not used as a motion for purpose in other Tungusic languages. It is the suffix ‘-nA’ to indicate the movement of purpose. And it is not limited to the deictic direction. This difference is the result of a change in which the function of the verb phrase composition of ‘-me’ in Manchu is expanded. The original suffix ‘-nA’ avoids overlapping functions and acquires a new function as a deictic marker. The fact that ‘-nA’, which has been inherited from the ancestral language, partially lost the function of purpose movement and received a change limited to one part of the deictic direction, would have been a possible background for the creation of a new marker in charge of the other deictic area. The grammaticalization of the Manchu affix ‘-bu-’ is difficult to estimate internally in Manchu. The similarity and semantic relationship between the forms with the verb ‘bu-(to give)’ shows the possibility of grammaticalization in the perspective of language typology. There are no data to observe the process intimately. Unlike other Tungusic languages spreading in the east and north area, Manchu has not differentiated the causative with the passive marker. Even in the Tungusic languages where the passive marker is distinct from the causative, the causative affix can also be interpreted as passive. On the other hand, passive markers tend to be limited to resultative or potential meanings and appear more frequently in non-personal phrases. Morphology of the causative suffix has the form with an intensifier attached to the passive form.
참고문헌 (34)
- 당천항, "만주어 'n형 어간'에 대한 형태론적 연구", 알타이학보, (31), pp.1~25 (2021), 한국알타이학회[DOI]
- 성백인, "만주어와 알타이어학 연구" (1999), 태학사
- 이승욱, "문법화의 단계와 형태소 형성", 국어학, 37, pp.263~283 (2001)
- 최계영, "한국어와 만주어의 직시 결합 동사 구문에 대한 대조 연구", 알타이학보, (30), pp.55~80 (2020), 한국알타이학회[DOI]
- 山田祥子, "ウイルタ語北方言の文法と言語接触に関する研究", 博士, pp.2013
- 安俊, "赫哲語簡志" (1986), 民族出版社
- 李林静, "ホジェン語の動詞構造", 博士, pp.2006
- 河內良弘, "滿洲語文語入門" (2002), 東京大學學術出版會
- Alonso de la Fuente, J. A., "Written Manchu ferguwecuke ‘astonishing’ and the oldest causative formations in Tungusic, A window onto the other: Contributions on the study of the Mongolian, Turkic, and Manchu-Tungusic peoples, languages and cultures dedicated to Jerzy Tulisow on the occasion of his seventieth birthday", 105~123 (2014)
- Alonso de la Fuente, J. A., "Associated motion in Manchu in typological perspective", Language and linguistics, 19(4), pp.501~524 (2018)
- 최계영, "On the passive or causative suffix -mbu- in Manchu: Focused on the headwords in dictionaries", 알타이학보, (26), pp.45~62 (2016), 한국알타이학회[DOI]
- Cincius V. I., "Jazyki Mira: Mongol'skie jazyki, tunguso-man'chzhurskie jazyki, japonskij jazyk, korejskij jazyk", pp.187~201 (1997), Indrik
- Gorelova, L. M., "Manchu Grammar" (2002), Brill
- Haspelmath, M., "The Grammaticization of Passive Morphology", Studies in Language, 14(1), pp.25~72 (1990)
- Heine, B., "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis", pp.1~16 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Ikegami, Jiro, "A dictionalry of the Uilta language spoken on Sakhalin" (1997), Hokkaido University Press
- Ikegami, Jiro, "Tsungūsu-go kenkyū (=Research on the Tungusic languages)", pp.73~93 (2001), kyūkoshoin
- Kazama, S., "On the "Causative" Forms in Tungus Languages", Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu-Tungus Studies, pp.73~92 (2004), Harrassowitz
- Keenan, E. L., "Language typology and syntactic description, vol. I", pp.243~281 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Kim, Juwon, "A Grammer of Ewen" (2011), Seoul National University Press
- Kim, J., "The Life and Rituals of the Nanai People" (2015), Seoul National University Press
- Knott, J., "Subject, Voice, and Ergativity", pp.53~59 (1995), School of Oriental and African Studies University of London
- Li, Fengxiang, "Recent Advances in Tungusic Linguistics", pp.167~180 (2012), Harrassowitz
- Malchukov, A. L., "Even" (1995), Lincom Europa
- Nedjalkov, I., "Evenki" (1997), Routledge
- Nikolaeva, I., "A Grammar of Udihe" (2001), Mouton de Gruyter
- Pevnov, A., "On the Specific Features of Orok as Compared with the Other Tungusic Languages", Studia Orientalia Electronica, 117, pp.47~63 (2016)
- Robbeets, M., "The causative-passive in the Trans-Eurasian languages", Turkic Languages, 11, pp.235~278 (2007)
- Starostin, S., "Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages" (2003), Brill Publishers
- Tsumagari, T., "A sketch of Solon grammar", 北方人文研究, 2, pp.1~21 (2009)
- Yap, Foong Ha, "Cognitive Linguistics and Non-Indo-European Languages", pp.419~446 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Yeon, J. H., "The Korean Causative-Passive Correlation Revisited", Language Research, 27, pp.337~358 (1991)
- "St.Peterburg", 1879
- Zikmundová, V., "Spoken Sibe" (2013), Karolinum Press