남북의 김기림을 넘어서

Abstract

In the 1980s, the lifting of the ban on writers who had been suppressed by North and South Korea was carried out, and many writers were released in 1984 and 1988 North Korea and South Korea seperately. Jeong Ji-yong and Kim Ki-rim, who were banned from both the north and south, began to be read during this period, Kim Ki-rim, who served as an inter-Korean negotiator shortly after liberation suddenly had disappeared from the Korean Peninsula during the Korean War, Kim Ki-rim, who thought it was necessary to create an independent unified and independent state, welcomed the United States and the Soviet Union. They tried to create a unified and independent state with the power of the United States and the Soviet Union that defeated Japan. However, when the trust rule began after the Moscow Triad, it switched to critical support. Although he was well aware of the interests of the new Empires of the United States and the Soviet Union, he gave critical support because there was no realistic way to achieve unification and independence. When the U.S.-Soviet Union Joint Committee broke down in mid-1947, Kim Ki-rim sensed the risk of division and actively launched an inter-Korean negotiation movement. Some intellectuals believed in the Soviet Union, others believed in the United States, and when the Korean Peninsula was rapidly on the verge of division, Kim Ki-rim criticized all of them and launched an inter-Korean negotiation campaign. However, when the divided countries were established in the two Koreas, and even Kim Gu, who was the main person of the inter-Korean negotiations, died, he managed to support himself and eventually disappeared in the process of the Korean War. After the war, he was a completely forgotten in the two Koreas. Then, in 1988, when Kim Ki-rim was lifted from South Korea, a lot of research was conducted, mainly from the angle of modernism. Since 1984, Kim Ki-rim has also been lifted in North Korea, and been read mainly in terms of ethnic and local aspects. This understanding of Kim Ki-rim, conducted by the two Koreas, could not explore the possibility of world history of non-Western colonies. Kim Ki-rim’s world understanding of the European crisis and exploring alternatives after World War I, should be read in consideration of the global outlook, including non-Western colonies, on the basis of imperial modernity and imperial modernity.