한중 양국의 후쿠모토이즘[福本主義] 수용: 제3전선파의 방향전환 논쟁과 후기 창조사(創造社)의 혁명문학

Abstract

This research focuses on how Korea and China accepted Fukumotoism in the late 1920s. In the late 1920s, Korea and China suffered imperialist aggression. Although in such an oppressive environment, intellectuals or patriots have used many methods to resist. Fukumotoism is a school of socialism from Fukumoto Kazuo. It was influenced by Western Marxism. When Fukumotoism was populated in Japan, it also influenced so many youngsters. Li Chuli, who was a member of the Post-Chuangzaoshe, and Lee Buk Mahn, a member of the third front were included. They were influenced by Fukumotoism and propaganda in their country. Therefore, Fukumotoism was introduced into Korea and China; and became the theory of directional transformation or revolutionary literature. Separative-coupling theory can be central of Fukumotoism. It is actually from Lenin. Li Chuli, the member of the Post-Chuangzaoshe. When he accepted Fukumotoism. He used the Separative-coupling theory to emphasize the Class consciousness of the literature. That is, in literary schools, he opposed or criticized all non-socialist literature. He believed that intellectuals should play their part and turn to socialist literature, eventually triggering a revolution. Lee Buk Mahn, who was a member of the third front. He focuses on the political struggle. At that time, Park Young Hee and Kim Ki Jin demanded socialist literature, and Lee Buk Mahn emphasized political orientation on this basis. Therefore, one emphasizes literary reform and the other emphasizes the necessity of political struggle. So an idea, spread through different media to different regions, will reappear in different forms, and Fukumotoism, in the process of connecting the West and the East, will eventually develop different socialist forms of East Asia. In early East Asia, many new ideas and literary forms can be said to be borrowed from the West. In the process of learning, there have been some knowledge exchange and morphological changes. This study also provides an opportunity for further research on the East-West knowledge transformation, which will provide more research paths of East Asian literature.